Smotrich’s Statement on Hostages: Political Honesty or Cold Betrayal?

Bezalel Smotrich.

In a moment that sent shockwaves through Israeli society, Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich openly declared that bringing home the remaining hostages in Gaza is not the government’s top priority. Speaking on Galey Israel Radio, he claimed, “We have to say the truth… If you want to destroy Hamas so that there can’t be another October 7, you need to understand that there can’t be a situation where Hamas remains in Gaza.”

While Smotrich insists the hostages' return is "very important," his phrasing—and the apparent shift in government priorities—drew immediate fire.

The Hostage and Missing Families Forum responded with fury, accusing the government of giving up on its citizens. “Shame,” they wrote. “History will remember how you closed your heart.”

Family members of hostages took to social media. Einav Zangauker, whose son Matan remains captive, denounced Smotrich’s “messianic and psychopathic delusions.” Lishay Miran-Lavi, wife of hostage Omri Miran, sarcastically thanked him for “saying publicly what the prime minister is afraid to say.”

Even within Smotrich’s own coalition, backlash was swift. MK Moshe Gafni of United Torah Judaism rejected the minister’s stance, calling it reminiscent of ancient zealots who prized national ideology over human life. Smotrich fired back, accusing Gafni of a “diaspora mindset” and asserting that the war’s end goal is to save lives.

Opposition figures went further. Yair Golan likened Smotrich’s position to offering “human sacrifices” on the altar of religious zeal. Yisrael Beytenu’s Avigdor Liberman reminded the public that Smotrich once called Hamas “an asset.” And Yesh Atid’s Yorai Lahav-Hertzano declared he and Smotrich “are not part of the same people.”

Currently, 59 hostages remain in Gaza. Of them, 24 are believed to be alive, awaiting a deal that stalled after Israel resumed military operations in March. Despite increasing public support for a deal—even at the cost of ending the war—the government remains firm. Netanyahu insists there will be no peace until Hamas is toppled.

But as the days go on and hope fades, many in Israel are asking: At what cost?

Comments

Ceasefires, Fireworks, and the Fine Art of Calling Ashes “Peace”

There is something almost poetic about declaring victory while the smoke is still rising. Not poetic in the romantic sense—more in the way a press release can be mistaken for reality if repeated often enough. So here we are. Another “ceasefire.” Another “agreement.” Another feather in the ever-expanding, never-examined peacemaking cap of Donald Trump . Israel–Iran. Israel–Hezbollah. Israel–Hamas. One could be forgiven for thinking peace has broken out everywhere—if peace meant pauses between airstrikes . The Theater of Victory On cue, Benjamin Netanyahu steps forward, flanked by ministers who speak the language of triumph as if it were immune to contradiction. “Iran weakened.” “Hezbollah contained.” “Total victory.” It all sounds remarkably similar to past declarations—just before the next round of fighting. Because here’s the inconvenient detail buried beneath the applause: none of the stated objectives were actually achieved. Iran still has its missiles. Hezboll...

The Endurance War: When Pain Becomes Strategy

There are wars fought with missiles. There are wars fought with money. And then there are wars like this one— where the real battlefield is human endurance , and the real weapon is pain tolerance . The blockade of the Strait of Hormuz is being presented as a masterstroke by —a clean, calculated move to choke Iran’s economic lifeline. But beneath the polished language of “strategic pressure” lies a far simpler, far more uncomfortable truth: This is not a test of power. It is a test of who can suffer longer. And in that contest, Washington may have chosen the wrong opponent. The Fantasy of Economic Collapse The theory is elegant: Strangle oil exports Collapse revenue Trigger unrest Force surrender It is also, historically speaking, remarkably ineffective . A major study by RAND Corporation on coercive economic strategies concluded that: “ Economic sanctions alone rarely achieve major political objectives, particularly against regimes with strong internal sec...

When a Constitution Becomes a Decorative Document America’s Latest War, and the Curious Death of Accountability

There is an imperial comedy unfolding before the world — dark enough to be tragedy, absurd enough to be satire. This is, after all, the very “model democracy” United States has spent decades promising to export to humanity — by missile, by occupation, by sanctions, by “shock and awe,” by solemn lectures on liberty delivered from polished podiums standing atop broken nations. This was the sermon preached to Iraq. Imposed on Afghanistan. Invoked amid the destruction of Libya . Entangled in the agony of Syria. Echoed through the devastation of Yemen. The doctrine was always wrapped in noble language: Rule of law. Democratic institutions. Constitutional order. Checks and balances. How magnificent those words sound — right up until power decides they are optional at home. What a remarkable export product: A democracy where Congress yields, courts hesitate, executive power expands, wars begin first and legal arguments arrive later — wrapped in flags, marketed...

The Confession Without Consequence When Empire Admits the Crime… and Funds It Anyway

There are moments in history when power accidentally tells the truth. Not because conscience triumphs. Not because morality suddenly awakens. But because the wreckage becomes too vast to keep describing as “complicated.” That moment arrived when — a pillar of Washington’s foreign policy establishment, veteran diplomat, architect of negotiations, insider to empire’s machinery — uttered words that would once have been politically unthinkable: “ Prime Minister Netanyahu has led us down a road — and we have been part of it — that has, in essence, created a genocide in Gaza that has destabilize d the Middle East.” Read that again. Not they . We. Not Israel alone . We have been part of it. That single phrase — “we have been part of it” — may be one of the most consequential admissions made by a former senior American official in modern Middle Eastern history. For decades, Washington supplied the bombs, shielded the diplomacy, vetoed accountability, framed slaughter as...

When the Readers Move Ahead of the Columnist

There is something quietly seismic happening—not in the corridors of power, not in carefully worded opinion columns, but in the comment sections beneath them. While attempts to diagnose where Israel “lost its way,” the readers seem to be asking a far more unsettling question: What if it didn’t lose its way at all? What if this is the way? For decades, the comforting narrative was simple: the problem was leadership. Replace , and the moral arc would gently correct itself. Peace would again become plausible. Restraint would return. The “real Israel” would re-emerge. But the readers are no longer convinced. They are pointing to something deeper—something less convenient. Not a deviation. A pattern. Not an exception. A structure. Because when policies persist across decades, across governments, across crises—at what point do we stop calling them mistakes and start calling them design? The Quiet Collapse of a Narrative One reader puts it bluntly: Palestinians have alr...

Ainnbeen

Search This Blog