“History doesn’t repeat itself, but it often rhymes.”
— Mark Twain
On June 22, 2025, a series of coordinated U.S. airstrikes leveled key Iranian nuclear facilities. The world changed in an instant.
But this war wasn’t triggered by accident, nor born of necessity. It was the outcome of deliberate pressure, strategic persuasion, and political theater, carried out by a select inner circle that molded President Trump’s hesitancy into decisive—and devastating—action.
So who really pushed Trump to strike? And what forces overrode caution in favor of calculated confrontation?
🧨 The Flashpoint: An Attack on Saudi Soil
The final trigger was an explosive attack—allegedly carried out by Iranian proxies—on critical Saudi oil infrastructure, causing major casualties and energy disruption. The act shocked global markets and shook the White House.
But for some in Trump’s orbit, this wasn’t just an act of aggression—it was an opportunity.
🎯 The Inner Circle of War
1. Mike Pompeo: The Architect of Maximum Pressure
As Secretary of State, Mike Pompeo played the most pivotal role. A long-standing Iran hawk, Pompeo had long dismissed diplomacy and framed the nuclear program as a ticking time bomb.
- He presented disputed intelligence, claiming Iran’s involvement in the Saudi attack was irrefutable.
- He sold the strike as “limited, necessary, and surgical”—a bold way to reassert deterrence.
- To Trump, he framed it as his Reagan moment—projecting strength without full-scale war.
“We can set them back a decade, Mr. President—without boots on the ground.”
2. Robert O’Brien: The Gatekeeper of Options
National Security Advisor Robert O’Brien worked behind the scenes to streamline the decision-making process.
- He filtered intelligence and ensured that military strike options were always on the table.
- He helped portray the mission as a quick, winnable engagement, not a war.
- O'Brien's coordination with the Pentagon ensured the strike looked militarily “clean” and politically palatable.
His job wasn’t to argue—it was to close the deal.
3. Senator Tom Cotton: The External Hammer
From outside the White House, Senator Tom Cotton (R-AR) amplified the war cries.
- Cotton, a fierce Iran hawk, had advocated for bombing Iranian nuclear facilities for nearly a decade.
- He reportedly called Trump directly:
“You’ve been handed the moment history remembers. Are you going to take it—or retreat like Obama did?”
He appealed to Trump’s ego, legacy, and image as the president who never backed down.
🔥 Strategy Over Caution: How Hawks Outflanked the Military
Ignored Warnings from the Pentagon
Despite presenting legitimate fears of escalation, voices like Defense Secretary Mark Esper and General Mark Milley were drowned out.
They warned:
- Iran could retaliate across Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, and the Gulf.
- U.S. troops and embassies were vulnerable.
- A “surgical strike” might only delay, not destroy, Iran’s nuclear capabilities.
But to the hawkish trio of Pompeo, O’Brien, and Cotton—this was the window they had long prepared for. Caution was rebranded as weakness. Diplomacy, dead.
🧠 Psychological Warfare: How Trump Was Persuaded
Trump was not naturally inclined toward another war—especially after campaigning against endless entanglements. But his psychology was the battlefield.
They sold him:
- A limited strike, not war
- A show of strength, not provocation
- A legacy-defining moment, not political risk
And they minimized:
- The chances of Iranian escalation
- The long-term geopolitical blowback
- The real cost to regional stability
🗺️ What Followed: A War for the Ages
Within 36 hours, Iran struck back:
- U.S. air bases in Iraq were shelled.
- Proxies in Lebanon and Syria fired on Israeli positions.
- Oil tankers in the Gulf were attacked.
- The Strait of Hormuz was blockaded, disrupting 20% of global oil supply.
What was promised as a limited response became a regional spiral—exactly what the Pentagon feared.
⚖️ The Real Verdict: Who's to Blame?
This was not a war of necessity.
It was not a war born of overwhelming evidence.
It was a war of ideological ambition, political persuasion, and strategic manipulation.
The triumvirate—Pompeo (chief architect), O’Brien (internal enabler), and Cotton (external amplifier)—engineered a moment they had long desired, and overrode cooler heads in pursuit of regime confrontation.
Trump didn’t plan this war.
He was talked into it.
📌 Final Thought
In the smoke rising from Iranian soil and the rubble of deterrence, one truth becomes painfully clear:
Wars aren't always started by generals.
Sometimes, they’re sold by politicians—one phone call, one briefing, one ego at a time.
By Malik Mukhtar
📖 www.ainnbeen.blogspot.com
Comments