Speeding Toward the Cliff: How Israel's Moral Cocoon and Western Complicity Are Leading to Catastrophe

By all appearances, Israel is moving at breakneck speed down a perilous path—one marked by moral decay, diplomatic isolation, and deepening violence. And as the war in Gaza rages on, the most troubling realization is not just the scale of destruction, but the willful detachment of Israeli society from its global consequences.

Prominent Israeli commentators and public figures have begun acknowledging this growing moral void. They describe it as a national “cocoon”—a societal state of insulation from international law, from the cries of the occupied, and from the eyes of a watching world. This detachment is not apathy; it is cultivated indifference, a refusal to face the consequences of policies carried out in their name.

One of Israel’s most courageous journalists, Gideon Levy of Haaretz, has warned of this blindness for years:

“My modest mission is to prevent a situation in which many Israelis will be able to say 'We didn't know.'”
— Gideon Levy, Haaretz

But the truth is out. The world knows. And now, many Israelis simply choose not to care.

This moral numbing is not accidental. As political analyst and public opinion expert Dahlia Scheindlin has argued, the detachment from Gaza’s humanitarian catastrophe is deeply rooted in Israel’s internal political and psychological structures. In her analysis, the ongoing war has revealed:

“A profound disconnect between Gaza’s humanitarian reality and Israeli societal attitudes, driven by political polarization, authoritarian governance, and systemic dehumanization of Palestinians.”

Scheindlin contends that genuine acknowledgment of Palestinian suffering requires dismantling deeply entrenched narratives, revitalizing Israel's democratic institutions, and replacing security-obsessed dogma with a renewed moral imperative. Without these foundational shifts, she warns, Israel is doomed to further isolation and perpetual conflict.

Indeed, Israel's ongoing offensive in Gaza—described by many international observers as one of the most devastating modern military campaigns—has continued unabated despite intensifying global condemnation. Hospitals lie in ruins. Famine spreads. Civilians are slaughtered. Yet the Israeli government presses forward with confidence. Why?

Because it is not alone. It is enabled.

For decades, the United States and other Western governments have offered not just political cover, but unconditional military and economic support. Billions in aid. Vetoes at the UN. Diplomatic muscle. These are not symbolic gestures; they are the pillars propping up a regime increasingly accused of crimes against humanity.

And even voices from inside Israel’s own political elite are raising red flags. Jonathan Ben Artzi, the nephew of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, offered a warning over two decades ago that feels chillingly relevant today:

“If Americans are truly our friends, they should shake us up and take the keys—because we are drunk driving. And without such a call, we will find ourselves in a ditch.”
— Jonathan Ben Artzi, CNN (2002)

Israel, drunk on impunity, is now behind the wheel of history with no brakes—and the ditch is no longer hypothetical.

Former Shin Bet chief Ami Ayalon put it plainly:

“Israelis cannot blame the Palestinians for their resistance to the occupation... The only way Israelis will achieve security is when Palestinians have hope.”

But instead of fostering that hope, Israeli policy has systematically crushed it. The people of Gaza are not just besieged—they are being starved. Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich’s horrifying statement advocating for using hunger as a weapon drew condemnation even from allies. British Foreign Secretary David Lammy responded decisively:

“International law could not be more clear — the deliberate starvation of civilians is a war crime.”

In response, the UK suspended free trade talks with Israel. The EU is reportedly considering sanctions. Israel is no longer above scrutiny—but whether it will listen is another matter entirely.

Despite this growing global outrage, Netanyahu’s government has vowed to maintain control of Gaza. The occupation is not temporary. The assault is not tactical. It is existential—and it is being normalized.

That normalization would be impossible without the complicity of allies who preach human rights while turning a blind eye to genocide.

So where does this lead?

It leads to international pariah status. It leads to fractured alliances and lost legitimacy. But worse, it leads to a generational curse—a legacy of moral failure that no amount of security guarantees can erase.

As Scheindlin, Levy, and Ayalon all suggest in their own ways, this crisis is not only about war—it is about what kind of society Israel is becoming, and how long its allies will continue enabling that transformation.

In the words of Gideon Levy, this moment is not just about politics—it is about whether Israelis will one day say: “We didn’t know.”

But they do know. The world knows. And history will remember who stayed silent.

Comments

🔥 Gaza and the Grammar of Death: Achille Mbembe’s Necropolitics in the Age of Engineered Survival

By Malik Mukhtar (Full-Length Version with Mbembe Quotations) There are historical moments when the ordinary vocabulary of violence collapses . When “ conflict ,” “ occupation ,” and “ security ” no longer carry the weight required to explain what is unfolding before our eyes. Gaza is one such moment — a rupture in the moral architecture of the present. It is not simply a battlefield. It is an experiment in state-administered dying , in what Achille Mbembe named necropolitic s — the transformation of political power into the authority to dictate who may live and who must die. In Necropolitics (2003), Mbembe writes: “ The ultimate expression of sovereignty resides… in the power and the capacity to dictate who may live and who must die.” — Achille Mbembe, Necropolitics For Gaza, this is not theory. This is the daily grammar of existence. My book, Calculus of Survival: Necropolitics, Siege, and the Deionization of Life in Gaza , is situated squarely within this reality —...

The Leak That Broke the Mirror: Israel’s Moral Collapse at Sde Teiman

n R It was not the torture that shocked Israel. It was the fact that someone leaked it. Welcome to Sde Teiman — the desert detention camp that became a mirror to Israel’s moral decay, and to the world’s selective blindness. The Scene of the Crime The story begins, like most horror stories do these days, with a camera. On July 5, 2024, security footage inside the Sde Teiman military base caught what it was never meant to record: a Palestinian prisoner, blindfolded, bound, and dragged across the floor by Israeli soldiers. Moments later, the soldiers raised shields to block the camera — and behind that human wall, the real Israel revealed itself. When the shields dropped , the man lay broken: seven fractured ribs, a punctured lung, and a torn rectum so severe it required surgery and a colostomy. The anatomy of cruelty was complete. The Scandal That Wasn’t You would think such a crime would set off national outrage. But in Israel’s political universe , torture is an...

The World as Gaza: Necropolitics and the Calculus of Survival

“ The ultimate expression of sovereignty resides in the power and the capacity to dictate who may live and who must die.” — Achille Mbembe, “Necropolitics” There are philosophies that dissect history, and there are philosophies that bleed through it. Achille Mbembe’s Necropolitics belongs to the latter — it is not an academic exercise, but a diagnosis of the world’s moral decay. In his words, modern sovereignty is no longer about governing life — it is about managing death . It decides who is allowed to breathe, who must suffocate, and who will exist in the space between. Nowhere is this calculus of death more visible, more technologically refined, and more ethically bankrupt than in Palestine . The siege of Gaza has transformed necropolitics from theory into geography — a place where the architecture of control and the arithmetic of survival intersect. The Right to Kill, the Duty to Let Die In Necropolitics , Mbembe extends Foucault’s biopower — the power to “...

The Science of Fear: How Islamophobia Became a Campaign Strategy

When Zohran Mamdani stood before a roaring crowd and declared, “ No more will New York be a city where you can traffic in Islamophobia and win an election,” he wasn’t just celebrating victory — he was delivering a eulogy for a long, poisonous political playbook. Because let’s face it — Islamophobia has never just been about prejudice. It’s been a strategy — polished, funded, and weaponized into one of the most successful vote-getting formulas in modern politics. The Machinery of Fear The arithmetic is simple — and sinister . Take a minority that makes up barely 2% of the U.S. population . Turn them into the symbolic threat for the other 98%. Feed that fear with millions of dollars , wrap it in the flag , and sell it as “security. ” According to a 2021 CAIR report , more than $105 million was funneled to just 26 anti-Muslim organizations between 2017 and 2019 — money laundered through “ mainstream charitable ” institutions. That’s not democracy in action. That’...

How to Oppose Annexation Without Actually Opposing It: The Trump Doctrine of Elegant Hypocrisy

The Art of Saying No While Handing Over the Keys: Trump’s De Facto Annexation Gift to Israel Ah yes — the era of “ principled diplomacy.” The Trump administration, that self-proclaimed guardian of “fairness” in the Middle East, will forever be remembered for its masterclass in political double-speak — a rare performance where the United States verbally opposed Israel’s annexation of the West Bank while physically laying down the red carpet for it. It’s like saying, “ Please, don’t steal the car,” while quietly tossing over the keys, disabling the alarm, and complimenting the thief’s driving skills. The Great Paradox — or Just the Great Performance? Let’s call it what it was: a paradox of diplomacy , or perhaps more accurately , a farce performed for global consumption . In words , the Trump administration urged restraint — telling Netanyahu that annexation should be “coordinated,” “negotiated,” and “timed wisely.” In reality , it was busy dismantling every legal and dip...

Ainnbeen

Search This Blog