Skip to main content

"Being Jewish After the Destruction of Gaza: A Reckoning". Peter Beinart. Key Points. Theguardian.

 


Key Points from Peter Beinart’s Interview on Being Jewish After the Destruction of Gaza: A Reckoning.



            Peter Beinart. 


1. Beinart’s Transformation on Israel and Zionism

Former Defender of Israel: In the early 2000s, Beinart was one of Israel’s most prominent American defenders.

Rejection of Key Zionist Tenets: He now rejects the idea that Israel can be both a Jewish and democratic state.

Support for Palestinian Rights: Advocates for Palestinian refugees’ right to return to historic Palestine.


2. The Book’s Purpose and Audience

Intended for Jewish Readers: Beinart aims to reach Jews who have been uncritical of Israel’s actions.

Addressing Moral Pathology: He believes many Jewish spaces tolerate inhumane views towards Palestinians.

Engaging Younger Jews: Seeks to provide a moral and cultural reckoning for alienated young Jews.


3. Judaism, Morality, and the State of Israel

Judaism as Both Universal and Familial: While Judaism carries a universal ethical message, it also fosters a sense of exclusive communal solidarity.

State Power and Jewish Identity: The combination of Jewish solidarity and Israeli state power has led to rationalizations of violence.

Judaism’s Core Message of Human Worth: Beinart argues that Israel’s actions in Gaza desecrate Judaism’s fundamental belief in human equality.


4. American Jewish Complicity in Israel’s Actions

Unconditional Support for Israel: Many Jewish institutions treat support for Israel as central to Jewish identity.

Forms of Complicity:

Political lobbying (e.g., through AIPAC)

Ritualistic support (e.g., prayers for the IDF in synagogues)

Lack of engagement with Palestinian voices.


5. Beinart’s Personal Journey of Change

Slow Process of Unlearning: Over two decades, Beinart moved away from Zionist narratives.

Impact of Visiting the West Bank: Seeing Palestinian suffering firsthand forced him to confront his biases.

Fear of Social and Career Repercussions: Acknowledges that fear and privilege delayed his shift.


6. Distinguishing Judaism from Zionism

Zionism’s Complex Relationship with Judaism: Initially a nationalist movement that later intertwined with Jewish religious identity.

Zionism and Jewish Symbols: The Israeli flag, menorah, and Star of David have been politicized.

The Double Standard in Jewish Discourse: Jewish leaders conflate Zionism with Judaism while expecting others to separate the two.


7. Engaging with Zionist Students in Progressive Circles

Education Over Exclusion: Encourages dialogue rather than outright rejection.

Challenging Zionist Perspectives: Believes exposing Zionist students to Palestinian voices can be transformative.

Avoiding False Equivalence: While not advocating censorship, he does not equate Zionist identity with white supremacy.


8. The Ceasefire and U.S. Influence

Acknowledges U.S. Leverage: Believes U.S. pressure on Israel led to a temporary ceasefire.

Critique of Israel’s Military Strategy: Argues Israel lacks a political solution for Palestinians, leading to endless cycles of destruction.


9. Hope for Collective Liberation

Beyond Material Optimism: Sees hope as a necessity rather than a rational calculation.

Parallels with South African Apartheid: Believes in a future where Israeli Jews and Palestinians coexist as equals.

A Vision for Reconciliation: Advocates full refugee return and historical justice.


---

Notable Quotes from the Interview

On Jewish Identity and Morality:

> “What Israel has done in Gaza is the most profound desecration of the central idea of the absolute and infinite worth of every human being.”

On American Jewish Complicity:

> “The organized American Jewish community acts as if Palestinians in Gaza have essentially no value.”

On Fear and Personal Change:

> “I was able to shed the preconceptions that so many Jews are raised with about Palestiniansthat they have a tendency towards violence.”

On Hope for the Future:

> “Imagine if this story of Palestine and Israel, which is now a story of genocide and apartheid, became a story of collective liberation.”


Beinart’s book serves as both a critique of Jewish support for Israeli policies and a call for moral and political transformation within the Jewish community.

Source: 

https://www.theguardian.com/world/ng-interactive/2025/jan/27/israel-gaza-us-jews-peter-beinart?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Famine by design, Silence by Choice: 90,000 children are dying and still the UN can't find it's Spine.

  ✍️ By Malik Mukhtar | July 22, 2025 📍 From the graveyard of global morality: Gaza Let’s be clear. If a three-month-old baby named Yehia dies of starvation in his mother’s arms at Nasser Hospital, that should be enough for the world to say: “Enough.” But in today’s U.N., apparently 90,000 malnourished children, daily starvation deaths, and food rotting at the Gaza border still don’t meet the “technical ” threshold for famine . Welcome to the age of data-driven genocide , where unless a corpse is tagged with the right IPC Level 5 barcode , it's not really dead enough to matter. 📉 No Data? No Problem. Just Ignore the Bones. Let’s break this down. The Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) — a bureaucratic tool forged in the fires of humanitarian intention — tells us that famine exists when: 20% of households face extreme food shortage, Acute malnutrition in children exceeds 30%, Deaths exceed 2 per 10,000 per day. But wait — Gaza’s under siege, aid...

🏗️ Corporate Complicity in Genocide: The Global Economy Behind Gaza’s Ruin.

📅 July 5, 2025 “We are witnessing not just genocide in Gaza—but a genocide made profitable.” — UN Special Rapporteur, A/HRC/59/23 “This report is written from the heart of darkness . It is penned with a broken hand from a broken land for a broken people . But its words are not broken . They are the words of law and of longing . They are the words of those who are not yet silenced . It is written for Palestinians , first and foremost. It is also addressed to those who remain silent , indifferent or complicit . And it is a call to action for those who are not.” — Introduction, UN Report A/HRC/59/23 In an unprecedented and unflinching report to the UN Human Rights Council, the Special Rapporteur on the Occupied Palestinian Territory has laid bare the truth that much of the world’s corporate, academic, and financial architecture is actively complicit in Israel’s occupation, apartheid, and now, genocide in Gaza. This isn’t just about military aggression . This is about the mac...

"Globalize the Intifada”—Or How to Offend Power by Naming Its Crimes

  📰 The New York Times and the Art of Grieving Selectively ✍️ By Malik Mukhtar 📍 ainnbeen.blogspot.com 📅 July 2, 2025 Bret Stephens is upset. Again. Apparently, he’s still recovering from Café Moment. And Passover in Netanya. And that one horrific morning in 2004 when he saw carnage on Azza Street. And he has every right to grieve those losses. Every human does. But here’s the thing: Some corpses get columns. Others get erased. Stephens, perched on the prestigious opinion page of The New York Times , just spent a full-length sermon condemning Zohran Mamdani—not for what he said, but for what he refused to denounce: the phrase “ globalize the intifada.” According to Bret, refusing to ritually cleanse your political career with the holy water of pro-Israel respectability is now akin to blessing bus bombings. What “ globalize the intifada” really means, Mr. Stephens, is refusing to accept a world where genocide is livestreamed, and the world just shrugs. It means dari...

“Starving to Death, But Very Politely” — Gaza’s Famine and the Theater of Moral Collapse

📍Blog: ainnbeen.blogspot.com ✍️ By Malik Mukhtar | July 25, 2025 Let us all pause and thank the New York Times . After 21 months of bombing , blockade, and bullets , we finally have permission — no, confirmation — from America’s journal of record that yes, Gazans are, in fact, dying of starvation. The paper even sent reporters to Haifa, Jerusalem, and London — not Gaza, of course — to deliver the news. Skeletal toddlers, lactating mothers without milk, IV drips rationed like treasure — all neatly documented, sanitized, and wrapped in diplomatic passive voice. But fear not. The famine is not the fault of any one side. It's simply the result of “human failings , ” the report says. Ah yes, the tragedy of equal blame . A little siege here, a little looting there — and voilà! Starvation appears like a natural disaster . Like a famine tsunami . No perpetrators. Just poor little victims. Meanwhile, Israel, the world’s most moral occupier™ , is gallantly uploading videos of...

🩸 "If It Were Really Genocide, Wouldn’t More People Be Dead?" — The Cruel Logic of Bret Stephens

  ✍️ By Malik Mukhtar | July 23, 2025 So let’s all take a moment to appreciate the cold brilliance of Bret Stephens , New York Times columnist and self-appointed moral compass for the apocalypse. In his latest masterstroke of ethical reasoning , he argues that the claim of genocide in Gaza rings hollow — not because tens of thousands haven’t been killed , but because not enough have. “It may seem harsh to say, but there is a glaring dissonance to the charge that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza.” “If the Israeli government’s intentions and actions are truly genocidal — if it is so malevolent that it is committed to the annihilation of Gazans — why hasn’t it been more methodical and vastly more deadly?” Ah yes, the ol’ “ not genocidal enough” defense — a timeless classic. You see, according to Stephens, genocide must be more “ methodical ,” more “ deadly .” A mere 60,000 deaths (as reported by Gaza’s health ministry) over two years of war doesn’t meet the qu...