Skip to main content

"The war will only end when Israelis understand this simple truth": by Orly Noy. Key Points. +972 Magazine.

              Orly Noy. 


Brief introduction of Orly Noy 

Orly Noy is a prominent Israeli political activist, editor at Local Call, and chair of B'Tselem's executive board, an organization dedicated to documenting human rights violations in the occupied territories. She is also an activist with the Balad political party, which advocates for Palestinian rights and equality within Israel. In addition, Noy is a translator of Farsi poetry and prose, reflecting her Mizrahi heritage, and her work often explores themes of identity, justice, and the intersection of politics and culture.

 Detailed points of Orly Noy's article "The war will only end when Israelis understand this simple truth":


1. Emotional Reunions Amid Captivity:

Israelis celebrated the release of hostages, with nationwide emotional reactions.

Palestinians experienced similar joy for released prisoners, despite the destruction and suffering they endure.


2. Dehumanization of Palestinian Prisoners:

Palestinian detainees are labeled as “terrorists” in Israel, even without convictions.

Celebrations of their release are met with outrage and backlash in Israel.

She writes in her Column:

"In a madness-driven and vengeful Israel, Palestinian detainees are not seen as human beings, with parents, sisters, brothers, or friends who are overcome with anxiety over their fate. Only we Israelis are allowed to rejoice."

3. Ayman Odeh’s Controversial Statement:

Palestinian Knesset member Ayman Odeh’s call for freedom for both peoples led to racist backlash and efforts to expel him from the Knesset.


4. Continued Pain on Both Sides:

While some families reunite, many others, both Israelis and Palestinians, continue to endure uncertainty about their loved ones.


5. Critique of Israeli Leadership:

Prime Minister Netanyahu is criticized for his duplicitous approach, promising contradictory outcomes to different audiences.


6. Key to Ending the War:

The war will only end when Israelis recognize the immorality and futility of oppressing Palestinians.

True peace requires acknowledging Palestinians’ equal rights and humanity.

Ms. Orly Noy writes:

"It is astounding that after so many years of bloody conflict, the Israeli public still refuses to internalize this simple fact: as long as there is oppression, there will be resistance."

7. Inevitability of Resistance:

Oppression leads to resistance, and expecting Palestinians to accept subjugation is unrealistic and self-destructive.


8. Lessons from History:

Decades of occupation reveal the persistence of Israeli dominance and Palestinian resistance.


9. Atrocities Beyond Gaza:

The West Bank also suffers from violence, with settlers and soldiers perpetuating oppression and destruction.


10. Cycle of Violence:

Attempts to tighten control over Palestinians only fuel future uprisings, creating an endless cycle of violence.


11. Public Desire for Peace:

While most Israelis want the war to end, societal change is necessary to achieve peace based on equality and justice.


12. Call for a New Path:

The article concludes by urging Israelis to choose a path of equality, dignity, and justice over perpetual conflict.

Conclusion:

The article concludes that the war will not truly end through ceasefires, hostage exchanges, or military withdrawals. Instead, peace can only be achieved when Israeli society understands that oppression and subjugation of Palestinians are both immoral and unsustainable. True peace requires recognizing Palestinians as equals, entitled to the same rights and dignity. The cycle of violence will continue until Israelis reject the notion of living by the sword as their permanent destiny and instead choose a path of justice, equality, and coexistence.


Source:

https://www.972mag.com/israelis-end-war/




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Famine by design, Silence by Choice: 90,000 children are dying and still the UN can't find it's Spine.

  ✍️ By Malik Mukhtar | July 22, 2025 📍 From the graveyard of global morality: Gaza Let’s be clear. If a three-month-old baby named Yehia dies of starvation in his mother’s arms at Nasser Hospital, that should be enough for the world to say: “Enough.” But in today’s U.N., apparently 90,000 malnourished children, daily starvation deaths, and food rotting at the Gaza border still don’t meet the “technical ” threshold for famine . Welcome to the age of data-driven genocide , where unless a corpse is tagged with the right IPC Level 5 barcode , it's not really dead enough to matter. 📉 No Data? No Problem. Just Ignore the Bones. Let’s break this down. The Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) — a bureaucratic tool forged in the fires of humanitarian intention — tells us that famine exists when: 20% of households face extreme food shortage, Acute malnutrition in children exceeds 30%, Deaths exceed 2 per 10,000 per day. But wait — Gaza’s under siege, aid...

🏗️ Corporate Complicity in Genocide: The Global Economy Behind Gaza’s Ruin.

📅 July 5, 2025 “We are witnessing not just genocide in Gaza—but a genocide made profitable.” — UN Special Rapporteur, A/HRC/59/23 “This report is written from the heart of darkness . It is penned with a broken hand from a broken land for a broken people . But its words are not broken . They are the words of law and of longing . They are the words of those who are not yet silenced . It is written for Palestinians , first and foremost. It is also addressed to those who remain silent , indifferent or complicit . And it is a call to action for those who are not.” — Introduction, UN Report A/HRC/59/23 In an unprecedented and unflinching report to the UN Human Rights Council, the Special Rapporteur on the Occupied Palestinian Territory has laid bare the truth that much of the world’s corporate, academic, and financial architecture is actively complicit in Israel’s occupation, apartheid, and now, genocide in Gaza. This isn’t just about military aggression . This is about the mac...

"Globalize the Intifada”—Or How to Offend Power by Naming Its Crimes

  📰 The New York Times and the Art of Grieving Selectively ✍️ By Malik Mukhtar 📍 ainnbeen.blogspot.com 📅 July 2, 2025 Bret Stephens is upset. Again. Apparently, he’s still recovering from Café Moment. And Passover in Netanya. And that one horrific morning in 2004 when he saw carnage on Azza Street. And he has every right to grieve those losses. Every human does. But here’s the thing: Some corpses get columns. Others get erased. Stephens, perched on the prestigious opinion page of The New York Times , just spent a full-length sermon condemning Zohran Mamdani—not for what he said, but for what he refused to denounce: the phrase “ globalize the intifada.” According to Bret, refusing to ritually cleanse your political career with the holy water of pro-Israel respectability is now akin to blessing bus bombings. What “ globalize the intifada” really means, Mr. Stephens, is refusing to accept a world where genocide is livestreamed, and the world just shrugs. It means dari...

“Starving to Death, But Very Politely” — Gaza’s Famine and the Theater of Moral Collapse

📍Blog: ainnbeen.blogspot.com ✍️ By Malik Mukhtar | July 25, 2025 Let us all pause and thank the New York Times . After 21 months of bombing , blockade, and bullets , we finally have permission — no, confirmation — from America’s journal of record that yes, Gazans are, in fact, dying of starvation. The paper even sent reporters to Haifa, Jerusalem, and London — not Gaza, of course — to deliver the news. Skeletal toddlers, lactating mothers without milk, IV drips rationed like treasure — all neatly documented, sanitized, and wrapped in diplomatic passive voice. But fear not. The famine is not the fault of any one side. It's simply the result of “human failings , ” the report says. Ah yes, the tragedy of equal blame . A little siege here, a little looting there — and voilà! Starvation appears like a natural disaster . Like a famine tsunami . No perpetrators. Just poor little victims. Meanwhile, Israel, the world’s most moral occupier™ , is gallantly uploading videos of...

🩸 "If It Were Really Genocide, Wouldn’t More People Be Dead?" — The Cruel Logic of Bret Stephens

  ✍️ By Malik Mukhtar | July 23, 2025 So let’s all take a moment to appreciate the cold brilliance of Bret Stephens , New York Times columnist and self-appointed moral compass for the apocalypse. In his latest masterstroke of ethical reasoning , he argues that the claim of genocide in Gaza rings hollow — not because tens of thousands haven’t been killed , but because not enough have. “It may seem harsh to say, but there is a glaring dissonance to the charge that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza.” “If the Israeli government’s intentions and actions are truly genocidal — if it is so malevolent that it is committed to the annihilation of Gazans — why hasn’t it been more methodical and vastly more deadly?” Ah yes, the ol’ “ not genocidal enough” defense — a timeless classic. You see, according to Stephens, genocide must be more “ methodical ,” more “ deadly .” A mere 60,000 deaths (as reported by Gaza’s health ministry) over two years of war doesn’t meet the qu...