Skip to main content

WINNER OF THE RESEARCH CONFERENCE 2008

The 2008 WHU Finance Award was conferred to Torsten Schöneborn and Alexander Schied from TU Berlin, Germany. His paper entitled "Competing players in illiquid markets" was acknowledged by the jury as the best submission to 2008´s Research Conference. Thus, the work was awarded with a prize money of € 1000.
About Torsten Schöneborn's and Alexander Schied's paper:
"The paper provides the analysis of strategic trading of distressed liquidity traders, i.e. the oprimal liquidation strategy under time restrictions. The paper is of interest for asset managers who have to unwind huge asset positions due to liquidity reasons. It delivers astonishing results: little competition (quantified by the count of competitors) is bad for the distressed liquidity trader. The paper formulates policy implications for asset managers as concnerns the disclosure of liquidity needs. The paper is written such that one understands the paper during the first read. The paper is very straightforward and immediately publishable and thus internationally competitive. It is simply excellent."

The 2nd prize witz a prize money of € 500 was awarded to Matthias Bank and Jochen Lawrenz from the University of Innsbruck, Austria for his work entitled "Demand deposits as commitment device and the optimal debt mix of banks in a continuous-time framework".
About Matthias Bank's and Jochen Lawrenz's paper:
"The goal of the paper is to present a theory for the optimal capital structure of banks. This is a challenging research question because the standard arguments in the literature, which explain optimal capital structures of non-financial firms, do not apply to banks. A major difference is - for example - the fact that banks can collect deposits which exhibit fundamentally different characteristics than the available financing instruments for non-financial firms. By incorporating the properties of both deposits and bonds into a continuous-time model, the authors provide a convincing motivation for the fact that the optimal capital structure of banks is a mix of deposits and bonds This paper is an outstanding piece of work because it applies a sophisticated model in a comprehensible way that allows to considerably contribute to the literature in the followin three ways: Firstly, while most related papers are not able to explain an optimal capital structure of banks, the paper drives the optimal amount of bank's debt. Secondly, the authors not only allow for one financing instrument but for a financing mix with deposits and bonds. Thirdly, important theoretical implications are gained from a numerical analysis that can be evaluated in a further study."

The 3rd prize (EUR 500) was granted to Aurélien Alfonsi, Alexander Schied and Antje Schulz from the TU Berlin, Germany for their paper "Optimal execution strategies in limit order books with general shape functions".
About Aurélien Alfonsi's, Alexander Schied's and Antje Schulz's paper:
"The paper is a high quality work. it is indicated to be work in progress although it is already at a very elaborate level. The referee considers it to be internationally competitive and publishable upon completion. The paper is of both interest and importance for institutional asset managers who have to transact large blocks of shares."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ceasefires, Fireworks, and the Fine Art of Calling Ashes “Peace”

  There is something almost poetic about declaring victory while the smoke is still rising. Not poetic in the romantic sense—more in the way a press release can be mistaken for reality if repeated often enough. So here we are. Another “ceasefire.” Another “agreement.” Another feather in the ever-expanding, never-examined peacemaking cap of Donald Trump . Israel–Iran. Israel–Hezbollah. Israel–Hamas. One could be forgiven for thinking peace has broken out everywhere—if peace meant pauses between airstrikes . The Theater of Victory On cue, Benjamin Netanyahu steps forward, flanked by ministers who speak the language of triumph as if it were immune to contradiction. “Iran weakened.” “Hezbollah contained.” “Total victory.” It all sounds remarkably similar to past declarations—just before the next round of fighting. Because here’s the inconvenient detail buried beneath the applause: none of the stated objectives were actually achieved. Iran still has its missiles. Hezboll...

🎭 War for Profit, Peace for Press Conferences

  A theater where missiles fall faster than truth There is something almost poetic about modern war. Not tragic-poetic. No— corporate-poetic . The kind where bombs fall… stocks rise… and press briefings sound like quarterly earnings calls. 💼 The Rumor That Refuses to Die So here we are. A war explodes between the United States, Israel, and Iran. And just days before it— a broker linked to Pete Hegseth reportedly explores investing millions into defense companies. Weapons manufacturers. Defense ETFs. The business of destruction—neatly bundled and ready for growth. The Pentagon says: “Fabricated.” Investigations say: “Let’s take a closer look.” And the public says: “Wait… haven’t we seen this movie before?” And then, from nearly a century ago, a voice cuts through the noise—clear, cold, and disturbingly relevant: “War is a racket. It always has been.” —Smedley Darlington Butler  💣 Meanwhile, Back in Reality… While officials debate “fabricati...

The Endurance War: When Pain Becomes Strategy

  There are wars fought with missiles. There are wars fought with money. And then there are wars like this one— where the real battlefield is human endurance , and the real weapon is pain tolerance . The blockade of the Strait of Hormuz is being presented as a masterstroke by —a clean, calculated move to choke Iran’s economic lifeline. But beneath the polished language of “strategic pressure” lies a far simpler, far more uncomfortable truth: This is not a test of power. It is a test of who can suffer longer. And in that contest, Washington may have chosen the wrong opponent. The Fantasy of Economic Collapse The theory is elegant: Strangle oil exports Collapse revenue Trigger unrest Force surrender It is also, historically speaking, remarkably ineffective . A major study by RAND Corporation on coercive economic strategies concluded that: “ Economic sanctions alone rarely achieve major political objectives, particularly against regimes with strong internal sec...

Israel's War Without Strategy: The Biography of a Failure Repeating Itself

  There are wars fought for survival. There are wars fought for power. And then there are wars fought to avoid answering a question. Israel today appears to be fighting the third kind. October 7: The Disaster That Required Questions — And Got None On October 07, atteck , the unthinkable happened. Not just a breach. A collapse. The kind that doesn’t happen because of one missed signal—but because an entire system stops asking the right questions. So naturally, the next step should have been: 👉 A ruthless, transparent, national inquiry 👉 Political accountability at the highest level 👉 Institutional introspection Instead, the system chose a far more innovative response: Move on. Quickly. Loudly. Violently. Because nothing says “we’re learning” like launching a war before finishing the autopsy. And Then… The Same Movie Played Again Fast forward. Hezbollah was declared “finished,” “on its knees,” “neutralized.” Victory speeches were practically warming up in the...

🎭 The Theater of War: Where Jets Fall… and Logic Disappears

  There is something almost magical about modern warfare. Not technological. Not strategic. Magical. Because apparently, in this new era of “precision conflict,” reality itself bends—radars go blind, enemies vanish, and entire rescue operations unfold like a perfectly choreographed Netflix special. Welcome to the latest production by The New York Times: “ A Harrowing Race Against Time to Find a Downed U.S. Airman in Iran.” Harrowing? Yes. Race against time? Sure. But also— a story where physics, military doctrine, and basic logic quietly exit the stage. 🚨 Act I: The Jet That Was “Too Advanced” to Be Shot Down Let’s begin with the uncomfortable opening scene. An American F-15E Strike Eagle—a symbol of air superiority—gets shot down. Not by accident. Not by friendly fire. By Iran. Yes, the same Iran that we are constantly told is: technologically behind militarily constrained barely holding together And yet: 👉 It tracks 👉 Targets 👉 And successfully downs ...