Skip to main content

Jabaliya Refugees Camp: From Resistance Hub to Ghost Town

 


The Haaretz article by Amos Harel, titled "Jabalya Refugee Camp, One of the World's Most Densely Populated Areas, Is Now a Ghost Town," discusses the extensive Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) operations in Jabalya aimed at dismantling Hamas. 

Key Points:

Transformation into a Ghost Town:

 Jabalya, historically significant as the cradle of the first intifada, has been heavily targeted by the IDF, resulting in widespread destruction and displacement. The camp, once densely populated, is now described as a ghost town. 

IDF Offensives:

 The article outlines multiple IDF offensives in Jabalya:

First Offensive (October 2023 - January 2024): Initiated after the October 7 attacks, involving heavy airstrikes targeting alleged Hamas command centers and tunnels, leading to significant civilian casualties and infrastructure damage.

Second Offensive (May 2024):

 A renewed ground invasion following claims of Hamas regrouping, resulting in further devastation and reports of around 70% of the camp's structures being heavily damaged. 

Third Offensive (October 2024 - Ongoing): 

Described as unprecedented in destructiveness, with entire neighborhoods leveled and intensified efforts to eradicate remaining Hamas infrastructure.

Humanitarian Impact: 

The operations have led to severe humanitarian crises, including:

Casualties and Displacement: 

Thousands killed and widespread displacement, with many residents forced to evacuate multiple times.

Infrastructure Destruction:

 Approximately 70% of buildings destroyed, leaving the camp in ruins. 

Humanitarian Aid Restrictions:

 Blockades restricting essential supplies, leading to dire conditions for the remaining population.

International Reactions: 

The article notes widespread condemnation of the IDF's actions:

Humanitarian Organizations: 

Condemnation of airstrikes and calls for accountability for attacks on civilians.

United Nations: 

Statements suggesting that the attacks could amount to war crimes due to high civilian casualties and destruction.

Regional Responses:

 Condemnations from countries including Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and Jordan, labeling the strikes as violations of international law.

Authenticity Check:

The information aligns with reports from multiple reputable sources:

Haaretz: Amos Harel's article provides detailed accounts of the IDF operations and their impact on Jabalya. 

The Guardian: Reports on the destruction of Jabalya refugee camp and the humanitarian crisis resulting from IDF operations. 

Anadolu Agency: Describes Jabalya as a ghost town with around 70% of homes and buildings destroyed due to Israel’s onslaught. 

These sources corroborate the details presented in the Haaretz article, confirming the extensive destruction in Jabalya and the severe humanitarian impact on its residents.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Rabbi Against the State: When Faith Refuses Power

In a world where identity is weaponized and religion is drafted into political armies, the sight of an ultra-Orthodox rabbi standing beside Palestinian flags unsettles nearly everyone. Yet there stands — black coat, beard, sidelocks — calmly declaring something that scrambles modern assumptions: “ Judaism is not Zionism.” For him, this is not rebellion . It is obedience . Affiliated with , a small and highly controversial Haredi sect, Rabbi Beck represents a theological current that predates modern nationalism. His argument is not secular. It is not progressive. It is not post-modern. It is ancient . And that is precisely the point. The Interview That Disturbs Categories In one widely circulated long-form interview, the exchange unfolds with almost disarming simplicity. Interviewer: Rabbi Beck, how can you oppose Israel as a Jewish rabbi? Rabbi Beck: Judaism and Zionism are two completely different things. Judaism is a religion. Zionism is a political movement founded little more ...

The High Priest of “Serious” Wars Discovers Bibi

  There was a time when rode into every Middle Eastern catastrophe like a TED Talk with a press pass. If there was a war to explain, a regime to modernize, or a “vital message” to send with cruise missiles, Tom was there — sleeves rolled up, metaphors polished. Back when the invasion of was sold as a democratic software update, Friedman wasn’t exactly storming the barricades. He was midwifing “creative destruction.” The region would be shocked into sanity. History would bend toward market reform. Fast forward. Now he’s discovered that might be bending something else entirely. When an Ex–Prime Minister Uses the Words “Ethnic Cleansing” What jolts Friedman’s latest column is not campus rhetoric. Not activist slogans. Not fringe NGOs. It’s — a former Israeli prime minister — using language that once would have detonated diplomatic careers. Olmert wrote in Haaretz that: “A violent and criminal effort is underway to ethnically cleanse territories in the West Bank.” Let...

Sanctions, Selective Morality, and the War That Never Ends

  On Feb. 28, 2026, The Editorial Board of NYTimes  warned that President Trump’s latest strike on Iran was reckless, unconstitutional, and strategically undefined. The board expressed concern for “the many innocent Iranians who have long suffered.” Eleven days earlier, on Feb. 17, 2026, wrote something even more explosive: “ Israel’s far-right government, led by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, is spitting in America’s face and telling us it’s raining. It’s not raining. Bibi is playing both President Trump and American Jews for fools.” Friedman was not questioning Israel’s right to defend itself. He was questioning whether American power was being drawn into a strategy shaped less by U.S. national interest and more by Israel’s domestic political calculus. That distinction matters. Iran as the Permanent External Threat For over four decades, Iran has been under American sanctions. Since 1979, layers of financial, oil, trade, and banking restrictions have been impo...

Blood in the Car Park: Islamophobia and the Fear That Follows Us to Prayer

  On a cold February evening in 2026, 18-year-old Zeeshan Afzal was stabbed to death in the parking lot of Oldbury Jamia Masjid, near Birmingham. He had just prayed. He had just stood shoulder to shoulder with other worshippers in Ramadan — the month of mercy, of restraint, of forgiveness. Minutes later, he lay bleeding in the dark. Police have said the investigation is ongoing and that the killing is not currently being treated as religiously motivated. That is an important and responsible clarification. Motive must be established by evidence, not emotion. And yet. Across Muslim communities in Britain and Europe, the question whispers through homes and WhatsApp groups alike: Are we safe? Even at the mosque? The Atmosphere We Cannot Ignore Even when a specific case is not officially labeled a hate crime, it unfolds within a larger social climate. And that climate matters. Across Europe, reports of anti-Muslim hate crimes have surged in recent years. Mosques vandalized....

When a Journalist Becomes a “Hybrid Threat”

  The Administrative Erasure of Hüseyin Doğru Europe prides itself on being the global capital of press freedom. And yet, in 2025, the Council of the European Union placed a German journalist under sanctions using a legal regime originally designed to counter Russian destabilisation. The journalist: The legal instrument used against him: Council Regulation (EU) 2024/2642 Concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s destabilising activities CELEX: 32024R2642 Council Decision (CFSP) 2024/2643 Restrictive measures framework (Common Foreign and Security Policy) CELEX: 32024D2643 Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/2021 (3 October 2025 – listing amendment including Doğru) CELEX: 32025R2021 These are not criminal statutes. They are foreign-policy instruments. And under them, a journalist inside the European Union was designated as supporting destabilising activities. What the Official Listing Says According to the Official Journal entry (Annex t...