"'Enemy Inside the Wire': Steve Bannon's Toxic Take on Jews, Israel and the Far Right," Allison Kaplan Sommer. Haaretz.

Allison Kaplan Sommer

Brief introduction of Allison Kaplan Sommer

Allison Kaplan Sommer is an American-born journalist who has been with Haaretz since 2012. She hosts the Haaretz Weekend podcast and co-hosts The Promised Podcast. Before joining Haaretz, she served as the Washington, D.C., bureau chief for The Jerusalem Post and has contributed to publications such as The New Republic and Politico. Her work has been recognized with awards, including the 2016 B’nai B’rith World Center Award for Journalism for Excellence in Diaspora Reportage and the 2017 Simon Rockower Award for excellence in covering Zionism, Aliyah, and Israel. In her reporting, Sommer often explores the intersection of U.S. and Israeli politics, as well as issues affecting the Jewish diaspora. Her recent article, "'Enemy Inside the Wire': Steve Bannon's Toxic Take on Jews, Israel and the Far Right," reflects her commitment to analyzing complex and sensitive topics within the Jewish community and broader political landscape.

Allison Kaplan Sommer's article in Haaretz, titled "'Enemy Inside the Wire': Steve Bannon's Toxic Take on Jews, Israel and the Far Right," delves into Steve Bannon's recent statements and actions that have sparked significant controversy. Bannon, a prominent figure in far-right politics and former advisor to President Donald Trump, has made remarks suggesting that the primary adversaries of Israel are not external threats but rather American Jews who do not support Israel or the MAGA (Make America Great Again) movement. He stated, "The biggest enemy you have is inside the wire: progressive Jewish billionaires that are funding all this stuff."

Key Points:

Internal Division Among Jews: Bannon's rhetoric implies a division within the Jewish community, positioning progressive American Jews as adversaries to Israel. This narrative fosters internal discord and portrays a segment of Jews as threats to their own community.
Alignment with Far-Right Nationalism: Bannon attempts to align unwavering support for Israel with far-right nationalist ideologies. By doing so, he seeks to create a coalition between pro-Israel stances and extreme right-wing movements, potentially alienating Jews who hold diverse political views.
Antisemitic Undertones: His comments echo longstanding antisemitic tropes that question the loyalty of Jews, suggesting that those who do not align with specific political ideologies are enemies from within. This rhetoric can perpetuate harmful stereotypes and increase antisemitic sentiments.
Controversial Gestures: At the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC), Bannon made a gesture resembling a Nazi salute, which he later dismissed as a harmless wave. This action drew criticism from various quarters, including far-right figures like French politician Jordan Bardella, who canceled his CPAC appearance in protest.

Further Explanation:

Bannon's strategy appears to be an effort to redefine the narrative around support for Israel, tying it closely to far-right nationalism. This approach not only seeks to marginalize progressive Jews but also attempts to reshape the political alliances surrounding Israel, potentially driving a wedge between different factions within the Jewish diaspora and between diaspora Jews and Israel.

By casting progressive Jewish individuals and organizations as internal enemies, Bannon taps into divisive tactics that can fracture communal solidarity. This internal strife serves to weaken collective action and can isolate those who advocate for a more nuanced or critical approach to Israeli policies.

Moreover, the incorporation of gestures and symbols associated with historical antisemitism, whether intentional or not, signals a troubling normalization of extremist imagery in mainstream political discourse. Such actions not only offend but also embolden fringe elements that interpret these gestures as validation of their hateful ideologies.

In summary, Bannon's recent conduct exemplifies a deliberate intertwining of pro-Israel rhetoric with far-right nationalism, employing divisive language and controversial actions that risk deepening rifts within the Jewish community and between Jews and broader political movements.

Comments

When Crusaders Go Digital: Old Wars, New Costumes, Same Bloodlust

History, it seems, has developed a dark sense of humor. After centuries of reflection, scholarship, and solemn declarations of “never again,” we now find elected officials—armed not with swords but with AI filters —cosplaying as Crusaders . Progress , apparently, means upgrading from iron armor to algorithmic propaganda. Let’s begin where this story actually starts—not in Washington, not in Tel Aviv, but nearly a thousand years ago, when Europe launched what it called “holy wars.” ⚔️ The Original Crusades: A Brief Reminder The Crusades (1095–1291) were not a single war but a series of campaigns initiated after Pope Urban II’s call at Clermont in 1095. His message was simple and devastatingly effective: reclaim Jerusalem, and God will reward you. What followed was not a clean clash of armies, but waves of violence that engulfed entire regions—from France and Germany through Hungary, into Byzantium, Antioch, and Palestine. Historians caution that medieval records are fragmented, but acro...

The War That Wins on Paper—and Bleeds in Reality

The War That Always Works—Until It Doesn’t There is a certain elegance to modern war. Not the destruction. Not the bodies. But the presentation . The language is always impeccable: “ Strategic degradation” “Precision targeting” “Limited objectives” It almost sounds like a policy workshop — not the opening act of something that may consume an entire region. And once again, the script is being rehearsed. Iran is “weakened.” Its systems are “degraded.” Its options are “limited.” And somewhere between these carefully chosen words, a very old idea quietly returns: Maybe this time, we finish it. Chapter One: The Seduction of Air Power Airstrikes are irresistible. They promise control without commitment. Dominance without vulnerability. Victory without presence. You can bomb a country… without ever having to meet it . No dialects to understand. No terrain to navigate. No জনগোষ্ঠী to confront. Just coordinates. And for a brief moment— it feels like war ...

Ceasefires, Fireworks, and the Fine Art of Calling Ashes “Peace”

There is something almost poetic about declaring victory while the smoke is still rising. Not poetic in the romantic sense—more in the way a press release can be mistaken for reality if repeated often enough. So here we are. Another “ceasefire.” Another “agreement.” Another feather in the ever-expanding, never-examined peacemaking cap of Donald Trump . Israel–Iran. Israel–Hezbollah. Israel–Hamas. One could be forgiven for thinking peace has broken out everywhere—if peace meant pauses between airstrikes . The Theater of Victory On cue, Benjamin Netanyahu steps forward, flanked by ministers who speak the language of triumph as if it were immune to contradiction. “Iran weakened.” “Hezbollah contained.” “Total victory.” It all sounds remarkably similar to past declarations—just before the next round of fighting. Because here’s the inconvenient detail buried beneath the applause: none of the stated objectives were actually achieved. Iran still has its missiles. Hezboll...

Morality Compass? Or a Weapon of Convenience

There is something almost poetic about the sudden rediscovery of morality in war. Not morality itself. Not restraint. But the language of it. Because today, we are told—once again—that there are limits. That civilians matter. That infrastructure must not be touched. And yet, at the very same moment, Donald Trump openly threatens to “ obliterate” Iran’s infrastructure —including electric grids and water desalination plants , the very systems that keep millions alive. Water. Electricity. The basic architecture of survival . Not hidden in classified documents. Not whispered behind closed doors. But declared—casually, publicly, almost theatrically. So let’s ask again: Where exactly is this moral compass? Because if destroying water systems—knowing it will deprive civilians of drinking water—is not crossing a line, then perhaps the line was never there. Legal experts are not confused about this. Targeting such infrastructure is widely considered prohibited under internatio...

When the System Is Questioned by Its Own Guardians. A Warning Israel Can’t Dismiss.

When the Warning Comes From Within There are moments in history when criticism from the outside can be dismissed—but when it comes from within, it becomes something far more dangerous: a mirror. That is what makes the recent letter by the The London Initiative so unsettling. Jewish philanthropists. Rabbis. Community leaders. Not critics of Israel—but voices shaped by it—now warning Isaac Herzog that something has gone terribly wrong. Their charge is stark: extremist settler violence is no longer fringe— it is becoming normalized. The Numbers That Refuse to Stay Quiet This is not rhetoric. It is data. Israeli military data (reported by Haaretz ) shows settler attacks rose by 25% in 2025 845 attacks in 2025 alone , injuring around 200 Palestinians Since October 2023: over 1,700 recorded settler attacks Early 2026: an average of 4 incidents per day And according to the United Nations and field reporting: Hundreds of Palestinians injured already in 2026 Entire ...

Ainnbeen

Search This Blog