Skip to main content

Navigating the Basmati Rice GI Tag Dispute: Perspectives from India and Pakistan

 


India has escalated its legal battle over Basmati rice by appealing to the European Court after the EU denied its request to access Pakistan's evidence regarding the rice's origin. This follows Pakistan's submission of proof to support its claim for a geographical indication (GI) tag, which the EU deemed sensitive for international relations. The ongoing dispute centers on India's application for exclusive GI status, which Pakistan opposes, fearing it could undermine its export interests in the EU market.


Geographical indication tag?

A Geographical Indication (GI) tag is a sign used on products that originate from a specific geographical location, indicating that the product possesses qualities or a reputation linked to that origin. The GI tag helps protect the unique characteristics of products, ensuring that only those produced in the designated area can use the name.

Key Points about GI Tags:

Legal Framework: In India, GI tags are regulated under the Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999.

Purpose: The primary aim is to prevent unauthorized use of the registered name, thereby safeguarding the interests of producers and ensuring consumers receive authentic products.

Examples: Notable examples of GI-tagged products include Darjeeling tea and Basmati rice.

GI tags play a crucial role in promoting local economies and preserving traditional practices associated with specific regions.


What are the main arguments India has used to support its claim for the GI tag for Basmati rice?

India's arguments for claiming a Geographical Indication (GI) tag for Basmati rice include:

Historical and Cultural Significance: India asserts that Basmati rice has been cultivated in the Indo-Gangetic Plains for centuries, forming part of its cultural heritage and culinary traditions16.

Unique Characteristics: The country emphasizes the distinct qualities of Indian Basmati, such as its long grains and aromatic properties, which are linked to specific agro-climatic conditions in northern India56.

Legal Compliance: India claims to have met the EU's regulatory requirements for GI protection, arguing that Basmati is produced in a defined geographical area that includes regions in India26.

Economic Impact: Securing the GI tag would enhance India's export potential, as Basmati fetches premium prices globally, thereby supporting local farmers and the economy25.

These points are central to India's ongoing dispute with Pakistan over the rice's origin and GI status.


How has Pakistan responded to India's application for the GI tag?

Pakistan has responded to India's application for a Geographical Indication (GI) tag for Basmati rice by vehemently opposing it. The Pakistani government has expressed its intent to challenge India's claim in the European Union (EU), asserting that both countries have a historical connection to Basmati cultivation. Pakistan argues that it should also be recognized for its production of Basmati rice, which is integral to its agricultural identity. Additionally, Pakistan has sought to establish its own GI status for Basmati, emphasizing the need to protect its interests in the international market.




What role does the EU's zero-tariff policy play in the Basmati rice dispute?

The EU's zero-tariff policy significantly impacts the Basmati rice dispute between India and Pakistan. Both countries benefit from zero import duties on specific Basmati varieties, which enhances their competitiveness in the EU market. However, this policy also


intensifies the rivalry as each nation seeks exclusive GI recognition to protect its economic interests.

Pakistan relies heavily on Basmati exports to the EU, with approximately 80% of its rice exports being super Basmati. Changes in the tariff regime could jeopardize its market position, especially if India secures exclusive GI rights, potentially leading to higher tariffs for Pakistani rice and economic losses for its farmers.


How might the re-publication of Pakistan's GI application affect the negotiations between India and the EU?

The re-publication of Pakistan's GI application by the EU may influence negotiations between India and the EU in several ways:

Strengthening India's Position: The EU's action is perceived as reinforcing India's claim to Basmati rice, suggesting that India is the primary holder of the GI rights. This could lead the EU to favor India's application during negotiations, potentially sidelining Pakistan's interests1.

Encouraging Bilateral Discussions: The EU may encourage India and Pakistan to engage in discussions regarding Basmati rice, particularly if it seeks a resolution that accommodates both parties. This could involve negotiating terms for joint recognition or registration of Basmati varieties12.

Impact on Export Dynamics: If India secures the GI tag, it could alter the competitive landscape for Basmati exports, affecting Pakistani exporters who rely on the EU market. This shift may necessitate adjustments in how both countries negotiate trade terms with the EU23.

Diplomatic Leverage: The situation may provide India with additional diplomatic leverage in its broader trade negotiations with the EU, particularly as both sides seek to establish mutually beneficial agreements on geographical indications3.

Overall, the re-publication could catalyze a more strategic approach to negotiations, emphasizing collaboration while protecting individual national interests.


What are the potential economic impacts for India and Pakistan if one country is granted the GI tag for Basmati rice?

If one country is granted the Geographical Indication (GI) tag for Basmati rice, the potential economic impacts for India and Pakistan could be significant:

For India

Market Exclusivity: India would gain exclusive rights to the Basmati name in the EU, enhancing its market position and allowing it to command higher prices for its exports. This could lead to increased revenue, as approximately 65% of EU Basmati imports currently come from India13.

Increased Exports: With GI protection, Indian exporters could potentially increase their market share in Europe, further solidifying their dominance in the premium rice segment3.

Brand Strengthening: The GI tag would strengthen India's brand identity for Basmati rice, reducing the risk of imitation and misuse by other countries1.

For Pakistan

Market Losses: If India secures the GI tag, Pakistan could face significant economic repercussions, as it may be unable to sell its Basmati rice in the EU market under that name. This could lead to a sharp decline in exports, which constitute about 80% of its rice exports to Europe25.

Impact on Farmers: The loss of access to the EU market could severely affect Pakistani farmers' livelihoods, leading to economic instability in rural areas that depend on Basmati cultivation24.

Reputation Damage: The inability to market its rice as "Basmati" could diminish the perceived value of Pakistani rice internationally, impacting its competitiveness against other rice-producing nations3.

In summary, securing the GI tag for either country would have profound implications on trade dynamics, farmer livelihoods, and national economies.


What are the legal grounds for Pakistan to oppose India's GI application?

Pakistan's opposition to India's application for a Geographical Indication (GI) tag for Basmati rice is based on several legal grounds outlined in the EU's regulations:

Joint Product Claim: Pakistan argues that Basmati rice is a joint product of both India and Pakistan, suggesting that it should not be exclusively registered by one country due to shared historical and agricultural ties5.

Failure to Meet Eligibility Requirements: Under Article 10(1)(a) of the EU Regulation, Pakistan may contend that India has not fulfilled the basic eligibility and product specification requirements necessary for GI protection, despite India's apparent compliance14.

Geographical Delimitation: Pakistan could challenge the specific geographical areas listed in India's application, arguing that they do not accurately represent the terroir associated with authentic Basmati production, which could dilute the quality associated with the GI tag12.

Incompatibility with Existing Names: Although this ground may be weak, Pakistan might explore whether India's proposed name conflicts with existing plant varieties or trademarks, as stipulated in Article 10(1)(b).

Legal Framework for GI Protection: With the enactment of its own GI (Registration and Protection) Act in 2020, Pakistan now has a legal framework to support its claim and oppose India's application more robustly25.

These grounds form the basis of Pakistan's strategy to contest India's claim and protect its own economic interests in the Basmati rice market.


Are there specific varieties of basmati rice grown in Pakistan that are not found in India?

Yes, there are specific varieties of Basmati rice grown in Pakistan that are not found in India. Some notable Pakistani Basmati varieties include:

Super Basmati: Known for its long grains and aromatic qualities, it is highly valued both domestically and for export.

PK 385: Another popular variety that is recognized for its quality and yield.

D-98: This variety is also cultivated in Pakistan and is distinct from Indian varieties.

While some varieties, like Basmati 370 and Basmati 386, are common to both countries, the unique Pakistani varieties contribute to the distinct characteristic of Basmati rice produced in Pakistan, setting them apart from Indian counterparts

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Return to the Killing Fields: When Arab Silence Becomes Complicity

  In March 2025 , a flicker of hope broke through Gaza’s smoke-choked skies . Seventeen Palestinian children— each a living testimony to horror —were evacuated from the rubble of their homes and transported to Jordan for medical care. Some arrived with legs blown off at the thigh , tiny bodies bandaged like mummies. One boy, no older than ten , had both arms amputated and his face marked by deep burns —his eyes wide with trauma , silently screaming for comfort . A girl, barely breathing , had shrapnel embedded near her spine and could only speak in whispers —if at all. They came on stretchers , barely conscious , wrapped not in blankets but in sorrow . Their mothers were left behind, many buried under collapsed buildings or lost in the chaos of airstrikes. These children were not just patients— they were war’s rawest wounds, symbols of a people being systematically erased. And then, the unthinkable happened. These same children —these shattered, fragile souls—have now be...
Post a Comment
Read more

She Stitched Wounds With Empty Hands—And Lost All Nine of Her Children

In Gaza, where the sun rises over ash and broken concrete, where lullabies are drowned by the sound of drones, lived a woman whose hands brought healing to children even as the world around her collapsed. Her name was Dr. Alaa — a pediatrician , a mother , a lifeline in the middle of hell. And she has become a symbol of both the highest form of love and the deepest human suffering. Nine children. All hers. All dead. Killed in a single Israeli airstrike. Not soldiers . Not fighters . Just children — tucked beneath blankets, seeking safety that never came. She was saving children in the hospital when her entire world was bombed out of existence. “ Mama, when will this end?” Her youngest had asked her this just days before the strike . He was five . He used to draw little suns on the wall with crayons , yellow and smiling — a child who believed light could still live here. One of the child of Dr. Alaa. Dr. Alaa hadn’t answered. Because she didn’t know. She hadn’t...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Hunger Crisis in Gaza: A Deadly Cycle of Starvation, Suffering, and Refeeding Syndrome

As the siege on Gaza continues to devastate millions, the world watches as a catastrophe unfolds — one of the most heart-wrenching humanitarian crises in recent history . The simple act of eating has become a life-or-death decision for thousands of Gazans, as they struggle to survive on dwindling supplies of food and water. The situation is dire. According to recent reports from The New York Times , nearly 91% of Gaza's population is now facing “food insecurity,” with many enduring “emergency” or “catastrophic” levels of hunger. Bakeries have shut down , and charity kitchens are overcrowded as people wait for a meager meal. The UN has raised alarms that Gaza may already be on the brink of famine , with children showing the visible signs of malnutrition — emaciated bodies, hollow eyes, and weakened immune systems. But the horror doesn’t end with hunger. As Gaza’s population survives on less and less, the collapse of the healthcare system has created a terrifying new danger:...
Post a Comment
Read more

When Two Lives Matter More Than Seventy – A Night of Massacres in Gaza

When Two Lives Matter More Than Seventy On the same night that the world’s media was awash with breaking news about the tragic killing of two foreign diplomats in Washington D.C. by an American citizen—a horrific incident that drew immediate outrage, blanket media coverage, and solemn condemnations from every major capital— something else happened . In Gaza, 70 Palestinians were killed . Seventy human beings. Mothers, fathers, babies in their mother’s arms, and children huddled in fear inside a school they believed would protect them. The Fahmi al-Jarjawi School in Gaza’s Al-Daraj neighborhood was struck by Israeli warplanes. At least 36 displaced people were massacred , their bodies pulled from under the rubble, their lives extinguished without a moment’s pause. And yet, as the world grieves two diplomats, it forgets seventy Palestinians in a single night. Mainstream outlets offered wall-to-wall coverage of the Washington incident: live updates, expert panels, somber editorials....
Post a Comment
Read more

The Awakening of the Willfully Asleep: Western Media’s Sudden Gaza Epiphany

After nearly nineteen months of Israeli war crimes in Gaza—flattened hospitals, mass graves of children, obliterated families—the Western editorial boards have suddenly found their voices . Not journalists, not lone columnists, but the actual institutions . Congratulations to The Guardian , The Economist , Financial Times , and The Independent : the horror finally got too loud to ignore . Or maybe the PR risk finally outweighed the political obedience. Let’s be very clear: this isn’t conscience speaking —this is survival instinct . These media giants aren't waking up because of a sudden moral revelation ; they’re waking up because they smell something worse coming. Something catastrophic enough that silence will no longer offer plausible deniability. They know their blatant neutrality , their brutal silence , and their thinly veiled complicity will soon look monstrous under the light of historical reckoning . They're not opposing genocide because it shocks them . They’re...
Post a Comment
Read more