“Never Again” for Everyone: Holocaust Survivors Speak Out Against Gaza War.

Introduction

As we mark Yom HaShoah, a sacred day to remember the six million Jews murdered during the Holocaust, a powerful countermovement is gaining ground. Survivors and their descendants are speaking out—not just in remembrance, but in resistance.

Their message:

“Never again” must mean never again for anyone.

A Day of Memory Meets a Moment of Crisis

This year’s commemoration coincides with the 80th anniversary of the liberation of Bergen-Belsen. But in London and beyond, some Jewish voices are breaking with traditional ceremonies to raise urgent alarms about Israel’s ongoing war in Gaza, which has claimed over 51,000 Palestinian lives since October 2023.

“I can’t think of a better commemoration for the six million,”
— Mark Etkind, son of a Holocaust survivor

The Danger of Political Co-option

At last year’s Yom HaShoah, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu declared,

“Never again is now,”
linking the Holocaust to Hamas’s deadly attacks. Survivors like Agnes Kory and Stephen Kapos are pushing back:

“I am outraged and deeply insulted by the Holocaust being used as an excuse for Israel’s relentless war,”
— Agnes Kory, Holocaust survivor

Voices of Dissent in the Jewish Community

From carrying placards to signing open letters, Holocaust survivors and descendants are at the forefront of pro-Palestinian protests in London:

“They conflate Jewishness with what they are doing… it inevitably increases antisemitism,”
— Stephen Kapos

Yet the official Jewish institutions in the UK, such as the Board of Deputies and Chief Rabbi’s Office, have remained staunchly aligned with Israel—until recently.

A group of 36 board members published an open letter in the Financial Times condemning Israel’s actions, stating:

“Our Jewish values compel us to stand up and speak out.”

Their courage was met with suspension and disciplinary actions.

Resisting in Their Name

For many survivors, the misuse of Holocaust memory is not only offensive but dangerous. It risks validating oppression and perpetuating cycles of violence under the guise of historical justice.

“The abuse of the Holocaust by Zionism is one of the great crimes against humanity,”
— Haim Bresheeth, Israeli academic and son of Auschwitz survivors

Conclusion: Memory as Moral Compass

The survivors and their families are clear: to honor the victims of the Holocaust is to resist the oppression of any people, anywhere.

As candles burn in remembrance this Yom HaShoah, these voices remind us:

"To remember the Holocaust is to ensure it is never used to justify harm."

Comments

A Rabbi Against the State: When Faith Refuses Power

In a world where identity is weaponized and religion is drafted into political armies, the sight of an ultra-Orthodox rabbi standing beside Palestinian flags unsettles nearly everyone. Yet there stands — black coat, beard, sidelocks — calmly declaring something that scrambles modern assumptions: “ Judaism is not Zionism.” For him, this is not rebellion . It is obedience . Affiliated with , a small and highly controversial Haredi sect, Rabbi Beck represents a theological current that predates modern nationalism. His argument is not secular. It is not progressive. It is not post-modern. It is ancient . And that is precisely the point. The Interview That Disturbs Categories In one widely circulated long-form interview, the exchange unfolds with almost disarming simplicity. Interviewer: Rabbi Beck, how can you oppose Israel as a Jewish rabbi? Rabbi Beck: Judaism and Zionism are two completely different things. Judaism is a religion. Zionism is a political movement founded little more ...

The High Priest of “Serious” Wars Discovers Bibi

There was a time when rode into every Middle Eastern catastrophe like a TED Talk with a press pass. If there was a war to explain, a regime to modernize, or a “vital message” to send with cruise missiles, Tom was there — sleeves rolled up, metaphors polished. Back when the invasion of was sold as a democratic software update, Friedman wasn’t exactly storming the barricades. He was midwifing “creative destruction.” The region would be shocked into sanity. History would bend toward market reform. Fast forward. Now he’s discovered that might be bending something else entirely. When an Ex–Prime Minister Uses the Words “Ethnic Cleansing” What jolts Friedman’s latest column is not campus rhetoric. Not activist slogans. Not fringe NGOs. It’s — a former Israeli prime minister — using language that once would have detonated diplomatic careers. Olmert wrote in Haaretz that: “A violent and criminal effort is underway to ethnically cleanse territories in the West Bank.” Let...

Sanctions, Selective Morality, and the War That Never Ends

On Feb. 28, 2026, The Editorial Board of NYTimes warned that President Trump’s latest strike on Iran was reckless, unconstitutional, and strategically undefined. The board expressed concern for “the many innocent Iranians who have long suffered.” Eleven days earlier, on Feb. 17, 2026, wrote something even more explosive: “ Israel’s far-right government, led by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, is spitting in America’s face and telling us it’s raining. It’s not raining. Bibi is playing both President Trump and American Jews for fools.” Friedman was not questioning Israel’s right to defend itself. He was questioning whether American power was being drawn into a strategy shaped less by U.S. national interest and more by Israel’s domestic political calculus. That distinction matters. Iran as the Permanent External Threat For over four decades, Iran has been under American sanctions. Since 1979, layers of financial, oil, trade, and banking restrictions have been impo...

Blood in the Car Park: Islamophobia and the Fear That Follows Us to Prayer

On a cold February evening in 2026, 18-year-old Zeeshan Afzal was stabbed to death in the parking lot of Oldbury Jamia Masjid, near Birmingham. He had just prayed. He had just stood shoulder to shoulder with other worshippers in Ramadan — the month of mercy, of restraint, of forgiveness. Minutes later, he lay bleeding in the dark. Police have said the investigation is ongoing and that the killing is not currently being treated as religiously motivated. That is an important and responsible clarification. Motive must be established by evidence, not emotion. And yet. Across Muslim communities in Britain and Europe, the question whispers through homes and WhatsApp groups alike: Are we safe? Even at the mosque? The Atmosphere We Cannot Ignore Even when a specific case is not officially labeled a hate crime, it unfolds within a larger social climate. And that climate matters. Across Europe, reports of anti-Muslim hate crimes have surged in recent years. Mosques vandalized....

When a Journalist Becomes a “Hybrid Threat”

The Administrative Erasure of Hüseyin Doğru Europe prides itself on being the global capital of press freedom. And yet, in 2025, the Council of the European Union placed a German journalist under sanctions using a legal regime originally designed to counter Russian destabilisation. The journalist: The legal instrument used against him: Council Regulation (EU) 2024/2642 Concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s destabilising activities CELEX: 32024R2642 Council Decision (CFSP) 2024/2643 Restrictive measures framework (Common Foreign and Security Policy) CELEX: 32024D2643 Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/2021 (3 October 2025 – listing amendment including Doğru) CELEX: 32025R2021 These are not criminal statutes. They are foreign-policy instruments. And under them, a journalist inside the European Union was designated as supporting destabilising activities. What the Official Listing Says According to the Official Journal entry (Annex t...

Ainnbeen

Search This Blog