Skip to main content

Global Trade Dynamics: The Rise of Non-Dollar Currencies

 De-Dollarization Overview

De-dollarization refers to the process where countries reduce their reliance on the US dollar for international trade and reserves. This shift has been accelerated due to several key geopolitical and economic factors, including the Russo-Ukrainian war, U.S. monetary policy, and rising multipolarity in global geopolitics.

Key Drivers of De-Dollarization

1. Geopolitical Shifts:
Russo-Ukrainian War: The sanctions imposed by Western countries, particularly on Russia, have forced it to seek alternatives to the U.S. dollar. Russia has expanded trade in local currencies (like the ruble and yuan) with key partners like China and India.
US Sanctions and Trade Wars: Countries facing sanctions (such as Iran, Venezuela, and North Korea) are seeking alternative currencies or methods to circumvent dollar-based transactions. This has bolstered efforts for de-dollarization, particularly in the case of Russia and China.


2. Fed Interest Rate Hikes/Cuts:
The Federal Reserve's changes in interest rates significantly affect global economies. For instance, rising rates (as in 2022-2023) strengthen the dollar, making it costlier for emerging markets to repay dollar-denominated debts. This increases demand for alternatives to the dollar in international trade and reserves.


3. Rising U.S. Debt and Inflation Concerns:
Concerns over the sustainability of the U.S. fiscal position and rising inflation have made many countries wary of being too reliant on the dollar.


4. Emerging Global Alliances:
Countries like China, Russia, India, and Brazil (key members of BRICS) are increasingly promoting the use of their local currencies in bilateral trade. For instance, China is actively encouraging the yuan's use in global markets, with initiatives like the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) involving yuan-based loans.


5. Digital Currencies and Blockchain:
The rise of central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) and blockchain technology is providing alternative frameworks for conducting international trade without relying on traditional payment systems, which are dominated by the U.S. dollar.



Countries Trading in Non-Dollar Currencies
Several countries have actively begun or accelerated their use of alternative currencies in trade, especially in recent years:

Russia and China: Both countries are leading the de-dollarization trend. A significant portion of their bilateral trade is conducted in rubles and yuan.
India: India has signed agreements with Russia and Iran to trade in local currencies, avoiding the U.S. dollar. India also trades oil with Russia in non-dollar terms.

Iran: Due to heavy sanctions, Iran has long sought alternatives to the U.S. dollar. It engages in barter, gold-based, or non-dollar currency trade, including using cryptocurrencies.

Brazil: In 2023, Brazil and Argentina proposed a common South American currency for trade, aiming to reduce dollar dependence in the region.

Argentina and Saudi Arabia: In 2023, Argentina began settling some trades with China using yuan, while Saudi Arabia has expressed willingness to accept currencies other than the dollar for oil sales.

ASEAN Nations: Southeast Asian countries, including Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand, are increasingly trading in local currencies or using regional arrangements to bypass the dollar.

Available Data on Non-Dollar Trade
As of recent years, there has been an observable increase in global trade and reserves held in currencies other than the U.S. dollar:
The U.S. dollar's share of global reserves has declined from about 70% in the early 2000s to around 58% in 2023.
The euro accounts for about 20% of global reserves, while the Chinese yuan has grown to around 3-5% in recent years. Although still small, the yuan's share is rising, particularly in Asia, Africa, and Latin America.
BRICS countries (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa) have openly discussed creating a BRICS currency for trade, while pushing for local currency use in bilateral deals. Currently, these countries conduct a growing portion of their intra-BRICS trade in non-dollar currencies.

Bilateral Agreements in Local Currencies
Several bilateral agreements have been established to trade in local currencies. Some key examples include:
Russia and India: Russia sells oil to India in rubles, and the two countries have trade settlements in Indian rupees.
China and Russia: Nearly two-thirds of their bilateral trade is conducted in rubles and yuan.
Iran and China: The two countries trade in euros, yuan, or other local currencies instead of dollars.

Rise of Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs)
Countries like China (Digital Yuan) and Russia (Digital Ruble) are experimenting with CBDCs. These digital currencies could bypass SWIFT, the global financial system dominated by the U.S. dollar, and facilitate cross-border trade in a secure and efficient manner.
China has already expanded the use of its digital yuan domestically and has started cross-border tests with partners.
The European Union and other major economies like India are also considering launching CBDCs, which may facilitate cross-border transactions in non-dollar currencies.

Implications for Global Markets
1. Shift in Global Reserve Composition:
As more countries reduce their dollar dependence, we may see a continued decline in the dollar's share of global reserves, potentially increasing volatility in global currency markets.


2. Diversification of Trade and Investment:
Emerging markets and developing economies (EMDEs) are increasingly looking to hedge their risks by diversifying their foreign reserves into euros, yuan, and even gold, reducing dollar dominance in their financial systems.


3. Bilateral Trade Strengthened:
Trade among regional blocs (e.g., BRICS, ASEAN) will strengthen, with greater reliance on local currencies and currency swap arrangements. Regional trade alliances like the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) will also boost non-dollar trade in Asia.



Challenges and Obstacles
Entrenchment of the U.S. Dollar: Despite de-dollarization efforts, the U.S. dollar remains the most liquid, stable, and widely accepted currency in international trade.

Lack of Trust in Alternatives: Currencies like the yuan or ruble still face trust deficits in international markets due to governance, liquidity, and transparency concerns.
Infrastructure for Alternatives: The global financial infrastructure (e.g., SWIFT) is deeply entrenched in the U.S. dollar. While there are alternatives like CIPS (China’s cross-border payment system), they are not yet widely adopted.

Conclusion
While de-dollarization is gaining momentum, particularly in geopolitical hotspots and among countries seeking independence from U.S. economic influence, it will likely be a gradual process. The U.S. dollar's dominance is deeply rooted in global trade, finance, and reserve systems. However, the increasing use o
f non-dollar currencies in trade and the rise of CBDCs are setting the stage for a more multipolar currency landscape.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ana Kasparian: The Voice That Won’t Be Silent — A Call for Truth in an Age of Power

  Ana Kasparian is one of the most recognized and outspoken voices in contemporary political media. As a co-host of The Young Turks — a trailblazing online news and commentary program — she has spent nearly two decades dissecting U.S. politics, media, power, and foreign policy with unapologetic clarity and fierce conviction. She is not just a commentator — she is a truth-seeker who challenges power at every turn , refusing to soften her words for comfort. Schooled in journalism and political science, Ana’s commentary continues to mobilize millions, especially younger generations who feel unheard in mainstream discourse. A Voice Against the Status Quo Ana’s rhetoric can be bold, controversial, and deeply passionate — because she refuses to accept narratives that obscure the underlying truth about power and influence. On American democracy and foreign policy, she strikes at the heart of what many hesitate to articulate: “ We don’t actually live in a true democracy here in t...
Post a Comment
Read more

Dr. Randa Abdel Fattah. De-Invited by Association: When Grief Becomes a Pretext and Palestinian Identity a Liability

How Dr. Randa Abdel-Fattah Was Silenced in the Name of “Sensitivity” In a remarkable feat of moral gymnastics, Australia’s literary establishment has once again demonstrated how grief can be weaponised, principles suspended, and Palestinian identity rendered dangerously “inappropriate ” —all in the name of cultural sensitivity. Dr. Randa Abdel-Fattah , a respected author, academic, and public intellectual, was quietly de-invited from Adelaide Writers’ Week following the Bondi Junction massacre. Not because she had any connection—real, implied, or imagined—to the atrocity. Not because she endorsed violence. Not because she violated any law or ethical standard. But because, apparently, the mere presence of a Palestinian Muslim woman who speaks about justice is now considered culturally unsafe during national mourning . One wonders: unsafe for whom? The Logic of the Absurd Festival organisers were careful—almost impressively so—to state that Dr. Abdel-Fattah had nothing to do wi...
Post a Comment
Read more

Gaza and the Collapse of World Order: When the Guardian of Human Rights Sounds the Alarm

There are moments when the language of diplomacy fails, when caution becomes complicity, and when silence becomes an accomplice to destruction. On January 9, 2026, Agnès Callamard—Secretary General of Amnesty International—crossed that threshold. Her words were unambiguous, unprecedented, and devastating: The United States is destroying world order. Israel has been doing so for the last two years. Germany, through complicity and repression, is helping govern its demise. This was not activist rhetoric. It was a diagnosis from the very institution tasked with guarding the moral and legal architecture of the modern world. The Collapse of the Post-War Moral Architecture The international order that emerged after World War II was built on a promise: never again . Never again genocide. Never again collective punishment. Never again impunity for powerful states. That promise was codified in international law, human rights conventions, and multilateral institutions. But Gaza has...
Post a Comment
Read more

Rebranding Genocide: When Killing Learns New Words

  There are moments in history when crimes do not end — they simply learn new language. Gaza is living inside such a moment. The bombs have not stopped falling. The children have not stopped dying. The displaced have not stopped freezing in tents pitched atop rubble that was once their homes. What has changed is the vocabulary . And in the modern age, vocabulary is power . If you can rename atrocity, you can anesthetize conscience. First, it was called self-defense — a phrase emptied of meaning by its repetition. Then it became a war , despite the grotesque imbalance: one side armed with one of the most advanced militaries on earth, backed by the world’s most powerful empire ; the other a besieged civilian population without an army, navy, air force, tanks, or safe shelter. Now it is branded a ceasefire — a word invoked not to stop violence, but to conceal it. This is not peace. It is genocide with a quieter soundtrack. The Illusion of Restraint A slowed rate of killing is not m...
Post a Comment
Read more

Citizens on Paper, Expendable in Practice Arab Israelis, October 7, and the Failure of International Law Inside the “Only Democracy”

  Israel tells the world it is the only democracy in the Middle East . Democracies, we are reminded, protect all citizens equally—especially minorities—especially in times of crisis. Now look at Palestinian citizens of Israel , roughly 20% of the population , in the months following October 7 . Then ask: what exactly does citizenship mean when the state will not protect your life? The Forgotten Fifth of the Population Arab citizens of Israel vote. They hold passports. They pay taxes. They are citizens in the narrow, bureaucratic sense. But international law does not define citizenship by paperwork. It defines it by: Equal protection Non-discrimination The right to life Equal access to justice On those measures, Israel is not merely failing—it is structurally violating its obligations . A Murder Epidemic the State Chooses Not to Stop Long before October 7, Arab towns inside Israel were drowning in violence: Illegal weapons proliferated Organized crime flourished ...
Post a Comment
Read more