Skip to main content

The Double Standard: A Jewish Dilemma in the Face of Injustice



In a revealing New Yorker interview, Holocaust historian and Biden appointee Deborah Lipstadt appeared to defend Trump’s crackdowns on pro-Palestinian student activists. Critics were quick to notice the irony—and danger—of using the fight against antisemitism to justify the suppression of political dissent.

As New York Times columnist Michelle Goldberg wrote in response:

"It seems to me that there’s another sort of derangement at play here, rooted in the way Israel’s defenders conflate all but the mildest criticism of Israel with antisemitism."

This post explores how political actors, and even respected Jewish intellectuals, are using antisemitism as a shield—not for Jewish safety, but for political gain—and why the silence of the Jewish majority in the face of injustice is a moral crisis.


Judaism’s Ethical Tradition—and Its Silence Today

From childhood, Jews around the world are raised with powerful moral lessons: never forget the Holocaust, speak out against injustice, never stand idle while another suffers. These values echo through synagogues, schools, homes, and playgrounds.

Yet, as Gaza burns before the world's eyes, with civilians enduring immense suffering, many Jewish institutions and voices remain silent—or worse, complicit. Speaking out is often met with condemnation. Criticism of Israel is labeled antisemitic. Dissent is punished, not debated.

Why?

Because a dangerous idea has taken root: that opposing the policies of the Israeli state is equivalent to betraying Jewish identity.


The Argument of “The Un-Jews”

This idea is perhaps most forcefully argued by Natan Sharansky and Gil Troy in their article “The Un-Jews” for Tablet Magazine.

They write that Jews who reject Zionism or openly criticize Israel are effectively abandoning Jewish peoplehood. They frame such dissenters as betraying their roots, their history, and their identity.

The Un-Jew doesn’t merely criticize Israeli policies; he repudiates the Jewish people’s national identity and connection to the land of Israel.”

This ideological framework equates Zionism with Judaism itself—leaving no space for critique, moral questioning, or political diversity within the Jewish world. It reduces a millennia-old ethical tradition to a nationalist allegiance.


The Weaponization of Antisemitism

In this climate, antisemitism is no longer a shield for the vulnerableit is a weapon for the powerful.

This rhetorical sleight-of-hand silences university students, Muslim voices, Jewish dissenters, and international human rights organizations. It enables politicians to crack down on critics of Israeli policy under the guise of "protecting Jews," even as actual far-right antisemitism festers in plain sight.

This isn’t about protecting Jews. It’s about protecting power.


Judaism Is Not a Nationalist Ideology

Judaism has always been more than a nation-state. It is a religion rooted in ethical responsibility, moral inquiry, and relentless questioning. From the prophets of ancient Israel to the rabbis of the Talmud, Jewish tradition has honored those who challenge kings and call out injustice.

To conflate Judaism with the state of Israel is to flatten its complexity and deny its soul.


Jewish Dissent Is Not Betrayal—It Is Faithfulness

Jews around the world are speaking out. Groups like Jewish Voice for Peace, IfNotNow, and others are reclaiming the moral heart of Judaism. They argue that standing against the siege of Gaza is not abandonment—it is the very fulfillment of Jewish values.

They remind us:

To be Jewish is not to stand with power. It is to stand with justice.


Conclusion: A Call to Moral Clarity

We are witnessing one of the worst atrocities of our time. What we do—or fail to do—will echo for generations.

Silence is complicity. And for those trying to cancel voices of dissent in the name of Jewish identity, let this be clear: Judaism cannot be reduced to blind loyalty. It is a living tradition of moral clarity.

To stand for justice in Palestine is not antisemitism. It is Judaism.


Tags:
#JudaismAndJustice #FreePalestine #DeborahLipstadt #MichelleGoldberg #Zionism #JewishDissent #PalestineSolidarity #TheUnJews #JewishVoiceForPeace #IfNotNow #IsraelGaza #HumanRights

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Dr. Randa Abdel Fattah. De-Invited by Association: When Grief Becomes a Pretext and Palestinian Identity a Liability

How Dr. Randa Abdel-Fattah Was Silenced in the Name of “Sensitivity” In a remarkable feat of moral gymnastics, Australia’s literary establishment has once again demonstrated how grief can be weaponised, principles suspended, and Palestinian identity rendered dangerously “inappropriate ” —all in the name of cultural sensitivity. Dr. Randa Abdel-Fattah , a respected author, academic, and public intellectual, was quietly de-invited from Adelaide Writers’ Week following the Bondi Junction massacre. Not because she had any connection—real, implied, or imagined—to the atrocity. Not because she endorsed violence. Not because she violated any law or ethical standard. But because, apparently, the mere presence of a Palestinian Muslim woman who speaks about justice is now considered culturally unsafe during national mourning . One wonders: unsafe for whom? The Logic of the Absurd Festival organisers were careful—almost impressively so—to state that Dr. Abdel-Fattah had nothing to do wi...

Ana Kasparian: The Voice That Won’t Be Silent — A Call for Truth in an Age of Power

  Ana Kasparian is one of the most recognized and outspoken voices in contemporary political media. As a co-host of The Young Turks — a trailblazing online news and commentary program — she has spent nearly two decades dissecting U.S. politics, media, power, and foreign policy with unapologetic clarity and fierce conviction. She is not just a commentator — she is a truth-seeker who challenges power at every turn , refusing to soften her words for comfort. Schooled in journalism and political science, Ana’s commentary continues to mobilize millions, especially younger generations who feel unheard in mainstream discourse. A Voice Against the Status Quo Ana’s rhetoric can be bold, controversial, and deeply passionate — because she refuses to accept narratives that obscure the underlying truth about power and influence. On American democracy and foreign policy, she strikes at the heart of what many hesitate to articulate: “ We don’t actually live in a true democracy here in t...

Gaza and the Collapse of World Order: When the Guardian of Human Rights Sounds the Alarm

There are moments when the language of diplomacy fails, when caution becomes complicity, and when silence becomes an accomplice to destruction. On January 9, 2026, Agnès Callamard—Secretary General of Amnesty International—crossed that threshold. Her words were unambiguous, unprecedented, and devastating: The United States is destroying world order. Israel has been doing so for the last two years. Germany, through complicity and repression, is helping govern its demise. This was not activist rhetoric. It was a diagnosis from the very institution tasked with guarding the moral and legal architecture of the modern world. The Collapse of the Post-War Moral Architecture The international order that emerged after World War II was built on a promise: never again . Never again genocide. Never again collective punishment. Never again impunity for powerful states. That promise was codified in international law, human rights conventions, and multilateral institutions. But Gaza has...

Rebranding Genocide: When Killing Learns New Words

  There are moments in history when crimes do not end — they simply learn new language. Gaza is living inside such a moment. The bombs have not stopped falling. The children have not stopped dying. The displaced have not stopped freezing in tents pitched atop rubble that was once their homes. What has changed is the vocabulary . And in the modern age, vocabulary is power . If you can rename atrocity, you can anesthetize conscience. First, it was called self-defense — a phrase emptied of meaning by its repetition. Then it became a war , despite the grotesque imbalance: one side armed with one of the most advanced militaries on earth, backed by the world’s most powerful empire ; the other a besieged civilian population without an army, navy, air force, tanks, or safe shelter. Now it is branded a ceasefire — a word invoked not to stop violence, but to conceal it. This is not peace. It is genocide with a quieter soundtrack. The Illusion of Restraint A slowed rate of killing is not m...

Citizens on Paper, Expendable in Practice Arab Israelis, October 7, and the Failure of International Law Inside the “Only Democracy”

  Israel tells the world it is the only democracy in the Middle East . Democracies, we are reminded, protect all citizens equally—especially minorities—especially in times of crisis. Now look at Palestinian citizens of Israel , roughly 20% of the population , in the months following October 7 . Then ask: what exactly does citizenship mean when the state will not protect your life? The Forgotten Fifth of the Population Arab citizens of Israel vote. They hold passports. They pay taxes. They are citizens in the narrow, bureaucratic sense. But international law does not define citizenship by paperwork. It defines it by: Equal protection Non-discrimination The right to life Equal access to justice On those measures, Israel is not merely failing—it is structurally violating its obligations . A Murder Epidemic the State Chooses Not to Stop Long before October 7, Arab towns inside Israel were drowning in violence: Illegal weapons proliferated Organized crime flourished ...