Skip to main content

Noam Chomsky on How the Iraq War Birthed ISIS & Why U.S. Policy Undermines the Fight Against It

"As Iraq launches a new military operation to retake the city of Tikrit from the self-proclaimed Islamic State, thousands of Iraqi forces and militia fighters have converged in the city Samarra to strike nearby ISIS strongholds. The United States is expected to provide air support as part of its continued bombing campaign. The offensive comes as the Iraqi military prepares for a major U.S.-backed operation to retake Mosul from ISIS in the coming weeks. ISIS "is one of the results of the United States hitting a very vulnerable society with a sledgehammer, which elicited sectarian conflicts that had not existed," says Noam Chomsky. "It is hard to see how Iraq can even be held together at this point. It has been devastated by U.S. sanctions, the war, the atrocities that followed from it. The current policy, whatever it is, is not very likely to even patch up or even put band-aids on a cancer."

TRANSCRIPT

This is a rush transcript. Copy may not be in its final form.
AMY GOODMAN: This is Democracy Now!, democracynow.org, The War and Peace Report. I’m Amy Goodman, with Aaron MatΓ©. Noam Chomsky is our guest for the hour, the world-renowned political dissident, linguist, author of over a hundred books, MIT professor emeritus. Aaron?
AARON MATΓ‰: Yes. Noam, I wanted to ask you about ISIS. The big news is that Iraq is planning a major offensive to retake Mosul. It’s currently launching strikes to recapture Tikrit with U.S. support. My question is about the effectiveness of the U.S. strategy. To what extent is the U.S. constrained by its own policies in terms of the effectiveness of defeating ISIS, constrains in terms of its ties to Saudi Arabia and its refusal to engage with Iran and groups like Hezbollah, which have been effective in fighting ISIS?
NOAM CHOMSKY: Patrick Cockburn, who has done by far the best reporting on this, describes it as an Alice in Wonderland strategy. The U.S. wants to destroy ISIS, but it’s opposing every force that’s fighting ISIS. So, the main state that’s opposed to ISIS is Iran. They support the Iraqi government, the Shiite government. But Iran is, you know, on our enemies list. Probably the main ground forces fighting ISIS are the PKK and its allies, which are on the U.S. terrorist list. That’s both in Iraq and in Syria. Saudi Arabia, our major ally, along with Israel, is both traditionally, for a long time, the main funder of ISIS and similar groups—not necessarily the government; rich Saudis, other people in the emirates—not only the funder, but they’re the ideological source. Saudi Arabia is committed, is dominated by an extremist fundamentalist version of Islam: Wahhabi doctrine. And ISIS is an extremist offshoot of the Wahhabi doctrine. Saudi Arabia is a missionary state. It establishes schools, mosques, spreading its radical Islamic version. So, they’re our ally. Our enemies are those who are fighting ISIS. And it’s more complex.
ISIS is a monstrosity. There’s not much doubt about that. It didn’t come from nowhere. It’s one of the results of the U.S. hitting a very vulnerable society—Iraq—with a sledgehammer, which elicited sectarian conflicts that had not existed. They became very violent. The U.S. violence made it worse. We’re all familiar with the crimes. Out of this came lots of violent, murderous forces. ISIS is one. But the Shiite militias are not that different. They’re carrying out—they’re the kind of the—when they say the Iraqi army is attacking, it’s probably mostly the Shiite militias with the Iraqi army in the background. I mean, the way the Iraqi army collapsed is an astonishing military fact. This is an army of, I think, 350,000 people, heavily armed by the United States and trained by the United States for 10 years. A couple of thousand guerrillas showed up, and they all ran away. The generals ran away first. And the soldiers didn’t know to do. They ran away after them.
AMY GOODMAN: We have 20 seconds.
NOAM CHOMSKY: Hmm?
AMY GOODMAN: We have 20 seconds.
NOAM CHOMSKY: Yeah. Well, now, it’s basically—the effect, it’s hard to see how Iraq can even be held together at this point. It’s been devastated by U.S. sanctions, the war, the atrocities that followed from it. The current policy, whatever it is, is not very likely to even patch up, put band-aids on the cancer.
AMY GOODMAN: We’re going to have to leave it there, but we’ll continue this discussion tomorrow on Democracy Now! Our guest, Noam Chomsky, institute professor emeritus of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology."
SOURCE: http://www.democracynow.org/2015/3/2/noam_chomsky_on_how_the_iraq

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Overview of the threat to the banking industry, with examples from recent bank collapses and persistent future risks:

1. Increasing cyber-attacks targeting financial data:  Cyber-attacks like the 2017 Equifax breach (a) expose sensitive financial data, leading to significant financial and reputational damage. 2. Rising competition from fintech and non-traditional financial institutions: Companies like PayPal and Square are disrupting traditional banking by offering innovative financial services. (b) 3. Regulatory changes impacting operations and profitability: The Dodd-Frank Act imposed stricter regulations on banks, affecting their operations and profitability. (c) 4. Economic downturns affecting loan repayment and default rates: The 2008 financial crisis saw a spike in loan defaults, leading to the collapse of major banks like Lehman Brothers. 5. Interest rate volatility impacting margins: Rising interest rates in 2023 led to significant losses in banks' securities portfolios, contributing to the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank². 6. Technological disruptions in payment systems and banking te...

Zionism and Post-Holocaust Christian Theology: A Jewish Perspective. Mark Braverman

     Introduction of Mark Braverman: Mark Braverman is a Jewish-American psychologist, theologian , and prominent voice in the interfaith justice movement for Palestine . Raised in a strong Zionist tradition , Braverman underwent a personal and moral transformation after witnessing the realities of the Israeli occupation . He is the Executive Director of Kairos USA , an organization that mobilizes American Christians to support Palestinian rights. Braverman focuses on the intersection of theology, justice, and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. His work critiques both Jewish and Christian theological frameworks that support Zionism and calls for a prophetic response rooted in human rights and reconciliation. His major works include Fatal Embrace: Christians, Jews, and the Search for Peace in the Holy Land and numerous essays on interfaith theology and justice. Mark Braverman. Opening Note: In the wake of the Holocaust , Christian theology took a new direction — see...

Netherlands Moves to Block UN Palestine Expert, Accused of Shielding Israel from Criticism.

  The Dutch government's opposition to the renewal of Francesca Albanese's mandate as the UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories has drawn significant attention , particularly from human rights advocates and pro-Palestinian groups .  Below is a detailed overview of the situation: 1. Background on Francesca Albanese and Her Role - Francesca Albanese is an Italian international lawyer and scholar appointed as the UN Special Rapporteur for Palestine in 2022. - Her mandate involves monitoring and reporting on human rights violations in the occupied Palestinian territories ( West Bank, Gaza, East Jerusalem). - She has been vocal about Israel’s violations of international law, including settlement expansions, collective punishment, and apartheid policies. - Her reports often highlight accountability gaps and call for international action against Israeli policies . 2. Dutch Government’s Opposition - The Netherlands , unde...

Intensive Interview with Yoav Gallant. Ynetnews. Key Points.

                     Former Defence Minister, Yoav Gallant.  Here are key points with further details based on the interview with Yoav Gallant: 1. Missed Opportunity to Attack Hezbollah (October 11) Gallant saw a strategic opportunity to strike Hezbollah and eliminate Hassan Nasrallah early in the war. His plan included detonating Hezbollah’s communications (pagers and walkie-talkies) and carrying out targeted assassinations. Political delays postponed any northern offensive for a full year, which Gallant considers a historic mistake. 2. Gallant’s Role in the War’s Early Hours Received a devastating 6:30 a.m. phone call from the IDF chief on October 7. Described the grim atmosphere in the Kirya command bunker, realizing the responsibility rested on his shoulders. Led the initial military response against Hamas and managed broader regional threats, including Iran's proxy groups. 3. Political Maneuvering and Internal G...

When the Dogs Find the Corpses First πŸ’” Gaza, Bret Stephens, and the Theater of Western Conscience

  πŸ–‹️  πŸ—“️ July 11, 2025 πŸ”— www.ainnbeen.blogspot.com When the United Nations humanitarian chief starts therapy because of what he saw in Gaza, we should all stop pretending this is just another war. Tom Fletcher has seen Darfur. He’s walked through the remains of Aleppo and traced death’s footprints in the Donbas . But Gaza? Gaza made him break . “The sound and smell of death . Dogs digging out human remains . A generation of children abandoned to trauma. I started therapy because I couldn’t carry it alone.” That’s what Fletcher said. That’s how bad it is. And yet, here we are — watching this genocide unfold in high definition, sponsored by billion-dollar defense deals and moral rationalizations from newspaper columnists who sip lattes in climate-controlled studios while entire cities are vaporized. Enter Bret Stephens of The New York Times, offering a carefully reasoned — though deeply contentious — defense of what many view as indefensible. “ Wh...