"'Enemy Inside the Wire': Steve Bannon's Toxic Take on Jews, Israel and the Far Right," Allison Kaplan Sommer. Haaretz.

Allison Kaplan Sommer

Brief introduction of Allison Kaplan Sommer

Allison Kaplan Sommer is an American-born journalist who has been with Haaretz since 2012. She hosts the Haaretz Weekend podcast and co-hosts The Promised Podcast. Before joining Haaretz, she served as the Washington, D.C., bureau chief for The Jerusalem Post and has contributed to publications such as The New Republic and Politico. Her work has been recognized with awards, including the 2016 B’nai B’rith World Center Award for Journalism for Excellence in Diaspora Reportage and the 2017 Simon Rockower Award for excellence in covering Zionism, Aliyah, and Israel. In her reporting, Sommer often explores the intersection of U.S. and Israeli politics, as well as issues affecting the Jewish diaspora. Her recent article, "'Enemy Inside the Wire': Steve Bannon's Toxic Take on Jews, Israel and the Far Right," reflects her commitment to analyzing complex and sensitive topics within the Jewish community and broader political landscape.

Allison Kaplan Sommer's article in Haaretz, titled "'Enemy Inside the Wire': Steve Bannon's Toxic Take on Jews, Israel and the Far Right," delves into Steve Bannon's recent statements and actions that have sparked significant controversy. Bannon, a prominent figure in far-right politics and former advisor to President Donald Trump, has made remarks suggesting that the primary adversaries of Israel are not external threats but rather American Jews who do not support Israel or the MAGA (Make America Great Again) movement. He stated, "The biggest enemy you have is inside the wire: progressive Jewish billionaires that are funding all this stuff."

Key Points:

Internal Division Among Jews: Bannon's rhetoric implies a division within the Jewish community, positioning progressive American Jews as adversaries to Israel. This narrative fosters internal discord and portrays a segment of Jews as threats to their own community.
Alignment with Far-Right Nationalism: Bannon attempts to align unwavering support for Israel with far-right nationalist ideologies. By doing so, he seeks to create a coalition between pro-Israel stances and extreme right-wing movements, potentially alienating Jews who hold diverse political views.
Antisemitic Undertones: His comments echo longstanding antisemitic tropes that question the loyalty of Jews, suggesting that those who do not align with specific political ideologies are enemies from within. This rhetoric can perpetuate harmful stereotypes and increase antisemitic sentiments.
Controversial Gestures: At the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC), Bannon made a gesture resembling a Nazi salute, which he later dismissed as a harmless wave. This action drew criticism from various quarters, including far-right figures like French politician Jordan Bardella, who canceled his CPAC appearance in protest.

Further Explanation:

Bannon's strategy appears to be an effort to redefine the narrative around support for Israel, tying it closely to far-right nationalism. This approach not only seeks to marginalize progressive Jews but also attempts to reshape the political alliances surrounding Israel, potentially driving a wedge between different factions within the Jewish diaspora and between diaspora Jews and Israel.

By casting progressive Jewish individuals and organizations as internal enemies, Bannon taps into divisive tactics that can fracture communal solidarity. This internal strife serves to weaken collective action and can isolate those who advocate for a more nuanced or critical approach to Israeli policies.

Moreover, the incorporation of gestures and symbols associated with historical antisemitism, whether intentional or not, signals a troubling normalization of extremist imagery in mainstream political discourse. Such actions not only offend but also embolden fringe elements that interpret these gestures as validation of their hateful ideologies.

In summary, Bannon's recent conduct exemplifies a deliberate intertwining of pro-Israel rhetoric with far-right nationalism, employing divisive language and controversial actions that risk deepening rifts within the Jewish community and between Jews and broader political movements.

Comments

When the Warning Comes from the General Moshe Ya’alon, Jewish Supremacy, and the Echo Nobody Wanted to Hear

History has a cruel sense of irony. Sometimes the most devastating indictments do not come from the oppressed, the bombed, the buried, or the silenced—but from the very architects of power who once swore they were different. This week, that indictment came from Moshe Ya’alon : former Israeli Defense Minister, former IDF Chief of Staff, lifelong pillar of Israel’s security establishment. Not a dissident poet. Not a radical academic. Not a Palestinian survivor. A general. And what he said shattered the last polite illusion. “ The ideology of Jewish supremacy that has become dominant in the Israeli government is reminiscent of Nazi race theory.” Pause there. Sit with it. This was not shouted at a protest . It was not scribbled on a placard. It was written calmly, deliberately, after attending a Holocaust Remembrance ceremony —then reading reports of Jewish settlers attacking Palestinians , blocking ambulances , fracturing skulls , burning homes. Never Again, apparently, now ...

A Rabbi Against the State: When Faith Refuses Power

In a world where identity is weaponized and religion is drafted into political armies, the sight of an ultra-Orthodox rabbi standing beside Palestinian flags unsettles nearly everyone. Yet there stands — black coat, beard, sidelocks — calmly declaring something that scrambles modern assumptions: “ Judaism is not Zionism.” For him, this is not rebellion . It is obedience . Affiliated with , a small and highly controversial Haredi sect, Rabbi Beck represents a theological current that predates modern nationalism. His argument is not secular. It is not progressive. It is not post-modern. It is ancient . And that is precisely the point. The Interview That Disturbs Categories In one widely circulated long-form interview, the exchange unfolds with almost disarming simplicity. Interviewer: Rabbi Beck, how can you oppose Israel as a Jewish rabbi? Rabbi Beck: Judaism and Zionism are two completely different things. Judaism is a religion. Zionism is a political movement founded little more ...

“Not Auschwitz — Yet Still Genocide”: When Israeli Holocaust Historians Break the Silence on Gaza

There are moments in history when the most unsettling truths do not come from one’s enemies, but from within. From those who know the past most intimately. From those whose moral authority is built not on ideology, but on memory. In December 2025, two of Israel’s most respected Holocaust and genocide scholars— Prof. Daniel Blatman and Prof. Amos Goldberg of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem—published a deeply unsettling opinion article in Haaretz . What they argued was not casual, rhetorical, or activist hyperbole. It was a grave historical judgment. Their conclusion was stark: What is happening in Gaza is not Auschwitz. But it belongs to the same family of crimes: genocide. Why This Voice Matters Blatman and Goldberg are not marginal figures. They are historians whose professional lives have been devoted to studying Nazi crimes, genocide mechanisms, memory, and moral responsibility . Their scholarship is rooted in the very catastrophe that shaped modern Jewish iden...

Even the Dead Are Not Safe: How Power Desecrates Graves and Calls It Security

There is a final dignity that every civilization, every faith, every moral tradition claims to respect: the dignity of the dead. In Gaza and the West Bank, even that has been revoked. Homes can be flattened. Children can be starved. Hospitals can be reduced to ash. These crimes, we are told, are “tragic necessities.” But graves ? What threat does a corpse pose to a modern army armed with drones , tanks , and nuclear ambiguity ? Apparently, enough to be bulldozed. Graves as Enemy Infrastructure According to detailed reporting by Al Jazeera , Israeli forces in Gaza did not merely fight the living — they waged war on cemeteries . Tombstones were crushed. Graves were excavated . Human remains were scattered, mixed, lost . Families returned not to mourning, but to forensic horror: bones without names, names without bodies. This was not collateral damage . This was not crossfire. This was methodical excavation . Heavy machinery was deployed to retrieve the body of one ...

Don’t Spoil the Show: Gaza, Davos, and the Business Class of Peace

There is a rule at Davos—unwritten, but strictly enforced. Reality is bad for business. Yossi Alpher learned this the hard way. Sitting on a panel at a luxury resort near the Dead Sea, surrounded by ministers, executives, and conflict “experts,” he made the unforgivable mistake of speaking honestly. Grim facts. Grim assessments. No PowerPoint optimism. No Riviera renderings. No applause. A prominent Israeli industrialist later pulled him aside and explained the crime: “ Don’t spoil the show . The idea is to radiate optimism that nourishes an investment climate . It’s all about business. No room for realism .” That sentence may be the most accurate peace-process doctrine of the 21st century. Phase II: Now With Billionaires Fast forward to Davos again. This time, the stage is Gaza—or rather, Gaza™ , the investment opportunity. Trump’s “Board of Peace,” staffed by billionaires and brand managers of global destruction , announces Phase II of a Gaza peace plan with all the s...

Ainnbeen

Search This Blog