Skip to main content

From A1 to Baa1: Understanding Israel’s Credit Rating Journey

 Israel's credit rating was at A1 before it was downgraded to A2. The recent downgrades to A3 and then to Baa1 reflect the escalating economic and geopolitical challenges the country is facing¹².

Main Factors Behind the Downgrade

1. Geopolitical Risks: 
The ongoing conflicts with Hamas in Gaza and Hezbollah in Lebanon have significantly increased geopolitical risks¹². The potential for a wider regional conflict involving Iran and other powers has further exacerbated these risks¹.

2. Economic Costs of War:
The financial burden of the prolonged conflict is substantial. Government spending has surged, and sectors like tourism, agriculture, and construction have been severely impacted¹². The estimated war costs through the end of next year are around $66 billion, which is more than 12% of Israel's GDP¹.

3. Budget Deficit and Debt: 
Israeli's budget deficit is projected to reach 6% in 2024 and 7.5% in 2025, significantly surpassing previous targets². The debt-to-GDP ratio is expected to rise to 70%, a stark contrast to the pre-war goal of reducing it to 50%².

Impact on Borrowing Costs

The downgrades have a direct impact on Israel's borrowing costs, especially during wartime:

A downgrade to Baa1 reflects a lower creditworthiness, which makes Israel a riskier borrower in the eyes of international investors. This means that investors will demand higher returns (interest rates) to compensate for the increased risk.

This is particularly problematic in wartime, when Israel may need to increase borrowing to fund its defense efforts, but the cost of doing so is rising significantly.

- Higher Interest Rates: 
Lower credit ratings typically lead to higher interest rates on government bonds, increasing the cost of borrowing.

- Investor Confidence: 
The downgrades can erode investor confidence, making it more challenging for Israel to attract investment.

- Economic Recovery: 
Moody's has expressed doubts about a rapid financial rebound once hostilities end, suggesting a more prolonged economic recovery¹.

4. Increased Government Debt Servicing Costs:

With higher borrowing rates, the cost to service existing and new debt will increase. Israel's budget will face greater pressure, as more funds will be directed toward interest payments rather than essential services or defense.

5. Reduced Access to Capital Markets:

Lower credit ratings can reduce access to international capital markets, as some institutional investors (like pension funds) are restricted from investing in bonds rated below a certain threshold. This could reduce Israel's ability to raise funds quickly, exacerbating liquidity issues during the war.

6. Strain on Domestic Economy:
With rising interest rates, the domestic borrowing costs for businesses and households also increase, potentially leading to a reduction in business investment and consumer spending. This could lead to a recession, which would further erode tax revenues and economic stability.

7. Pressure on Israeli Bonds:
Israeli bonds are likely to see declining prices, as existing bondholders sell off holdings in response to the credit downgrade. This would push yields (and therefore borrowing costs) higher, compounding Israel's financial challenges.

Conclusion
The downgrade of Israel’s credit rating by Moody’s is a reflection of the significant economic and geopolitical risks the country faces, particularly amid the ongoing war. This downgrade means that Israel will face higher borrowing costs, further straining its budget and potentially limiting its ability to respond effectively to both the war and future economic challenges. 

The longer the conflict continues, the more severe the financial implications will become, impacting Israel's ability to recover economically in the post-war period. 

The downgrade also signals growing concern in the international community about Israel's overall stability, which could have long-term consequences for its economy and political landscape. 


Source:
(1) Moody’s Downgrades Israel Again as Economic Costs of War Mount. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/israel-downgraded-moody-again-war-204259787.html.
(2) Moody’s downgrades Israel’s credit rating by 2 levels amid economic .... https://www.ynetnews.com/business/article/skbmzjn0c.
(3) Moody's cuts Israel’s rating, signals potential drop to 'junk' amid .... https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/international/business/moodys-cuts-israels-rating-signals-potential-drop-to-junk-amid-ongoing-geopolitical-concerns/articleshow/113754471.cms.
(4) Moody's Cuts Israel's Rating, Warns of Drop to 'Junk' - U.S. News. https://money.usnews.com/investing/news/articles/2024-09-27/moodys-cuts-israels-rating-warns-of-drop-to-junk.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Rabbi Against the State: When Faith Refuses Power

In a world where identity is weaponized and religion is drafted into political armies, the sight of an ultra-Orthodox rabbi standing beside Palestinian flags unsettles nearly everyone. Yet there stands — black coat, beard, sidelocks — calmly declaring something that scrambles modern assumptions: “ Judaism is not Zionism.” For him, this is not rebellion . It is obedience . Affiliated with , a small and highly controversial Haredi sect, Rabbi Beck represents a theological current that predates modern nationalism. His argument is not secular. It is not progressive. It is not post-modern. It is ancient . And that is precisely the point. The Interview That Disturbs Categories In one widely circulated long-form interview, the exchange unfolds with almost disarming simplicity. Interviewer: Rabbi Beck, how can you oppose Israel as a Jewish rabbi? Rabbi Beck: Judaism and Zionism are two completely different things. Judaism is a religion. Zionism is a political movement founded little more ...

The High Priest of “Serious” Wars Discovers Bibi

  There was a time when rode into every Middle Eastern catastrophe like a TED Talk with a press pass. If there was a war to explain, a regime to modernize, or a “vital message” to send with cruise missiles, Tom was there — sleeves rolled up, metaphors polished. Back when the invasion of was sold as a democratic software update, Friedman wasn’t exactly storming the barricades. He was midwifing “creative destruction.” The region would be shocked into sanity. History would bend toward market reform. Fast forward. Now he’s discovered that might be bending something else entirely. When an Ex–Prime Minister Uses the Words “Ethnic Cleansing” What jolts Friedman’s latest column is not campus rhetoric. Not activist slogans. Not fringe NGOs. It’s — a former Israeli prime minister — using language that once would have detonated diplomatic careers. Olmert wrote in Haaretz that: “A violent and criminal effort is underway to ethnically cleanse territories in the West Bank.” Let...

Sanctions, Selective Morality, and the War That Never Ends

  On Feb. 28, 2026, The Editorial Board of NYTimes  warned that President Trump’s latest strike on Iran was reckless, unconstitutional, and strategically undefined. The board expressed concern for “the many innocent Iranians who have long suffered.” Eleven days earlier, on Feb. 17, 2026, wrote something even more explosive: “ Israel’s far-right government, led by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, is spitting in America’s face and telling us it’s raining. It’s not raining. Bibi is playing both President Trump and American Jews for fools.” Friedman was not questioning Israel’s right to defend itself. He was questioning whether American power was being drawn into a strategy shaped less by U.S. national interest and more by Israel’s domestic political calculus. That distinction matters. Iran as the Permanent External Threat For over four decades, Iran has been under American sanctions. Since 1979, layers of financial, oil, trade, and banking restrictions have been impo...

Blood in the Car Park: Islamophobia and the Fear That Follows Us to Prayer

  On a cold February evening in 2026, 18-year-old Zeeshan Afzal was stabbed to death in the parking lot of Oldbury Jamia Masjid, near Birmingham. He had just prayed. He had just stood shoulder to shoulder with other worshippers in Ramadan — the month of mercy, of restraint, of forgiveness. Minutes later, he lay bleeding in the dark. Police have said the investigation is ongoing and that the killing is not currently being treated as religiously motivated. That is an important and responsible clarification. Motive must be established by evidence, not emotion. And yet. Across Muslim communities in Britain and Europe, the question whispers through homes and WhatsApp groups alike: Are we safe? Even at the mosque? The Atmosphere We Cannot Ignore Even when a specific case is not officially labeled a hate crime, it unfolds within a larger social climate. And that climate matters. Across Europe, reports of anti-Muslim hate crimes have surged in recent years. Mosques vandalized....

When a Journalist Becomes a “Hybrid Threat”

  The Administrative Erasure of Hüseyin Doğru Europe prides itself on being the global capital of press freedom. And yet, in 2025, the Council of the European Union placed a German journalist under sanctions using a legal regime originally designed to counter Russian destabilisation. The journalist: The legal instrument used against him: Council Regulation (EU) 2024/2642 Concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s destabilising activities CELEX: 32024R2642 Council Decision (CFSP) 2024/2643 Restrictive measures framework (Common Foreign and Security Policy) CELEX: 32024D2643 Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/2021 (3 October 2025 – listing amendment including Doğru) CELEX: 32025R2021 These are not criminal statutes. They are foreign-policy instruments. And under them, a journalist inside the European Union was designated as supporting destabilising activities. What the Official Listing Says According to the Official Journal entry (Annex t...