Skip to main content

Speeding Toward the Cliff: How Israel's Moral Cocoon and Western Complicity Are Leading to Catastrophe



By all appearances, Israel is moving at breakneck speed down a perilous path—one marked by moral decay, diplomatic isolation, and deepening violence. And as the war in Gaza rages on, the most troubling realization is not just the scale of destruction, but the willful detachment of Israeli society from its global consequences.

Prominent Israeli commentators and public figures have begun acknowledging this growing moral void. They describe it as a national “cocoon”—a societal state of insulation from international law, from the cries of the occupied, and from the eyes of a watching world. This detachment is not apathy; it is cultivated indifference, a refusal to face the consequences of policies carried out in their name.

One of Israel’s most courageous journalists, Gideon Levy of Haaretz, has warned of this blindness for years:

My modest mission is to prevent a situation in which many Israelis will be able to say 'We didn't know.'”
Gideon Levy, Haaretz

But the truth is out. The world knows. And now, many Israelis simply choose not to care.

This moral numbing is not accidental. As political analyst and public opinion expert Dahlia Scheindlin has argued, the detachment from Gaza’s humanitarian catastrophe is deeply rooted in Israel’s internal political and psychological structures. In her analysis, the ongoing war has revealed:

A profound disconnect between Gaza’s humanitarian reality and Israeli societal attitudes, driven by political polarization, authoritarian governance, and systemic dehumanization of Palestinians.”

Scheindlin contends that genuine acknowledgment of Palestinian suffering requires dismantling deeply entrenched narratives, revitalizing Israel's democratic institutions, and replacing security-obsessed dogma with a renewed moral imperative. Without these foundational shifts, she warns, Israel is doomed to further isolation and perpetual conflict.

Indeed, Israel's ongoing offensive in Gaza—described by many international observers as one of the most devastating modern military campaigns—has continued unabated despite intensifying global condemnation. Hospitals lie in ruins. Famine spreads. Civilians are slaughtered. Yet the Israeli government presses forward with confidence. Why?

Because it is not alone. It is enabled.

For decades, the United States and other Western governments have offered not just political cover, but unconditional military and economic support. Billions in aid. Vetoes at the UN. Diplomatic muscle. These are not symbolic gestures; they are the pillars propping up a regime increasingly accused of crimes against humanity.

And even voices from inside Israel’s own political elite are raising red flags. Jonathan Ben Artzi, the nephew of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, offered a warning over two decades ago that feels chillingly relevant today:

“If Americans are truly our friends, they should shake us up and take the keys—because we are drunk driving. And without such a call, we will find ourselves in a ditch.”
Jonathan Ben Artzi, CNN (2002)

Israel, drunk on impunity, is now behind the wheel of history with no brakesand the ditch is no longer hypothetical.

Former Shin Bet chief Ami Ayalon put it plainly:

Israelis cannot blame the Palestinians for their resistance to the occupation... The only way Israelis will achieve security is when Palestinians have hope.”

But instead of fostering that hope, Israeli policy has systematically crushed it. The people of Gaza are not just besieged—they are being starved. Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich’s horrifying statement advocating for using hunger as a weapon drew condemnation even from allies. British Foreign Secretary David Lammy responded decisively:

“International law could not be more clear — the deliberate starvation of civilians is a war crime.”

In response, the UK suspended free trade talks with Israel. The EU is reportedly considering sanctions. Israel is no longer above scrutiny—but whether it will listen is another matter entirely.

Despite this growing global outrage, Netanyahu’s government has vowed to maintain control of Gaza. The occupation is not temporary. The assault is not tactical. It is existential—and it is being normalized.

That normalization would be impossible without the complicity of allies who preach human rights while turning a blind eye to genocide.

So where does this lead?

It leads to international pariah status. It leads to fractured alliances and lost legitimacy. But worse, it leads to a generational curse—a legacy of moral failure that no amount of security guarantees can erase.

As Scheindlin, Levy, and Ayalon all suggest in their own ways, this crisis is not only about war—it is about what kind of society Israel is becoming, and how long its allies will continue enabling that transformation.

In the words of Gideon Levy, this moment is not just about politics—it is about whether Israelis will one day say: “We didn’t know.”

But they do know. The world knows. And history will remember who stayed silent.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Famine by design, Silence by Choice: 90,000 children are dying and still the UN can't find it's Spine.

  ✍️ By Malik Mukhtar | July 22, 2025 📍 From the graveyard of global morality: Gaza Let’s be clear. If a three-month-old baby named Yehia dies of starvation in his mother’s arms at Nasser Hospital, that should be enough for the world to say: “Enough.” But in today’s U.N., apparently 90,000 malnourished children, daily starvation deaths, and food rotting at the Gaza border still don’t meet the “technical ” threshold for famine . Welcome to the age of data-driven genocide , where unless a corpse is tagged with the right IPC Level 5 barcode , it's not really dead enough to matter. 📉 No Data? No Problem. Just Ignore the Bones. Let’s break this down. The Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) — a bureaucratic tool forged in the fires of humanitarian intention — tells us that famine exists when: 20% of households face extreme food shortage, Acute malnutrition in children exceeds 30%, Deaths exceed 2 per 10,000 per day. But wait — Gaza’s under siege, aid...

🏗️ Corporate Complicity in Genocide: The Global Economy Behind Gaza’s Ruin.

📅 July 5, 2025 “We are witnessing not just genocide in Gaza—but a genocide made profitable.” — UN Special Rapporteur, A/HRC/59/23 “This report is written from the heart of darkness . It is penned with a broken hand from a broken land for a broken people . But its words are not broken . They are the words of law and of longing . They are the words of those who are not yet silenced . It is written for Palestinians , first and foremost. It is also addressed to those who remain silent , indifferent or complicit . And it is a call to action for those who are not.” — Introduction, UN Report A/HRC/59/23 In an unprecedented and unflinching report to the UN Human Rights Council, the Special Rapporteur on the Occupied Palestinian Territory has laid bare the truth that much of the world’s corporate, academic, and financial architecture is actively complicit in Israel’s occupation, apartheid, and now, genocide in Gaza. This isn’t just about military aggression . This is about the mac...

"Globalize the Intifada”—Or How to Offend Power by Naming Its Crimes

  📰 The New York Times and the Art of Grieving Selectively ✍️ By Malik Mukhtar 📍 ainnbeen.blogspot.com 📅 July 2, 2025 Bret Stephens is upset. Again. Apparently, he’s still recovering from Café Moment. And Passover in Netanya. And that one horrific morning in 2004 when he saw carnage on Azza Street. And he has every right to grieve those losses. Every human does. But here’s the thing: Some corpses get columns. Others get erased. Stephens, perched on the prestigious opinion page of The New York Times , just spent a full-length sermon condemning Zohran Mamdani—not for what he said, but for what he refused to denounce: the phrase “ globalize the intifada.” According to Bret, refusing to ritually cleanse your political career with the holy water of pro-Israel respectability is now akin to blessing bus bombings. What “ globalize the intifada” really means, Mr. Stephens, is refusing to accept a world where genocide is livestreamed, and the world just shrugs. It means dari...

“Starving to Death, But Very Politely” — Gaza’s Famine and the Theater of Moral Collapse

📍Blog: ainnbeen.blogspot.com ✍️ By Malik Mukhtar | July 25, 2025 Let us all pause and thank the New York Times . After 21 months of bombing , blockade, and bullets , we finally have permission — no, confirmation — from America’s journal of record that yes, Gazans are, in fact, dying of starvation. The paper even sent reporters to Haifa, Jerusalem, and London — not Gaza, of course — to deliver the news. Skeletal toddlers, lactating mothers without milk, IV drips rationed like treasure — all neatly documented, sanitized, and wrapped in diplomatic passive voice. But fear not. The famine is not the fault of any one side. It's simply the result of “human failings , ” the report says. Ah yes, the tragedy of equal blame . A little siege here, a little looting there — and voilà! Starvation appears like a natural disaster . Like a famine tsunami . No perpetrators. Just poor little victims. Meanwhile, Israel, the world’s most moral occupier™ , is gallantly uploading videos of...

🩸 "If It Were Really Genocide, Wouldn’t More People Be Dead?" — The Cruel Logic of Bret Stephens

  ✍️ By Malik Mukhtar | July 23, 2025 So let’s all take a moment to appreciate the cold brilliance of Bret Stephens , New York Times columnist and self-appointed moral compass for the apocalypse. In his latest masterstroke of ethical reasoning , he argues that the claim of genocide in Gaza rings hollow — not because tens of thousands haven’t been killed , but because not enough have. “It may seem harsh to say, but there is a glaring dissonance to the charge that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza.” “If the Israeli government’s intentions and actions are truly genocidal — if it is so malevolent that it is committed to the annihilation of Gazans — why hasn’t it been more methodical and vastly more deadly?” Ah yes, the ol’ “ not genocidal enough” defense — a timeless classic. You see, according to Stephens, genocide must be more “ methodical ,” more “ deadly .” A mere 60,000 deaths (as reported by Gaza’s health ministry) over two years of war doesn’t meet the qu...