Charity or Complicity?: From Holocaust Memory to Middle Eastern Injustice. A Critical Look at the EKD

Introduction and History of the Evangelical Church in Germany (EKD):

The Evangelical Church in Germany (EKD) is a federation of 20 Lutheran, Reformed, and United Protestant regional churches. It is one of the largest Christian organizations in Germany, representing approximately 19.7 million members as of recent estimates. The EKD serves as an umbrella organization rather than a centralized authority, with each regional church maintaining autonomy in governance and theology.

Historical Background:

1. Formation (1948):

The EKD was founded in 1948 in the aftermath of World War II to unify Germany’s Protestant churches, which were fragmented due to historical denominational divisions and the challenges of the Nazi era.

2. World War II and the Nazi Era:

During the Third Reich, parts of the German Protestant Church aligned with Nazi ideology, forming the "German Christians" movement. However, other groups, such as the Confessing Church, resisted Nazi interference in church affairs.

3. Post-War Reconstruction and Reconciliation:

After the war, the EKD committed itself to rebuilding Germany’s moral and spiritual foundation, addressing its role during the Holocaust, and fostering reconciliation, particularly with Jewish communities.

4. Modern Role:

Today, the EKD is actively involved in social justice, interfaith dialogue, and humanitarian efforts. It frequently addresses contemporary issues such as climate change, migration, and human rights.

Key Points from Riffat Kassis's Article in Mondoweiss:

1. Historical Context and Moral Responsibility:

The German Church, once complicit in the Holocaust, now risks complicity in what is described as Israel's genocide of Palestinians.

The Evangelical Church in Germany (EKD) prioritizes Holocaust memory and responsibility toward Jewish communities but neglects addressing Israel’s systemic injustices against Palestinians.

2. Critique of EKD’s Resolution:

The EKD passed a resolution titled “Humanitarian aid for people in the Middle East”, emphasizing compassion without addressing the root causes of suffering, such as Israel’s occupation, apartheid policies, and structural violence.

The resolution avoids acknowledging the systemic injustices fueling the humanitarian crisis in Gaza and broader Palestinian territories.

3. Risk of Selective Justice:

The EKD’s one-sided approach undermines its credibility, offering uncritical support for Israel under the guise of atonement for historical guilt.

This stance risks sidelining the plight of Palestinians and perpetuating a form of selective justice.

4. Call for Justice Beyond Charity:

Humanitarian aid is insufficient without addressing oppressive structures and advocating for a just peace.

The EKD’s silence on Israel’s violations of international law diminishes its prophetic and moral role.

5. Growing Recognition of Genocide Claims:

International bodies, including genocide scholars, Amnesty International, and religious leaders, increasingly describe Israel’s actions as genocidal.

Calls for investigations into these claims have been echoed by global figures, including the Pope and Western church leaders.

6. Contrasting Political Positions:

Even Germany’s Chancellor Olaf Scholz has joined calls for an immediate ceasefire and peace talks, demonstrating a more critical stance than the EKD.

7. Recommendations for the EKD:

To uphold its theological commitment to justice, the EKD must confront Western governments' complicit you in enabling occupation and oppression.

The church should engage with structural injustices, advocating courageously for the dignity and rights of all people to contribute meaningfully to peace and justice.

Comments

Ceasefires, Fireworks, and the Fine Art of Calling Ashes “Peace”

There is something almost poetic about declaring victory while the smoke is still rising. Not poetic in the romantic sense—more in the way a press release can be mistaken for reality if repeated often enough. So here we are. Another “ceasefire.” Another “agreement.” Another feather in the ever-expanding, never-examined peacemaking cap of Donald Trump . Israel–Iran. Israel–Hezbollah. Israel–Hamas. One could be forgiven for thinking peace has broken out everywhere—if peace meant pauses between airstrikes . The Theater of Victory On cue, Benjamin Netanyahu steps forward, flanked by ministers who speak the language of triumph as if it were immune to contradiction. “Iran weakened.” “Hezbollah contained.” “Total victory.” It all sounds remarkably similar to past declarations—just before the next round of fighting. Because here’s the inconvenient detail buried beneath the applause: none of the stated objectives were actually achieved. Iran still has its missiles. Hezboll...

The Endurance War: When Pain Becomes Strategy

There are wars fought with missiles. There are wars fought with money. And then there are wars like this one— where the real battlefield is human endurance , and the real weapon is pain tolerance . The blockade of the Strait of Hormuz is being presented as a masterstroke by —a clean, calculated move to choke Iran’s economic lifeline. But beneath the polished language of “strategic pressure” lies a far simpler, far more uncomfortable truth: This is not a test of power. It is a test of who can suffer longer. And in that contest, Washington may have chosen the wrong opponent. The Fantasy of Economic Collapse The theory is elegant: Strangle oil exports Collapse revenue Trigger unrest Force surrender It is also, historically speaking, remarkably ineffective . A major study by RAND Corporation on coercive economic strategies concluded that: “ Economic sanctions alone rarely achieve major political objectives, particularly against regimes with strong internal sec...

When a Constitution Becomes a Decorative Document America’s Latest War, and the Curious Death of Accountability

There is an imperial comedy unfolding before the world — dark enough to be tragedy, absurd enough to be satire. This is, after all, the very “model democracy” United States has spent decades promising to export to humanity — by missile, by occupation, by sanctions, by “shock and awe,” by solemn lectures on liberty delivered from polished podiums standing atop broken nations. This was the sermon preached to Iraq. Imposed on Afghanistan. Invoked amid the destruction of Libya . Entangled in the agony of Syria. Echoed through the devastation of Yemen. The doctrine was always wrapped in noble language: Rule of law. Democratic institutions. Constitutional order. Checks and balances. How magnificent those words sound — right up until power decides they are optional at home. What a remarkable export product: A democracy where Congress yields, courts hesitate, executive power expands, wars begin first and legal arguments arrive later — wrapped in flags, marketed...

The Confession Without Consequence When Empire Admits the Crime… and Funds It Anyway

There are moments in history when power accidentally tells the truth. Not because conscience triumphs. Not because morality suddenly awakens. But because the wreckage becomes too vast to keep describing as “complicated.” That moment arrived when — a pillar of Washington’s foreign policy establishment, veteran diplomat, architect of negotiations, insider to empire’s machinery — uttered words that would once have been politically unthinkable: “ Prime Minister Netanyahu has led us down a road — and we have been part of it — that has, in essence, created a genocide in Gaza that has destabilize d the Middle East.” Read that again. Not they . We. Not Israel alone . We have been part of it. That single phrase — “we have been part of it” — may be one of the most consequential admissions made by a former senior American official in modern Middle Eastern history. For decades, Washington supplied the bombs, shielded the diplomacy, vetoed accountability, framed slaughter as...

When the Readers Move Ahead of the Columnist

There is something quietly seismic happening—not in the corridors of power, not in carefully worded opinion columns, but in the comment sections beneath them. While attempts to diagnose where Israel “lost its way,” the readers seem to be asking a far more unsettling question: What if it didn’t lose its way at all? What if this is the way? For decades, the comforting narrative was simple: the problem was leadership. Replace , and the moral arc would gently correct itself. Peace would again become plausible. Restraint would return. The “real Israel” would re-emerge. But the readers are no longer convinced. They are pointing to something deeper—something less convenient. Not a deviation. A pattern. Not an exception. A structure. Because when policies persist across decades, across governments, across crises—at what point do we stop calling them mistakes and start calling them design? The Quiet Collapse of a Narrative One reader puts it bluntly: Palestinians have alr...

Ainnbeen

Search This Blog