Skip to main content

The Double Standard: A Jewish Dilemma in the Face of Injustice



In a revealing New Yorker interview, Holocaust historian and Biden appointee Deborah Lipstadt appeared to defend Trump’s crackdowns on pro-Palestinian student activists. Critics were quick to notice the irony—and danger—of using the fight against antisemitism to justify the suppression of political dissent.

As New York Times columnist Michelle Goldberg wrote in response:

"It seems to me that there’s another sort of derangement at play here, rooted in the way Israel’s defenders conflate all but the mildest criticism of Israel with antisemitism."

This post explores how political actors, and even respected Jewish intellectuals, are using antisemitism as a shield—not for Jewish safety, but for political gain—and why the silence of the Jewish majority in the face of injustice is a moral crisis.


Judaism’s Ethical Tradition—and Its Silence Today

From childhood, Jews around the world are raised with powerful moral lessons: never forget the Holocaust, speak out against injustice, never stand idle while another suffers. These values echo through synagogues, schools, homes, and playgrounds.

Yet, as Gaza burns before the world's eyes, with civilians enduring immense suffering, many Jewish institutions and voices remain silent—or worse, complicit. Speaking out is often met with condemnation. Criticism of Israel is labeled antisemitic. Dissent is punished, not debated.

Why?

Because a dangerous idea has taken root: that opposing the policies of the Israeli state is equivalent to betraying Jewish identity.


The Argument of “The Un-Jews”

This idea is perhaps most forcefully argued by Natan Sharansky and Gil Troy in their article “The Un-Jews” for Tablet Magazine.

They write that Jews who reject Zionism or openly criticize Israel are effectively abandoning Jewish peoplehood. They frame such dissenters as betraying their roots, their history, and their identity.

The Un-Jew doesn’t merely criticize Israeli policies; he repudiates the Jewish people’s national identity and connection to the land of Israel.”

This ideological framework equates Zionism with Judaism itself—leaving no space for critique, moral questioning, or political diversity within the Jewish world. It reduces a millennia-old ethical tradition to a nationalist allegiance.


The Weaponization of Antisemitism

In this climate, antisemitism is no longer a shield for the vulnerableit is a weapon for the powerful.

This rhetorical sleight-of-hand silences university students, Muslim voices, Jewish dissenters, and international human rights organizations. It enables politicians to crack down on critics of Israeli policy under the guise of "protecting Jews," even as actual far-right antisemitism festers in plain sight.

This isn’t about protecting Jews. It’s about protecting power.


Judaism Is Not a Nationalist Ideology

Judaism has always been more than a nation-state. It is a religion rooted in ethical responsibility, moral inquiry, and relentless questioning. From the prophets of ancient Israel to the rabbis of the Talmud, Jewish tradition has honored those who challenge kings and call out injustice.

To conflate Judaism with the state of Israel is to flatten its complexity and deny its soul.


Jewish Dissent Is Not Betrayal—It Is Faithfulness

Jews around the world are speaking out. Groups like Jewish Voice for Peace, IfNotNow, and others are reclaiming the moral heart of Judaism. They argue that standing against the siege of Gaza is not abandonment—it is the very fulfillment of Jewish values.

They remind us:

To be Jewish is not to stand with power. It is to stand with justice.


Conclusion: A Call to Moral Clarity

We are witnessing one of the worst atrocities of our time. What we do—or fail to do—will echo for generations.

Silence is complicity. And for those trying to cancel voices of dissent in the name of Jewish identity, let this be clear: Judaism cannot be reduced to blind loyalty. It is a living tradition of moral clarity.

To stand for justice in Palestine is not antisemitism. It is Judaism.


Tags:
#JudaismAndJustice #FreePalestine #DeborahLipstadt #MichelleGoldberg #Zionism #JewishDissent #PalestineSolidarity #TheUnJews #JewishVoiceForPeace #IfNotNow #IsraelGaza #HumanRights

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When the Warning Comes from the General Moshe Ya’alon, Jewish Supremacy, and the Echo Nobody Wanted to Hear

History has a cruel sense of irony. Sometimes the most devastating indictments do not come from the oppressed, the bombed, the buried, or the silenced—but from the very architects of power who once swore they were different. This week, that indictment came from Moshe Ya’alon : former Israeli Defense Minister, former IDF Chief of Staff, lifelong pillar of Israel’s security establishment. Not a dissident poet. Not a radical academic. Not a Palestinian survivor. A general. And what he said shattered the last polite illusion. “ The ideology of Jewish supremacy that has become dominant in the Israeli government is reminiscent of Nazi race theory.” Pause there. Sit with it. This was not shouted at a protest . It was not scribbled on a placard. It was written calmly, deliberately, after attending a Holocaust Remembrance ceremony —then reading reports of Jewish settlers attacking Palestinians , blocking ambulances , fracturing skulls , burning homes. Never Again, apparently, now ...

A Rabbi Against the State: When Faith Refuses Power

In a world where identity is weaponized and religion is drafted into political armies, the sight of an ultra-Orthodox rabbi standing beside Palestinian flags unsettles nearly everyone. Yet there stands — black coat, beard, sidelocks — calmly declaring something that scrambles modern assumptions: “ Judaism is not Zionism.” For him, this is not rebellion . It is obedience . Affiliated with , a small and highly controversial Haredi sect, Rabbi Beck represents a theological current that predates modern nationalism. His argument is not secular. It is not progressive. It is not post-modern. It is ancient . And that is precisely the point. The Interview That Disturbs Categories In one widely circulated long-form interview, the exchange unfolds with almost disarming simplicity. Interviewer: Rabbi Beck, how can you oppose Israel as a Jewish rabbi? Rabbi Beck: Judaism and Zionism are two completely different things. Judaism is a religion. Zionism is a political movement founded little more ...

“Not Auschwitz — Yet Still Genocide”: When Israeli Holocaust Historians Break the Silence on Gaza

  There are moments in history when the most unsettling truths do not come from one’s enemies, but from within. From those who know the past most intimately. From those whose moral authority is built not on ideology, but on memory. In December 2025, two of Israel’s most respected Holocaust and genocide scholars— Prof. Daniel Blatman and Prof. Amos Goldberg of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem—published a deeply unsettling opinion article in Haaretz . What they argued was not casual, rhetorical, or activist hyperbole. It was a grave historical judgment. Their conclusion was stark: What is happening in Gaza is not Auschwitz. But it belongs to the same family of crimes: genocide. Why This Voice Matters Blatman and Goldberg are not marginal figures. They are historians whose professional lives have been devoted to studying Nazi crimes, genocide mechanisms, memory, and moral responsibility . Their scholarship is rooted in the very catastrophe that shaped modern Jewish iden...

Even the Dead Are Not Safe: How Power Desecrates Graves and Calls It Security

  There is a final dignity that every civilization, every faith, every moral tradition claims to respect: the dignity of the dead. In Gaza and the West Bank, even that has been revoked. Homes can be flattened. Children can be starved. Hospitals can be reduced to ash. These crimes, we are told, are “tragic necessities.” But graves ? What threat does a corpse pose to a modern army armed with drones , tanks , and nuclear ambiguity ? Apparently, enough to be bulldozed. Graves as Enemy Infrastructure According to detailed reporting by Al Jazeera , Israeli forces in Gaza did not merely fight the living — they waged war on cemeteries . Tombstones were crushed. Graves were excavated . Human remains were scattered, mixed, lost . Families returned not to mourning, but to forensic horror: bones without names, names without bodies. This was not collateral damage . This was not crossfire. This was methodical excavation . Heavy machinery was deployed to retrieve the body of one ...

Don’t Spoil the Show: Gaza, Davos, and the Business Class of Peace

There is a rule at Davos—unwritten, but strictly enforced. Reality is bad for business. Yossi Alpher learned this the hard way. Sitting on a panel at a luxury resort near the Dead Sea, surrounded by ministers, executives, and conflict “experts,” he made the unforgivable mistake of speaking honestly. Grim facts. Grim assessments. No PowerPoint optimism. No Riviera renderings. No applause. A prominent Israeli industrialist later pulled him aside and explained the crime: “ Don’t spoil the show . The idea is to radiate optimism that nourishes an investment climate . It’s all about business. No room for realism .” That sentence may be the most accurate peace-process doctrine of the 21st century. Phase II: Now With Billionaires Fast forward to Davos again. This time, the stage is Gaza—or rather, Gaza™ , the investment opportunity. Trump’s “Board of Peace,” staffed by billionaires and brand managers of global destruction , announces Phase II of a Gaza peace plan with all the s...