Skip to main content

"The war will only end when Israelis understand this simple truth": by Orly Noy. Key Points. +972 Magazine.

              Orly Noy. 


Brief introduction of Orly Noy 

Orly Noy is a prominent Israeli political activist, editor at Local Call, and chair of B'Tselem's executive board, an organization dedicated to documenting human rights violations in the occupied territories. She is also an activist with the Balad political party, which advocates for Palestinian rights and equality within Israel. In addition, Noy is a translator of Farsi poetry and prose, reflecting her Mizrahi heritage, and her work often explores themes of identity, justice, and the intersection of politics and culture.

 Detailed points of Orly Noy's article "The war will only end when Israelis understand this simple truth":


1. Emotional Reunions Amid Captivity:

Israelis celebrated the release of hostages, with nationwide emotional reactions.

Palestinians experienced similar joy for released prisoners, despite the destruction and suffering they endure.


2. Dehumanization of Palestinian Prisoners:

Palestinian detainees are labeled as “terrorists” in Israel, even without convictions.

Celebrations of their release are met with outrage and backlash in Israel.

She writes in her Column:

"In a madness-driven and vengeful Israel, Palestinian detainees are not seen as human beings, with parents, sisters, brothers, or friends who are overcome with anxiety over their fate. Only we Israelis are allowed to rejoice."

3. Ayman Odeh’s Controversial Statement:

Palestinian Knesset member Ayman Odeh’s call for freedom for both peoples led to racist backlash and efforts to expel him from the Knesset.


4. Continued Pain on Both Sides:

While some families reunite, many others, both Israelis and Palestinians, continue to endure uncertainty about their loved ones.


5. Critique of Israeli Leadership:

Prime Minister Netanyahu is criticized for his duplicitous approach, promising contradictory outcomes to different audiences.


6. Key to Ending the War:

The war will only end when Israelis recognize the immorality and futility of oppressing Palestinians.

True peace requires acknowledging Palestinians’ equal rights and humanity.

Ms. Orly Noy writes:

"It is astounding that after so many years of bloody conflict, the Israeli public still refuses to internalize this simple fact: as long as there is oppression, there will be resistance."

7. Inevitability of Resistance:

Oppression leads to resistance, and expecting Palestinians to accept subjugation is unrealistic and self-destructive.


8. Lessons from History:

Decades of occupation reveal the persistence of Israeli dominance and Palestinian resistance.


9. Atrocities Beyond Gaza:

The West Bank also suffers from violence, with settlers and soldiers perpetuating oppression and destruction.


10. Cycle of Violence:

Attempts to tighten control over Palestinians only fuel future uprisings, creating an endless cycle of violence.


11. Public Desire for Peace:

While most Israelis want the war to end, societal change is necessary to achieve peace based on equality and justice.


12. Call for a New Path:

The article concludes by urging Israelis to choose a path of equality, dignity, and justice over perpetual conflict.

Conclusion:

The article concludes that the war will not truly end through ceasefires, hostage exchanges, or military withdrawals. Instead, peace can only be achieved when Israeli society understands that oppression and subjugation of Palestinians are both immoral and unsustainable. True peace requires recognizing Palestinians as equals, entitled to the same rights and dignity. The cycle of violence will continue until Israelis reject the notion of living by the sword as their permanent destiny and instead choose a path of justice, equality, and coexistence.


Source:

https://www.972mag.com/israelis-end-war/




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ceasefires, Fireworks, and the Fine Art of Calling Ashes “Peace”

  There is something almost poetic about declaring victory while the smoke is still rising. Not poetic in the romantic sense—more in the way a press release can be mistaken for reality if repeated often enough. So here we are. Another “ceasefire.” Another “agreement.” Another feather in the ever-expanding, never-examined peacemaking cap of Donald Trump . Israel–Iran. Israel–Hezbollah. Israel–Hamas. One could be forgiven for thinking peace has broken out everywhere—if peace meant pauses between airstrikes . The Theater of Victory On cue, Benjamin Netanyahu steps forward, flanked by ministers who speak the language of triumph as if it were immune to contradiction. “Iran weakened.” “Hezbollah contained.” “Total victory.” It all sounds remarkably similar to past declarations—just before the next round of fighting. Because here’s the inconvenient detail buried beneath the applause: none of the stated objectives were actually achieved. Iran still has its missiles. Hezboll...

When a Constitution Becomes a Decorative Document America’s Latest War, and the Curious Death of Accountability

  There is an imperial comedy unfolding before the world — dark enough to be tragedy, absurd enough to be satire. This is, after all, the very “model democracy” United States  has spent decades promising to export to humanity — by missile, by occupation, by sanctions, by “shock and awe,” by solemn lectures on liberty delivered from polished podiums standing atop broken nations. This was the sermon preached to Iraq. Imposed on Afghanistan. Invoked amid the destruction of Libya . Entangled in the agony of Syria. Echoed through the devastation of Yemen.  The doctrine was always wrapped in noble language: Rule of law. Democratic institutions. Constitutional order. Checks and balances. How magnificent those words sound — right up until power decides they are optional at home. What a remarkable export product: A democracy where Congress yields, courts hesitate, executive power expands, wars begin first and legal arguments arrive later — wrapped in flags, marketed...

The Confession Without Consequence When Empire Admits the Crime… and Funds It Anyway

  There are moments in history when power accidentally tells the truth. Not because conscience triumphs. Not because morality suddenly awakens. But because the wreckage becomes too vast to keep describing as “complicated.” That moment arrived when — a pillar of Washington’s foreign policy establishment, veteran diplomat, architect of negotiations, insider to empire’s machinery — uttered words that would once have been politically unthinkable: “ Prime Minister Netanyahu has led us down a road — and we have been part of it — that has, in essence, created a genocide in Gaza that has destabilize d the Middle East.” Read that again. Not they . We. Not Israel alone . We have been part of it. That single phrase — “we have been part of it” — may be one of the most consequential admissions made by a former senior American official in modern Middle Eastern history. For decades, Washington supplied the bombs, shielded the diplomacy, vetoed accountability, framed slaughter as...

When the Readers Move Ahead of the Columnist

  There is something quietly seismic happening—not in the corridors of power, not in carefully worded opinion columns, but in the comment sections beneath them. While attempts to diagnose where Israel “lost its way,” the readers seem to be asking a far more unsettling question: What if it didn’t lose its way at all? What if this is the way? For decades, the comforting narrative was simple: the problem was leadership. Replace , and the moral arc would gently correct itself. Peace would again become plausible. Restraint would return. The “real Israel” would re-emerge. But the readers are no longer convinced. They are pointing to something deeper—something less convenient. Not a deviation. A pattern. Not an exception. A structure. Because when policies persist across decades, across governments, across crises—at what point do we stop calling them mistakes and start calling them design? The Quiet Collapse of a Narrative One reader puts it bluntly: Palestinians have alr...

At 78, a Nation at War With Itself

There is a haunting irony in watching a state built on the promise of refuge become trapped in fear of its own reflection. For decades, **** was one of the men entrusted with Israel’s sword — soldier, commander, prime minister, architect of its security doctrine. Not a radical voice. Not an outsider. Not a dissident shouting from the margins. An insider. And when insiders begin speaking the language of alarm, history listens differently . His warning is not that Israel may be destroyed by rockets, tunnels, militias, or regional enemies. His warning is more unsettling: that Israel may survive every external war — and lose itself from within. That is a far more tragic form of defeat. A nation can repel missiles and still watch its institutions hollow out . A nation can dominate battlefields and still become morally exhausted. A nation can claim victory abroad while quietly burying democracy at home . This is the paradox now confronting Israel at 78: militarily formidable, technologic...