Netanyahu, Qatar, and Corruption Charges. Israel on Edge: The Aftermath of a Guilty Verdict for Netanyahu.

Allegations of Qatari Financial Ties to Netanyahu: Key Points

1. Alleged Qatari Funds to Netanyahu

Recent reports claim that Qatari officials financially engaged with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
MEMRI (Middle East Media Research Institute) released documents suggesting Qatar's then-Prime Minister, Sheikh Hamad bin Jassim Al Thani, approved a $50 million grant to Netanyahu in 2012.
A letter from Qatar’s Minister of Economy and Finance, Yousef Husain Kamal, allegedly states that the amount was delivered in cash to Netanyahu through Qatar’s State Security Service.
An earlier attempt to transfer the money through the World Vision organization was reportedly unsuccessful.

2. Possible Motivations Behind Qatar’s Alleged Payments

The exact reasons for Qatar’s alleged financial support to Netanyahu remain unclear and speculative.
Qatar was, during this period, actively working to increase its regional influence and may have seen financial ties as a way to secure political leverage.
Qatar has been involved in mediating between Israel and Hamas, often channeling financial aid to Gaza with Israeli approval.
The official justification for Qatari financial aid to Gaza was to stabilize the humanitarian situation, but critics argue that these funds indirectly strengthened Hamas by sustaining its governance.

3. Uncertainty and Denials

The existence of the alleged Qatari documents does not confirm that Netanyahu received the funds.
The authenticity of these claims can only be determined through a thorough criminal investigation.
Netanyahu’s Likud party denied the accusations, calling them "false and illusory", and dismissed the reports as propaganda against Israel.

4. Criminal Investigation by Israeli Authorities

Israel’s Attorney General, Gali Baharav-Miara, has ordered a criminal investigation into the suspected ties between Netanyahu’s office and Qatar.
The Shin Bet (Israel’s internal security service) and the Israeli Police will lead the probe.
The investigation seeks to uncover the facts, legitimacy, and potential national security risks linked to these financial interactions.

5. Ongoing Inquiry and Awaited Findings

The investigation is still in its early stages, and no definitive conclusions have been reached regarding Qatar’s alleged payment or any benefits it secured.
More evidence and official findings are required before determining the truth behind the allegations.

Expected Consequences if Netanyahu is Found Guilty

If Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is found guilty of receiving illegal funds from Qatar, the consequences could be severe, both politically and legally. Here’s what could happen:

1. Legal Consequences

Criminal Charges: Netanyahu could face bribery, fraud, and breach of trust charges, similar to the ones he has faced in past corruption cases.
Trial and Possible Conviction: If the evidence is strong, a criminal trial could follow, potentially leading to fines, imprisonment, or disqualification from politics.
Resignation or Removal: If convicted, Netanyahu may be forced to resign or face legal pressure to step down. Israeli law does not require a prime minister to resign while under indictment, but a conviction could change that.

2. Political Fallout

Collapse of Netanyahu’s Government: His coalition partners, especially those who have already expressed discomfort with his legal troubles, may withdraw support, triggering new elections.
face legal pressure to step down Netanyahu’s main rivals, such as Benny Gantz, Yair Lapid, or Naftali Bennett, could use the scandal to push for a change in leadership.
Impact on Israel-Qatar Relations: If proven true, the scandal could strain Israel’s diplomatic ties with Qatar and raise suspicions about past agreements.

Israeli Public Reaction

1. Divided Public Opinion

Netanyahu’s Supporters: His base, particularly right-wing and religious voters, might see the accusations as a political conspiracy by the judiciary and media.
Opposition and Anti-Corruption Movements: Many Israelis, especially those frustrated with Netanyahu’s long rule, would see this as proof of corruption and demand his resignation.

2. Protests and Civil Unrest

Large-scale protests could erupt, both in support of and against Netanyahu.
Opposition groups may call for new elections or immediate removal, while Netanyahu’s supporters could accuse the justice system of bias.

3. Impact on Israeli Politics

Coalition Instability: If key ministers or parties withdraw their support, Israel could face yet another political crisis and possible elections.
Judiciary vs. Government Tensions: If Netanyahu refuses to step down, a constitutional crisis may arise between Israel’s courts and its government.

Conclusion

If Netanyahu is found guilty, it could mark one of Israel’s biggest political scandals, potentially ending his long political career. The fallout could destabilize the government, polarize the public, and lead to major protests. However, given Netanyahu’s strong political base, his supporters might continue to defend him, leading to a prolonged legal and political battle.

Comments

Famine by design, Silence by Choice: 90,000 children are dying and still the UN can't find it's Spine.

✍️ By Malik Mukhtar | July 22, 2025 📍 From the graveyard of global morality: Gaza Let’s be clear. If a three-month-old baby named Yehia dies of starvation in his mother’s arms at Nasser Hospital, that should be enough for the world to say: “Enough.” But in today’s U.N., apparently 90,000 malnourished children, daily starvation deaths, and food rotting at the Gaza border still don’t meet the “technical ” threshold for famine . Welcome to the age of data-driven genocide , where unless a corpse is tagged with the right IPC Level 5 barcode , it's not really dead enough to matter. 📉 No Data? No Problem. Just Ignore the Bones. Let’s break this down. The Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) — a bureaucratic tool forged in the fires of humanitarian intention — tells us that famine exists when: 20% of households face extreme food shortage, Acute malnutrition in children exceeds 30%, Deaths exceed 2 per 10,000 per day. But wait — Gaza’s under siege, aid...

🏗️ Corporate Complicity in Genocide: The Global Economy Behind Gaza’s Ruin.

📅 July 5, 2025 “We are witnessing not just genocide in Gaza—but a genocide made profitable.” — UN Special Rapporteur, A/HRC/59/23 “This report is written from the heart of darkness . It is penned with a broken hand from a broken land for a broken people . But its words are not broken . They are the words of law and of longing . They are the words of those who are not yet silenced . It is written for Palestinians , first and foremost. It is also addressed to those who remain silent , indifferent or complicit . And it is a call to action for those who are not.” — Introduction, UN Report A/HRC/59/23 In an unprecedented and unflinching report to the UN Human Rights Council, the Special Rapporteur on the Occupied Palestinian Territory has laid bare the truth that much of the world’s corporate, academic, and financial architecture is actively complicit in Israel’s occupation, apartheid, and now, genocide in Gaza. This isn’t just about military aggression . This is about the mac...

"Globalize the Intifada”—Or How to Offend Power by Naming Its Crimes

📰 The New York Times and the Art of Grieving Selectively ✍️ By Malik Mukhtar 📍 ainnbeen.blogspot.com 📅 July 2, 2025 Bret Stephens is upset. Again. Apparently, he’s still recovering from Café Moment. And Passover in Netanya. And that one horrific morning in 2004 when he saw carnage on Azza Street. And he has every right to grieve those losses. Every human does. But here’s the thing: Some corpses get columns. Others get erased. Stephens, perched on the prestigious opinion page of The New York Times , just spent a full-length sermon condemning Zohran Mamdani—not for what he said, but for what he refused to denounce: the phrase “ globalize the intifada.” According to Bret, refusing to ritually cleanse your political career with the holy water of pro-Israel respectability is now akin to blessing bus bombings. What “ globalize the intifada” really means, Mr. Stephens, is refusing to accept a world where genocide is livestreamed, and the world just shrugs. It means dari...

“Starving to Death, But Very Politely” — Gaza’s Famine and the Theater of Moral Collapse

📍Blog: ainnbeen.blogspot.com ✍️ By Malik Mukhtar | July 25, 2025 Let us all pause and thank the New York Times . After 21 months of bombing , blockade, and bullets , we finally have permission — no, confirmation — from America’s journal of record that yes, Gazans are, in fact, dying of starvation. The paper even sent reporters to Haifa, Jerusalem, and London — not Gaza, of course — to deliver the news. Skeletal toddlers, lactating mothers without milk, IV drips rationed like treasure — all neatly documented, sanitized, and wrapped in diplomatic passive voice. But fear not. The famine is not the fault of any one side. It's simply the result of “human failings , ” the report says. Ah yes, the tragedy of equal blame . A little siege here, a little looting there — and voilà! Starvation appears like a natural disaster . Like a famine tsunami . No perpetrators. Just poor little victims. Meanwhile, Israel, the world’s most moral occupier™ , is gallantly uploading videos of...

🩸 "If It Were Really Genocide, Wouldn’t More People Be Dead?" — The Cruel Logic of Bret Stephens

✍️ By Malik Mukhtar | July 23, 2025 So let’s all take a moment to appreciate the cold brilliance of Bret Stephens , New York Times columnist and self-appointed moral compass for the apocalypse. In his latest masterstroke of ethical reasoning , he argues that the claim of genocide in Gaza rings hollow — not because tens of thousands haven’t been killed , but because not enough have. “It may seem harsh to say, but there is a glaring dissonance to the charge that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza.” “If the Israeli government’s intentions and actions are truly genocidal — if it is so malevolent that it is committed to the annihilation of Gazans — why hasn’t it been more methodical and vastly more deadly?” Ah yes, the ol’ “ not genocidal enough” defense — a timeless classic. You see, according to Stephens, genocide must be more “ methodical ,” more “ deadly .” A mere 60,000 deaths (as reported by Gaza’s health ministry) over two years of war doesn’t meet the qu...

Ainnbeen

Search This Blog