In a jaw-dropping affidavit filed with Israel’s Supreme Court, Ronen Bar, head of the Shin Bet—Israel’s domestic security agency—accused Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of pressuring him to spy on anti-government protesters and demanding personal loyalty over adherence to the law. The sworn statement has sent shockwaves through Israeli politics, offering a rare and scathing view from inside the nation’s top security institution.
Bar's affidavit, submitted in response to Netanyahu’s recent attempt to fire him, paints a troubling picture: not only did the prime minister seek illegal surveillance on dissenting citizens, but he also expected Bar to side with him over Supreme Court rulings in case of a constitutional crisis. The Shin Bet chief stated that he was compelled to speak out due to fears for the agency’s future independence and professionalism.
Ronen Bar
The tensions reportedly intensified after Bar opened investigations into Netanyahu aides suspected of leaking classified military documents and potential foreign influence in Israeli media—a case nicknamed “Qatargate.” Bar claims these investigations, not a lack of professional trust, triggered Netanyahu’s desire to dismiss him.
In a dramatic twist, Bar also alleged that Netanyahu attempted to involve him in undermining his own ongoing corruption trial, pressuring him to sign a fabricated security opinion to halt proceedings. Bar refused.
The Prime Minister’s office responded quickly, calling the affidavit false and promising to disprove its claims. However, the damage may already be done. Opposition leaders, including Yair Lapid and Yair Golan, have called the affidavit a wake-up call, warning that Netanyahu poses a direct threat to Israel’s democracy and national security.
The court received a classified 31-page version of the affidavit, including appendices that likely contain explosive detail. Meanwhile, Bar announced he would soon step down, reiterating earlier promises made following his agency’s failure to prevent the October 7 Hamas attack.
While Bar acknowledged the Shin Bet’s shortcomings in Gaza and Lebanon, he stressed that it was only after his investigations and refusal to politicize the agency that Netanyahu turned against him. The scandal reveals more than a political rivalry—it exposes deep cracks in the balance of power and the rule of law in Israel.
As Israel grapples with war abroad and unrest at home, the revelations from its top security chief raise a disturbing question: Who is guarding the guardians?
Comments