Skip to main content

"I’m sitting on the side that’s launching bombs’: author Omar El Akkad on the hypocrisy of the west." Interview of Omer El Akkad by Noa Yachot. TheGuardian.

 


Here’s a detailed breakdown of Omar El Akkad’s views from his Guardian interview, where he critiques the hypocrisy of the West, particularly in the context of the Gaza war, the U.S. role in global conflicts, and the moral failures of Western liberalism.

1. Disillusionment with the "Free World"

  • Early Idealization of the West:
    • As a child growing up in Egypt and Qatar, El Akkad admired Western freedoms—such as access to uncensored books and music.
    • Moving to Canada and later the U.S., he saw the West as a land of opportunity and values.
  • Cracks in the Illusion:
    • Despite covering major conflicts (Afghanistan, Guantánamo, the Arab uprisings), he still believed in America’s moral foundation.
    • The Gaza war shattered this belief, making him feel personally complicit in Western-supported atrocities.

2. The Gaza War as the Breaking Point

  • "Sitting on the launching side of the bombs":
    • El Akkad recognizes that his taxpayer money funds Israel’s war in Gaza, making him complicit.
    • Unlike past conflicts he covered, the real-time nature of the Gaza war made it impossible to look away.
  • Three Reasons for His Crisis of Faith:
    1. Immediacy: The war unfolded live on social media, with images of children who were later confirmed dead.
    2. Scale: The magnitude of destruction was beyond what he had seen before.
    3. Cowardice (His Own): He admits he ignored warning signs and justified past U.S. actions as anomalies, but Gaza made that impossible.

3. Hypocrisy of Western Liberalism

  • Moral Bankruptcy of Western Political Leaders:
    • The war in Gaza revealed that Western liberalism is hollow, prioritizing comfort over true moral action.
    • He criticizes leaders who preach human rights while funding wars and ignoring mass suffering.
  • Democrats’ Performative Politics:
    • The Democratic Party talks about existential threats (Trump, climate change) but does little to meaningfully address them.
    • Biden’s administration postures as progressive while actively supporting war and oppression.
  • Contrast with Trump and the Right:
    • While Trump is extreme, his actions align more closely with his rhetoric.
    • The Democratic Party, however, widens the gap between its "performance" and "reality."

4. The U.S. War on Terror and Its Parallels to Gaza

  • Previous Reporting on U.S. Wars:
    • He covered Afghanistan, Guantánamo, and the post-9/11 era but still believed in America’s "core goodness."
    • Thought U.S. actions were deviations from a fundamentally sound system.
  • Why Gaza is Different:
    • Unlike the "War on Terror," Gaza’s destruction is ongoing and visible in real time.
    • The global response—either silent, complicit, or justifying violence—makes it impossible to believe in Western moral leadership.

5. The Collapse of the American System

  • Trump is Not the Biggest Threat:
    • El Akkad sees the real problem as systemic: America is built on "endless taking"—of land, resources, and lives.
    • Trump is merely a symptom of a deeper issue; his extremism was once fringe but is now mainstream.
  • The System is Breaking Under Its Own Myths:
    • The U.S. political structure can no longer sustain its contradictions.
    • Both major parties are failing: one (Republicans) embraces extremism, while the other (Democrats) offers weak resistance.

6. The Role of Complacent Liberals

  • The Silent Majority’s Responsibility:
    • Many liberals sympathize with Palestinian suffering but refuse to act.
    • Fear of backlash or loss of privilege stops them from speaking out.
  • Western Institutions Are Failing:
    • Academia, media, and political structures have proven to be complicit in oppression.
    • The West claims to champion democracy and human rights but applies those values selectively.

7. Hope in Grassroots Resistance

  • Despite Everything, There is Hope:
    • His book is not just an indictment but a recognition of individual courage.
    • Examples of resistance:
      • Doctors risking their lives to save people in Gaza.
      • Dock workers refusing to load weapons onto ships.
      • University students rejecting privilege to protest injustice.
  • The Future of Change Lies in the People:
    • Institutional reform may be hopeless, but grassroots movements offer real opposition.
    • He sees ordinary people taking meaningful action, which gives him hope.

8. Final Takeaways

  • The Gaza war exposed the deep hypocrisy of Western liberalism and permanently severed El Akkad’s belief in the moral superiority of the West.
  • The U.S. government, particularly under Democratic leadership, engages in performative politics—preaching justice while funding war.
  • The American system is collapsing, not because of Trump alone, but because of its insatiable nature and reliance on violence.
  • While institutions fail, individual acts of resistance prove that people can still fight for justice.
  • The future depends on whether liberals will move beyond passive sympathy and take real action.

Conclusion

El Akkad’s latest work is not just a critique of America’s hypocrisy but a call for moral clarity. He argues that people must either accept their complicity in systemic violence or take a stand—because the West’s moral posturing is no longer sustainable.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Rabbi Against the State: When Faith Refuses Power

In a world where identity is weaponized and religion is drafted into political armies, the sight of an ultra-Orthodox rabbi standing beside Palestinian flags unsettles nearly everyone. Yet there stands — black coat, beard, sidelocks — calmly declaring something that scrambles modern assumptions: “ Judaism is not Zionism.” For him, this is not rebellion . It is obedience . Affiliated with , a small and highly controversial Haredi sect, Rabbi Beck represents a theological current that predates modern nationalism. His argument is not secular. It is not progressive. It is not post-modern. It is ancient . And that is precisely the point. The Interview That Disturbs Categories In one widely circulated long-form interview, the exchange unfolds with almost disarming simplicity. Interviewer: Rabbi Beck, how can you oppose Israel as a Jewish rabbi? Rabbi Beck: Judaism and Zionism are two completely different things. Judaism is a religion. Zionism is a political movement founded little more ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The High Priest of “Serious” Wars Discovers Bibi

  There was a time when rode into every Middle Eastern catastrophe like a TED Talk with a press pass. If there was a war to explain, a regime to modernize, or a “vital message” to send with cruise missiles, Tom was there — sleeves rolled up, metaphors polished. Back when the invasion of was sold as a democratic software update, Friedman wasn’t exactly storming the barricades. He was midwifing “creative destruction.” The region would be shocked into sanity. History would bend toward market reform. Fast forward. Now he’s discovered that might be bending something else entirely. When an Ex–Prime Minister Uses the Words “Ethnic Cleansing” What jolts Friedman’s latest column is not campus rhetoric. Not activist slogans. Not fringe NGOs. It’s — a former Israeli prime minister — using language that once would have detonated diplomatic careers. Olmert wrote in Haaretz that: “A violent and criminal effort is underway to ethnically cleanse territories in the West Bank.” Let...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sanctions, Selective Morality, and the War That Never Ends

  On Feb. 28, 2026, The Editorial Board of NYTimes  warned that President Trump’s latest strike on Iran was reckless, unconstitutional, and strategically undefined. The board expressed concern for “the many innocent Iranians who have long suffered.” Eleven days earlier, on Feb. 17, 2026, wrote something even more explosive: “ Israel’s far-right government, led by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, is spitting in America’s face and telling us it’s raining. It’s not raining. Bibi is playing both President Trump and American Jews for fools.” Friedman was not questioning Israel’s right to defend itself. He was questioning whether American power was being drawn into a strategy shaped less by U.S. national interest and more by Israel’s domestic political calculus. That distinction matters. Iran as the Permanent External Threat For over four decades, Iran has been under American sanctions. Since 1979, layers of financial, oil, trade, and banking restrictions have been impo...
Post a Comment
Read more

Blood in the Car Park: Islamophobia and the Fear That Follows Us to Prayer

  On a cold February evening in 2026, 18-year-old Zeeshan Afzal was stabbed to death in the parking lot of Oldbury Jamia Masjid, near Birmingham. He had just prayed. He had just stood shoulder to shoulder with other worshippers in Ramadan — the month of mercy, of restraint, of forgiveness. Minutes later, he lay bleeding in the dark. Police have said the investigation is ongoing and that the killing is not currently being treated as religiously motivated. That is an important and responsible clarification. Motive must be established by evidence, not emotion. And yet. Across Muslim communities in Britain and Europe, the question whispers through homes and WhatsApp groups alike: Are we safe? Even at the mosque? The Atmosphere We Cannot Ignore Even when a specific case is not officially labeled a hate crime, it unfolds within a larger social climate. And that climate matters. Across Europe, reports of anti-Muslim hate crimes have surged in recent years. Mosques vandalized....
Post a Comment
Read more

When a Journalist Becomes a “Hybrid Threat”

  The Administrative Erasure of Hüseyin Doğru Europe prides itself on being the global capital of press freedom. And yet, in 2025, the Council of the European Union placed a German journalist under sanctions using a legal regime originally designed to counter Russian destabilisation. The journalist: The legal instrument used against him: Council Regulation (EU) 2024/2642 Concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s destabilising activities CELEX: 32024R2642 Council Decision (CFSP) 2024/2643 Restrictive measures framework (Common Foreign and Security Policy) CELEX: 32024D2643 Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/2021 (3 October 2025 – listing amendment including Doğru) CELEX: 32025R2021 These are not criminal statutes. They are foreign-policy instruments. And under them, a journalist inside the European Union was designated as supporting destabilising activities. What the Official Listing Says According to the Official Journal entry (Annex t...
Post a Comment
Read more