Skip to main content

"I’m sitting on the side that’s launching bombs’: author Omar El Akkad on the hypocrisy of the west." Interview of Omer El Akkad by Noa Yachot. TheGuardian.

 


Here’s a detailed breakdown of Omar El Akkad’s views from his Guardian interview, where he critiques the hypocrisy of the West, particularly in the context of the Gaza war, the U.S. role in global conflicts, and the moral failures of Western liberalism.

1. Disillusionment with the "Free World"

  • Early Idealization of the West:
    • As a child growing up in Egypt and Qatar, El Akkad admired Western freedoms—such as access to uncensored books and music.
    • Moving to Canada and later the U.S., he saw the West as a land of opportunity and values.
  • Cracks in the Illusion:
    • Despite covering major conflicts (Afghanistan, Guantánamo, the Arab uprisings), he still believed in America’s moral foundation.
    • The Gaza war shattered this belief, making him feel personally complicit in Western-supported atrocities.

2. The Gaza War as the Breaking Point

  • "Sitting on the launching side of the bombs":
    • El Akkad recognizes that his taxpayer money funds Israel’s war in Gaza, making him complicit.
    • Unlike past conflicts he covered, the real-time nature of the Gaza war made it impossible to look away.
  • Three Reasons for His Crisis of Faith:
    1. Immediacy: The war unfolded live on social media, with images of children who were later confirmed dead.
    2. Scale: The magnitude of destruction was beyond what he had seen before.
    3. Cowardice (His Own): He admits he ignored warning signs and justified past U.S. actions as anomalies, but Gaza made that impossible.

3. Hypocrisy of Western Liberalism

  • Moral Bankruptcy of Western Political Leaders:
    • The war in Gaza revealed that Western liberalism is hollow, prioritizing comfort over true moral action.
    • He criticizes leaders who preach human rights while funding wars and ignoring mass suffering.
  • Democrats’ Performative Politics:
    • The Democratic Party talks about existential threats (Trump, climate change) but does little to meaningfully address them.
    • Biden’s administration postures as progressive while actively supporting war and oppression.
  • Contrast with Trump and the Right:
    • While Trump is extreme, his actions align more closely with his rhetoric.
    • The Democratic Party, however, widens the gap between its "performance" and "reality."

4. The U.S. War on Terror and Its Parallels to Gaza

  • Previous Reporting on U.S. Wars:
    • He covered Afghanistan, Guantánamo, and the post-9/11 era but still believed in America’s "core goodness."
    • Thought U.S. actions were deviations from a fundamentally sound system.
  • Why Gaza is Different:
    • Unlike the "War on Terror," Gaza’s destruction is ongoing and visible in real time.
    • The global response—either silent, complicit, or justifying violence—makes it impossible to believe in Western moral leadership.

5. The Collapse of the American System

  • Trump is Not the Biggest Threat:
    • El Akkad sees the real problem as systemic: America is built on "endless taking"—of land, resources, and lives.
    • Trump is merely a symptom of a deeper issue; his extremism was once fringe but is now mainstream.
  • The System is Breaking Under Its Own Myths:
    • The U.S. political structure can no longer sustain its contradictions.
    • Both major parties are failing: one (Republicans) embraces extremism, while the other (Democrats) offers weak resistance.

6. The Role of Complacent Liberals

  • The Silent Majority’s Responsibility:
    • Many liberals sympathize with Palestinian suffering but refuse to act.
    • Fear of backlash or loss of privilege stops them from speaking out.
  • Western Institutions Are Failing:
    • Academia, media, and political structures have proven to be complicit in oppression.
    • The West claims to champion democracy and human rights but applies those values selectively.

7. Hope in Grassroots Resistance

  • Despite Everything, There is Hope:
    • His book is not just an indictment but a recognition of individual courage.
    • Examples of resistance:
      • Doctors risking their lives to save people in Gaza.
      • Dock workers refusing to load weapons onto ships.
      • University students rejecting privilege to protest injustice.
  • The Future of Change Lies in the People:
    • Institutional reform may be hopeless, but grassroots movements offer real opposition.
    • He sees ordinary people taking meaningful action, which gives him hope.

8. Final Takeaways

  • The Gaza war exposed the deep hypocrisy of Western liberalism and permanently severed El Akkad’s belief in the moral superiority of the West.
  • The U.S. government, particularly under Democratic leadership, engages in performative politics—preaching justice while funding war.
  • The American system is collapsing, not because of Trump alone, but because of its insatiable nature and reliance on violence.
  • While institutions fail, individual acts of resistance prove that people can still fight for justice.
  • The future depends on whether liberals will move beyond passive sympathy and take real action.

Conclusion

El Akkad’s latest work is not just a critique of America’s hypocrisy but a call for moral clarity. He argues that people must either accept their complicity in systemic violence or take a stand—because the West’s moral posturing is no longer sustainable.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Dr. Randa Abdel Fattah. De-Invited by Association: When Grief Becomes a Pretext and Palestinian Identity a Liability

How Dr. Randa Abdel-Fattah Was Silenced in the Name of “Sensitivity” In a remarkable feat of moral gymnastics, Australia’s literary establishment has once again demonstrated how grief can be weaponised, principles suspended, and Palestinian identity rendered dangerously “inappropriate ” —all in the name of cultural sensitivity. Dr. Randa Abdel-Fattah , a respected author, academic, and public intellectual, was quietly de-invited from Adelaide Writers’ Week following the Bondi Junction massacre. Not because she had any connection—real, implied, or imagined—to the atrocity. Not because she endorsed violence. Not because she violated any law or ethical standard. But because, apparently, the mere presence of a Palestinian Muslim woman who speaks about justice is now considered culturally unsafe during national mourning . One wonders: unsafe for whom? The Logic of the Absurd Festival organisers were careful—almost impressively so—to state that Dr. Abdel-Fattah had nothing to do wi...
Post a Comment
Read more

Ana Kasparian: The Voice That Won’t Be Silent — A Call for Truth in an Age of Power

  Ana Kasparian is one of the most recognized and outspoken voices in contemporary political media. As a co-host of The Young Turks — a trailblazing online news and commentary program — she has spent nearly two decades dissecting U.S. politics, media, power, and foreign policy with unapologetic clarity and fierce conviction. She is not just a commentator — she is a truth-seeker who challenges power at every turn , refusing to soften her words for comfort. Schooled in journalism and political science, Ana’s commentary continues to mobilize millions, especially younger generations who feel unheard in mainstream discourse. A Voice Against the Status Quo Ana’s rhetoric can be bold, controversial, and deeply passionate — because she refuses to accept narratives that obscure the underlying truth about power and influence. On American democracy and foreign policy, she strikes at the heart of what many hesitate to articulate: “ We don’t actually live in a true democracy here in t...
Post a Comment
Read more

Gaza and the Collapse of World Order: When the Guardian of Human Rights Sounds the Alarm

There are moments when the language of diplomacy fails, when caution becomes complicity, and when silence becomes an accomplice to destruction. On January 9, 2026, Agnès Callamard—Secretary General of Amnesty International—crossed that threshold. Her words were unambiguous, unprecedented, and devastating: The United States is destroying world order. Israel has been doing so for the last two years. Germany, through complicity and repression, is helping govern its demise. This was not activist rhetoric. It was a diagnosis from the very institution tasked with guarding the moral and legal architecture of the modern world. The Collapse of the Post-War Moral Architecture The international order that emerged after World War II was built on a promise: never again . Never again genocide. Never again collective punishment. Never again impunity for powerful states. That promise was codified in international law, human rights conventions, and multilateral institutions. But Gaza has...
Post a Comment
Read more

Rebranding Genocide: When Killing Learns New Words

  There are moments in history when crimes do not end — they simply learn new language. Gaza is living inside such a moment. The bombs have not stopped falling. The children have not stopped dying. The displaced have not stopped freezing in tents pitched atop rubble that was once their homes. What has changed is the vocabulary . And in the modern age, vocabulary is power . If you can rename atrocity, you can anesthetize conscience. First, it was called self-defense — a phrase emptied of meaning by its repetition. Then it became a war , despite the grotesque imbalance: one side armed with one of the most advanced militaries on earth, backed by the world’s most powerful empire ; the other a besieged civilian population without an army, navy, air force, tanks, or safe shelter. Now it is branded a ceasefire — a word invoked not to stop violence, but to conceal it. This is not peace. It is genocide with a quieter soundtrack. The Illusion of Restraint A slowed rate of killing is not m...
Post a Comment
Read more

Citizens on Paper, Expendable in Practice Arab Israelis, October 7, and the Failure of International Law Inside the “Only Democracy”

  Israel tells the world it is the only democracy in the Middle East . Democracies, we are reminded, protect all citizens equally—especially minorities—especially in times of crisis. Now look at Palestinian citizens of Israel , roughly 20% of the population , in the months following October 7 . Then ask: what exactly does citizenship mean when the state will not protect your life? The Forgotten Fifth of the Population Arab citizens of Israel vote. They hold passports. They pay taxes. They are citizens in the narrow, bureaucratic sense. But international law does not define citizenship by paperwork. It defines it by: Equal protection Non-discrimination The right to life Equal access to justice On those measures, Israel is not merely failing—it is structurally violating its obligations . A Murder Epidemic the State Chooses Not to Stop Long before October 7, Arab towns inside Israel were drowning in violence: Illegal weapons proliferated Organized crime flourished ...
Post a Comment
Read more