"One Short Statement Reveals: Netanyahu Still Accepts Hamas as Gaza's Governing Power" Amir Tibon. Haaretz. Key Points

Amir Tibon.

Key Points from Amir Tibon’s Haaretz Article

1. Netanyahu’s Contradiction on Hamas

Despite Netanyahu's repeated promises to destroy Hamas, recent events suggest a tacit acceptance of the group's governing role in Gaza.

His latest statement following a chaotic hostage release reinforced Hamas’s authority rather than undermining it.

2. Hamas Ensured Hostage Safety, Not Israel

The hostage release process turned chaotic when a mob of Gazan civilians surrounded the captives.

Instead of Israeli forces ensuring their safety, Hamas militants intervened and protected the hostages.

This undermines Israel’s claim that it is eliminating Hamas’s operational control in Gaza.

3. Netanyahu’s Statement Recognized Hamas’s Role

Instead of downplaying Hamas's role or focusing on Israel's efforts, Netanyahu’s statement implicitly acknowledged Hamas as the governing power in Gaza.

His words suggested that, despite the war, Hamas still has the ability to enforce order and make crucial decisions.

4. Reinforcing Hamas’s Power Instead of Dismantling It

Netanyahu's approach, instead of weakening Hamas, seems to have reinforced its legitimacy.

Hamas remains the central player in negotiating hostage deals and maintaining order in Gaza, even under heavy Israeli military pressure.

This raises questions about Israel’s actual strategy in Gaza—whether it is truly eliminating Hamas or simply managing the conflict.

5. Political and Strategic Implications

This incident may further damage Netanyahu’s credibility, both domestically and internationally.

If Israel cannot prevent Hamas from controlling key aspects of Gaza’s governance, Netanyahu’s war objectives may appear unachievable.

Critics might argue that Netanyahu is prioritizing his political survival over genuine efforts to dismantle Hamas.

This analysis suggests that Israel's strategy in Gaza is facing serious contradictions—militarily trying to defeat Hamas while politically engaging with it, even if indirectly.

Comments

Price Tag Attackers: Extremist Settler Violence in the West Bank.

Year-by-year breakdown of documented " Price Tag" attacks in the West Bank and Israel , based on reports from UN OCHA , B’Tselem , Yesh Din , and Israeli media (Haaretz, Times of Israel). Introduction to "Price Tag" Attackers "Price Tag" attackers are extremist Israeli settlers , primarily affiliated with radical right-wing groups, who carry out violent acts agains Palestinians, Israeli security forces, and left-wing activists in retaliation for perceived threats to Jewish settlements in the West Bank . The term refers to the " price " they seek to impose for actions like outpost demolitions or Palestinian attacks on Israelis. - Vandalism, arson, or violence by extremist settlers against Palestinians, Israeli security forces, or left-wing activists. - Often involves graffiti (e.g., "Price Tag," "Revenge," or "Arabs Out"). - Retaliation for Palestinian attacks, outpost demolitions, or Israeli gover...

The Politicization of Antisemitism: Randy Fine, AIPAC, and the Fight Over Anti-Israel Speech

Randy Fine. Brief introduction of Randy Fine. Randy Fine is a U.S. Representative-Elect for Florida's 6th Congressional District and a former Florida State Senator . Born on April 20, 1974, in Tucson , Arizona , Fine holds degrees from Harvard College and Harvard Business School . He began his political career in 2016 as a member of the Florida House of Representatives and later served in the Florida Senate. Fine is known for his strong pro-Israel stance, earning him the nickname " Hebrew Hammer, " and his socially conservative views . He has been involved in contentious legislation and has faced both support and criticism for his policies and rhetoric. Detailed overview of Randy Fine 's stance and legislative efforts related to criminalizing the distribution of anti-Israel flyers, along with broader context about his political agenda and controversies : --- 1. Randy Fine’s Legislative Efforts Against Anti-Israel Flyers - Florida’s Hate Crime Law (2023): ...

Sambhal and the Architecture of Majoritarian Power: From Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh to Narendra Modi.

In the city of Sambhal, the future of India is being rehearsed in plain sight. Three-quarters of the city’s 300,000 residents are Muslim. Yet today, many say they live as if under occupation — their public religious life curtailed, their protests criminalized, their grief surveilled. The spark was a legal challenge to the 16th-century Shahi Jama Masjid , a mosque that Hindu nationalists claim was built over a sacred Hindu site. After a court-ordered archaeological survey, tensions exploded. Police fired tear gas and live rounds. Families say at least five people were killed. Hundreds were booked. Thousands were listed as “unnamed accused,” a legal cloud that can expand at will. Internet shut down. City sealed. Dissent crushed. Sambhal is not an anomaly. It is a method. The Ideological Spine: Hindutva and the RSS To understand Sambhal, one must understand the ideological infrastructure behind it. The (RSS), founded in 1925, promotes Hindutva — the idea that India is fun...

When Diplomacy Becomes a Filter: The Truth Washington May Never Have Heard About Gaza

By Malik Mukhtar | A Voice for Gaza When reports of human suffering are altered, delayed, or buried, the damage extends beyond diplomatic procedure. It reaches the people whose lives depend on decisions made in distant capitals. The most dangerous silence is the one manufactured inside the corridors of power On October 8, 2026, an investigation published by The New York Times raised a disturbing question about the integrity of American diplomacy : What happens when the officials entrusted with reporting the facts begin filtering those facts through a political preference? The investigation alleged that David Milstein , a senior adviser to U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee, repeatedly suppressed, delayed, or substantially altered internal embassy reporting in ways that portrayed Benjamin Netanyahu’s government more favorably to Washington. The report drew on interviews with 15 current U.S. officials and nine former diplomats, alongside internal communications reviewed...

The Cracks Are No Longer Hairline

For decades, Washington treated support for Israel as something beyond debate. It was political scripture. Republicans defended it. Democrats defended it. Presidents came and went, wars came and went, thousands died, settlements expanded, Gaza burned, and the checks kept arriving. Questioning the arrangement was once political suicide. Now the walls are cracking. This week, more than half of House Democrats either voted to end U.S. aid to Israel or refused to oppose doing so. The amendment failed, but something far more important succeeded. The illusion collapsed. For years, American politicians insisted that criticism of Israeli government policy belonged only to "the fringe." Apparently the fringe has become half the Democratic caucus. History has an unusual sense of humor. The same establishment that spent years dismissing students, academics, humanitarian workers, doctors, journalists, and millions of protesters as naïve, radical, or antisemitic now finds itself strugglin...

Ainnbeen

Search This Blog