Skip to main content

The $36 Trillion Question: America's Rising Debt and Ballooning Deficits



The United States is currently facing significant fiscal challenges, with the national debt surpassing $36 trillion and the budget deficit reaching $1.8 trillion in fiscal year 2024.  

In a recent discussion, Bloomberg columnists Robert Burgess and Clive Crook analyzed the implications of these developments. 


National Debt and Budget Deficit Overview

National Debt: The U.S. national debt has experienced a rapid increase, rising from $19.5 trillion in 2016 to over $36 trillion by November 2024. This escalation has elevated the debt-to-GDP ratio from approximately 105% to around 120%, indicating a growing burden relative to the nation's economic output

Budget Deficit: In fiscal year 2024, the federal government reported a budget deficit of $1.8 trillion, marking the third-highest deficit on record. This deficit persists despite an 11% increase in revenues, highlighting the challenges in balancing government spending and income. 

Key Insights from Burgess and Crook

Robert Burgess: Burgess emphasizes the broader economic context, noting that while the debt levels are concerning, the strength of the U.S. dollar and the country's economic resilience provide some buffer against immediate fiscal crises. He suggests that the current debt levels, though high, may not precipitate an immediate financial disaster. 

Clive Crook: Crook expresses apprehension about the trajectory of the national debt, warning that continued fiscal indiscipline could lead to a loss of investor confidence and potential market upheavals. He advocates for proactive fiscal reforms to address the underlying issues contributing to the growing debt. 

Implications and Considerations

Interest Payments: The cost of servicing the national debt is escalating, with net interest payments reaching a record $882 billion in fiscal year 2024. This increase diverts funds from other critical government programs and underscores the urgency of addressing the debt issue. 

Political Landscape: The upcoming presidential election features candidates proposing policies that could further impact the national debt. For instance, discussions around reversing certain executive actions have been suggested as potential measures to reduce the deficit. 

Conclusion

The escalating national debt and budget deficit present significant challenges for the United States. While opinions differ on the immediacy of the threat, there is a consensus on the need for fiscal responsibility to ensure long-term economic stability. Addressing these issues will require a combination of policy reforms, spending adjustments, and potentially new revenue sources to place the nation on a more sustainable fiscal path.









Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When the Warning Comes from the General Moshe Ya’alon, Jewish Supremacy, and the Echo Nobody Wanted to Hear

History has a cruel sense of irony. Sometimes the most devastating indictments do not come from the oppressed, the bombed, the buried, or the silenced—but from the very architects of power who once swore they were different. This week, that indictment came from Moshe Ya’alon : former Israeli Defense Minister, former IDF Chief of Staff, lifelong pillar of Israel’s security establishment. Not a dissident poet. Not a radical academic. Not a Palestinian survivor. A general. And what he said shattered the last polite illusion. “ The ideology of Jewish supremacy that has become dominant in the Israeli government is reminiscent of Nazi race theory.” Pause there. Sit with it. This was not shouted at a protest . It was not scribbled on a placard. It was written calmly, deliberately, after attending a Holocaust Remembrance ceremony —then reading reports of Jewish settlers attacking Palestinians , blocking ambulances , fracturing skulls , burning homes. Never Again, apparently, now ...

“Not Auschwitz — Yet Still Genocide”: When Israeli Holocaust Historians Break the Silence on Gaza

  There are moments in history when the most unsettling truths do not come from one’s enemies, but from within. From those who know the past most intimately. From those whose moral authority is built not on ideology, but on memory. In December 2025, two of Israel’s most respected Holocaust and genocide scholars— Prof. Daniel Blatman and Prof. Amos Goldberg of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem—published a deeply unsettling opinion article in Haaretz . What they argued was not casual, rhetorical, or activist hyperbole. It was a grave historical judgment. Their conclusion was stark: What is happening in Gaza is not Auschwitz. But it belongs to the same family of crimes: genocide. Why This Voice Matters Blatman and Goldberg are not marginal figures. They are historians whose professional lives have been devoted to studying Nazi crimes, genocide mechanisms, memory, and moral responsibility . Their scholarship is rooted in the very catastrophe that shaped modern Jewish iden...

Even the Dead Are Not Safe: How Power Desecrates Graves and Calls It Security

  There is a final dignity that every civilization, every faith, every moral tradition claims to respect: the dignity of the dead. In Gaza and the West Bank, even that has been revoked. Homes can be flattened. Children can be starved. Hospitals can be reduced to ash. These crimes, we are told, are “tragic necessities.” But graves ? What threat does a corpse pose to a modern army armed with drones , tanks , and nuclear ambiguity ? Apparently, enough to be bulldozed. Graves as Enemy Infrastructure According to detailed reporting by Al Jazeera , Israeli forces in Gaza did not merely fight the living — they waged war on cemeteries . Tombstones were crushed. Graves were excavated . Human remains were scattered, mixed, lost . Families returned not to mourning, but to forensic horror: bones without names, names without bodies. This was not collateral damage . This was not crossfire. This was methodical excavation . Heavy machinery was deployed to retrieve the body of one ...

Don’t Spoil the Show: Gaza, Davos, and the Business Class of Peace

There is a rule at Davos—unwritten, but strictly enforced. Reality is bad for business. Yossi Alpher learned this the hard way. Sitting on a panel at a luxury resort near the Dead Sea, surrounded by ministers, executives, and conflict “experts,” he made the unforgivable mistake of speaking honestly. Grim facts. Grim assessments. No PowerPoint optimism. No Riviera renderings. No applause. A prominent Israeli industrialist later pulled him aside and explained the crime: “ Don’t spoil the show . The idea is to radiate optimism that nourishes an investment climate . It’s all about business. No room for realism .” That sentence may be the most accurate peace-process doctrine of the 21st century. Phase II: Now With Billionaires Fast forward to Davos again. This time, the stage is Gaza—or rather, Gaza™ , the investment opportunity. Trump’s “Board of Peace,” staffed by billionaires and brand managers of global destruction , announces Phase II of a Gaza peace plan with all the s...

Noam Chomsky and the Silence That Broke a Generation

There are betrayals that anger us. And then there are betrayals that leave us quiet. Noam Chomsky belongs to the second kind. For more than half a century, Chomsky stood as a moral compass in an age without direction . He taught generations how power lies, how empires manufacture consent, how language itself becomes a weapon in the hands of elites. He spoke for the voiceless when it was costly, unfashionable, and dangerous . For many of us, he was not merely an intellectual —he was a refuge . Proof that clarity could survive corruption. Proof that integrity could endure. Which is why this moment does not feel like scandal . It feels like mourning . Chris Hedges is right to frame the association between Noam Chomsky and Jeffrey Epstein not as gossip or moral theater, but as a rupture —a crack in something we believed was unbreakable . Epstein was not simply a criminal. He was the embodiment of everything Chomsky spent his life exposing : elite impunity, predation disguised as ...