"'Enemy Inside the Wire': Steve Bannon's Toxic Take on Jews, Israel and the Far Right," Allison Kaplan Sommer. Haaretz.

Allison Kaplan Sommer

Brief introduction of Allison Kaplan Sommer

Allison Kaplan Sommer is an American-born journalist who has been with Haaretz since 2012. She hosts the Haaretz Weekend podcast and co-hosts The Promised Podcast. Before joining Haaretz, she served as the Washington, D.C., bureau chief for The Jerusalem Post and has contributed to publications such as The New Republic and Politico. Her work has been recognized with awards, including the 2016 B’nai B’rith World Center Award for Journalism for Excellence in Diaspora Reportage and the 2017 Simon Rockower Award for excellence in covering Zionism, Aliyah, and Israel. In her reporting, Sommer often explores the intersection of U.S. and Israeli politics, as well as issues affecting the Jewish diaspora. Her recent article, "'Enemy Inside the Wire': Steve Bannon's Toxic Take on Jews, Israel and the Far Right," reflects her commitment to analyzing complex and sensitive topics within the Jewish community and broader political landscape.

Allison Kaplan Sommer's article in Haaretz, titled "'Enemy Inside the Wire': Steve Bannon's Toxic Take on Jews, Israel and the Far Right," delves into Steve Bannon's recent statements and actions that have sparked significant controversy. Bannon, a prominent figure in far-right politics and former advisor to President Donald Trump, has made remarks suggesting that the primary adversaries of Israel are not external threats but rather American Jews who do not support Israel or the MAGA (Make America Great Again) movement. He stated, "The biggest enemy you have is inside the wire: progressive Jewish billionaires that are funding all this stuff."

Key Points:

Internal Division Among Jews: Bannon's rhetoric implies a division within the Jewish community, positioning progressive American Jews as adversaries to Israel. This narrative fosters internal discord and portrays a segment of Jews as threats to their own community.
Alignment with Far-Right Nationalism: Bannon attempts to align unwavering support for Israel with far-right nationalist ideologies. By doing so, he seeks to create a coalition between pro-Israel stances and extreme right-wing movements, potentially alienating Jews who hold diverse political views.
Antisemitic Undertones: His comments echo longstanding antisemitic tropes that question the loyalty of Jews, suggesting that those who do not align with specific political ideologies are enemies from within. This rhetoric can perpetuate harmful stereotypes and increase antisemitic sentiments.
Controversial Gestures: At the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC), Bannon made a gesture resembling a Nazi salute, which he later dismissed as a harmless wave. This action drew criticism from various quarters, including far-right figures like French politician Jordan Bardella, who canceled his CPAC appearance in protest.

Further Explanation:

Bannon's strategy appears to be an effort to redefine the narrative around support for Israel, tying it closely to far-right nationalism. This approach not only seeks to marginalize progressive Jews but also attempts to reshape the political alliances surrounding Israel, potentially driving a wedge between different factions within the Jewish diaspora and between diaspora Jews and Israel.

By casting progressive Jewish individuals and organizations as internal enemies, Bannon taps into divisive tactics that can fracture communal solidarity. This internal strife serves to weaken collective action and can isolate those who advocate for a more nuanced or critical approach to Israeli policies.

Moreover, the incorporation of gestures and symbols associated with historical antisemitism, whether intentional or not, signals a troubling normalization of extremist imagery in mainstream political discourse. Such actions not only offend but also embolden fringe elements that interpret these gestures as validation of their hateful ideologies.

In summary, Bannon's recent conduct exemplifies a deliberate intertwining of pro-Israel rhetoric with far-right nationalism, employing divisive language and controversial actions that risk deepening rifts within the Jewish community and between Jews and broader political movements.

Comments

A Rabbi Against the State: When Faith Refuses Power

In a world where identity is weaponized and religion is drafted into political armies, the sight of an ultra-Orthodox rabbi standing beside Palestinian flags unsettles nearly everyone. Yet there stands — black coat, beard, sidelocks — calmly declaring something that scrambles modern assumptions: “ Judaism is not Zionism.” For him, this is not rebellion . It is obedience . Affiliated with , a small and highly controversial Haredi sect, Rabbi Beck represents a theological current that predates modern nationalism. His argument is not secular. It is not progressive. It is not post-modern. It is ancient . And that is precisely the point. The Interview That Disturbs Categories In one widely circulated long-form interview, the exchange unfolds with almost disarming simplicity. Interviewer: Rabbi Beck, how can you oppose Israel as a Jewish rabbi? Rabbi Beck: Judaism and Zionism are two completely different things. Judaism is a religion. Zionism is a political movement founded little more ...

The High Priest of “Serious” Wars Discovers Bibi

There was a time when rode into every Middle Eastern catastrophe like a TED Talk with a press pass. If there was a war to explain, a regime to modernize, or a “vital message” to send with cruise missiles, Tom was there — sleeves rolled up, metaphors polished. Back when the invasion of was sold as a democratic software update, Friedman wasn’t exactly storming the barricades. He was midwifing “creative destruction.” The region would be shocked into sanity. History would bend toward market reform. Fast forward. Now he’s discovered that might be bending something else entirely. When an Ex–Prime Minister Uses the Words “Ethnic Cleansing” What jolts Friedman’s latest column is not campus rhetoric. Not activist slogans. Not fringe NGOs. It’s — a former Israeli prime minister — using language that once would have detonated diplomatic careers. Olmert wrote in Haaretz that: “A violent and criminal effort is underway to ethnically cleanse territories in the West Bank.” Let...

Sanctions, Selective Morality, and the War That Never Ends

On Feb. 28, 2026, The Editorial Board of NYTimes warned that President Trump’s latest strike on Iran was reckless, unconstitutional, and strategically undefined. The board expressed concern for “the many innocent Iranians who have long suffered.” Eleven days earlier, on Feb. 17, 2026, wrote something even more explosive: “ Israel’s far-right government, led by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, is spitting in America’s face and telling us it’s raining. It’s not raining. Bibi is playing both President Trump and American Jews for fools.” Friedman was not questioning Israel’s right to defend itself. He was questioning whether American power was being drawn into a strategy shaped less by U.S. national interest and more by Israel’s domestic political calculus. That distinction matters. Iran as the Permanent External Threat For over four decades, Iran has been under American sanctions. Since 1979, layers of financial, oil, trade, and banking restrictions have been impo...

Blood in the Car Park: Islamophobia and the Fear That Follows Us to Prayer

On a cold February evening in 2026, 18-year-old Zeeshan Afzal was stabbed to death in the parking lot of Oldbury Jamia Masjid, near Birmingham. He had just prayed. He had just stood shoulder to shoulder with other worshippers in Ramadan — the month of mercy, of restraint, of forgiveness. Minutes later, he lay bleeding in the dark. Police have said the investigation is ongoing and that the killing is not currently being treated as religiously motivated. That is an important and responsible clarification. Motive must be established by evidence, not emotion. And yet. Across Muslim communities in Britain and Europe, the question whispers through homes and WhatsApp groups alike: Are we safe? Even at the mosque? The Atmosphere We Cannot Ignore Even when a specific case is not officially labeled a hate crime, it unfolds within a larger social climate. And that climate matters. Across Europe, reports of anti-Muslim hate crimes have surged in recent years. Mosques vandalized....

When a Journalist Becomes a “Hybrid Threat”

The Administrative Erasure of Hüseyin Doğru Europe prides itself on being the global capital of press freedom. And yet, in 2025, the Council of the European Union placed a German journalist under sanctions using a legal regime originally designed to counter Russian destabilisation. The journalist: The legal instrument used against him: Council Regulation (EU) 2024/2642 Concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s destabilising activities CELEX: 32024R2642 Council Decision (CFSP) 2024/2643 Restrictive measures framework (Common Foreign and Security Policy) CELEX: 32024D2643 Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/2021 (3 October 2025 – listing amendment including Doğru) CELEX: 32025R2021 These are not criminal statutes. They are foreign-policy instruments. And under them, a journalist inside the European Union was designated as supporting destabilising activities. What the Official Listing Says According to the Official Journal entry (Annex t...

Ainnbeen

Search This Blog