Skip to main content

Missiles, Drones and Strategy: The Houthi Playbook against Superpowers. The Unexpected Force Shaping Global Conflicts.

 


The Houthi movement (Ansar Allah) in Yemen has indeed surprised many with its military capabilities, particularly in naval warfare, drone operations, and missile strikes. Their rise as a formidable of force against the U.S., Israel, and their allies can be attributed to several key factors:

1. Iranian Support & Asymmetrical Warfare

The Houthis have received extensive support from Iran, including advanced drone technology, ballistic and cruise missiles, and naval warfare tactics. Iran's strategy of "asymmetrical warfare" has allowed the Houthis to punch above their weight by leveraging low-cost but effective weaponry against technologically superior adversaries.

2. Geographic Advantage & Control Over Red Sea Traffic

The Houthis control key coastal areas along the Red Sea and Bab el-Mandeb Strait, one of the world's most critical maritime chokepoints. This strategic location gives them the ability to disrupt global trade, particularly affecting the Suez Canal route.

3. U.S. and Israel’s Underestimation

Both the U.S. and Israel initially underestimated the Houthis' military capabilities. Western analysts saw the Houthis primarily as a local Yemeni faction rather than a regional actor capable of striking international targets. Their ability to attack deep inside Israel, intercept U.S. warships, and down advanced drones caught the world by surprise.

4. Decentralized, Resilient Warfare Strategy

The Houthis have adopted a guerrilla warfare approach, making them difficult to eliminate. Unlike conventional armies, they operate in a decentralized manner, making targeted strikes less effective in crippling their operations.

5. U.S. and Allied Defensive Challenges

Despite superior military technology, U.S. and allied forces face challenges in fully neutralizing the Houthis:

  • Overwhelming Drone and Missile Attacks: The Houthis launch a high volume of drones and missiles, making it difficult to intercept every attack.
  • Logistical Strain: Continuous missile defense operations put strain on Israel’s Iron Dome and U.S. naval defenses.
  • Rules of Engagement: The U.S. and allies may be limited in their responses due to diplomatic and legal considerations, avoiding escalation into a full-scale regional war.

6. Yemen’s War Experience & Battle-Hardened Fighters

The Houthis have been fighting a prolonged war against a Saudi-led coalition for years. This has given them battlefield experience, resilience, and technical expertise in adapting their tactics against modern warfare strategies.

7. U.S. and Israel’s Focus on Other Fronts

With Israel deeply engaged in Gaza and the U.S. dealing with global commitments (Ukraine, Taiwan, etc.), resources are spread thin. This has allowed the Houthis to capitalize on the situation without facing a decisive counterattack.

Conclusion: Why Haven’t the U.S. and Allies Stopped Yemen?

  • The Houthis' use of asymmetric warfare, Iran's backing, and strategic geography make them a unique challenge.
  • Naval defenses and missile interception are costly and imperfect—a few successful strikes can still create global shockwaves.
  • The fear of escalation into a full-scale war prevents the U.S. from launching a ground invasion or sustained air campaign.

Unless a major shift in strategy occurs, the Houthis will likely continue to be a disruptive force in the region, leveraging their military capabilities to challenge U.S. and Israeli interests.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Famine by design, Silence by Choice: 90,000 children are dying and still the UN can't find it's Spine.

  ✍️ By Malik Mukhtar | July 22, 2025 📍 From the graveyard of global morality: Gaza Let’s be clear. If a three-month-old baby named Yehia dies of starvation in his mother’s arms at Nasser Hospital, that should be enough for the world to say: “Enough.” But in today’s U.N., apparently 90,000 malnourished children, daily starvation deaths, and food rotting at the Gaza border still don’t meet the “technical ” threshold for famine . Welcome to the age of data-driven genocide , where unless a corpse is tagged with the right IPC Level 5 barcode , it's not really dead enough to matter. 📉 No Data? No Problem. Just Ignore the Bones. Let’s break this down. The Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) — a bureaucratic tool forged in the fires of humanitarian intention — tells us that famine exists when: 20% of households face extreme food shortage, Acute malnutrition in children exceeds 30%, Deaths exceed 2 per 10,000 per day. But wait — Gaza’s under siege, aid...

🏗️ Corporate Complicity in Genocide: The Global Economy Behind Gaza’s Ruin.

📅 July 5, 2025 “We are witnessing not just genocide in Gaza—but a genocide made profitable.” — UN Special Rapporteur, A/HRC/59/23 “This report is written from the heart of darkness . It is penned with a broken hand from a broken land for a broken people . But its words are not broken . They are the words of law and of longing . They are the words of those who are not yet silenced . It is written for Palestinians , first and foremost. It is also addressed to those who remain silent , indifferent or complicit . And it is a call to action for those who are not.” — Introduction, UN Report A/HRC/59/23 In an unprecedented and unflinching report to the UN Human Rights Council, the Special Rapporteur on the Occupied Palestinian Territory has laid bare the truth that much of the world’s corporate, academic, and financial architecture is actively complicit in Israel’s occupation, apartheid, and now, genocide in Gaza. This isn’t just about military aggression . This is about the mac...

"Globalize the Intifada”—Or How to Offend Power by Naming Its Crimes

  📰 The New York Times and the Art of Grieving Selectively ✍️ By Malik Mukhtar 📍 ainnbeen.blogspot.com 📅 July 2, 2025 Bret Stephens is upset. Again. Apparently, he’s still recovering from Café Moment. And Passover in Netanya. And that one horrific morning in 2004 when he saw carnage on Azza Street. And he has every right to grieve those losses. Every human does. But here’s the thing: Some corpses get columns. Others get erased. Stephens, perched on the prestigious opinion page of The New York Times , just spent a full-length sermon condemning Zohran Mamdani—not for what he said, but for what he refused to denounce: the phrase “ globalize the intifada.” According to Bret, refusing to ritually cleanse your political career with the holy water of pro-Israel respectability is now akin to blessing bus bombings. What “ globalize the intifada” really means, Mr. Stephens, is refusing to accept a world where genocide is livestreamed, and the world just shrugs. It means dari...

“Starving to Death, But Very Politely” — Gaza’s Famine and the Theater of Moral Collapse

📍Blog: ainnbeen.blogspot.com ✍️ By Malik Mukhtar | July 25, 2025 Let us all pause and thank the New York Times . After 21 months of bombing , blockade, and bullets , we finally have permission — no, confirmation — from America’s journal of record that yes, Gazans are, in fact, dying of starvation. The paper even sent reporters to Haifa, Jerusalem, and London — not Gaza, of course — to deliver the news. Skeletal toddlers, lactating mothers without milk, IV drips rationed like treasure — all neatly documented, sanitized, and wrapped in diplomatic passive voice. But fear not. The famine is not the fault of any one side. It's simply the result of “human failings , ” the report says. Ah yes, the tragedy of equal blame . A little siege here, a little looting there — and voilà! Starvation appears like a natural disaster . Like a famine tsunami . No perpetrators. Just poor little victims. Meanwhile, Israel, the world’s most moral occupier™ , is gallantly uploading videos of...

🩸 "If It Were Really Genocide, Wouldn’t More People Be Dead?" — The Cruel Logic of Bret Stephens

  ✍️ By Malik Mukhtar | July 23, 2025 So let’s all take a moment to appreciate the cold brilliance of Bret Stephens , New York Times columnist and self-appointed moral compass for the apocalypse. In his latest masterstroke of ethical reasoning , he argues that the claim of genocide in Gaza rings hollow — not because tens of thousands haven’t been killed , but because not enough have. “It may seem harsh to say, but there is a glaring dissonance to the charge that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza.” “If the Israeli government’s intentions and actions are truly genocidal — if it is so malevolent that it is committed to the annihilation of Gazans — why hasn’t it been more methodical and vastly more deadly?” Ah yes, the ol’ “ not genocidal enough” defense — a timeless classic. You see, according to Stephens, genocide must be more “ methodical ,” more “ deadly .” A mere 60,000 deaths (as reported by Gaza’s health ministry) over two years of war doesn’t meet the qu...