Charity or Complicity?: From Holocaust Memory to Middle Eastern Injustice. A Critical Look at the EKD

Introduction and History of the Evangelical Church in Germany (EKD):

The Evangelical Church in Germany (EKD) is a federation of 20 Lutheran, Reformed, and United Protestant regional churches. It is one of the largest Christian organizations in Germany, representing approximately 19.7 million members as of recent estimates. The EKD serves as an umbrella organization rather than a centralized authority, with each regional church maintaining autonomy in governance and theology.

Historical Background:

1. Formation (1948):

The EKD was founded in 1948 in the aftermath of World War II to unify Germany’s Protestant churches, which were fragmented due to historical denominational divisions and the challenges of the Nazi era.

2. World War II and the Nazi Era:

During the Third Reich, parts of the German Protestant Church aligned with Nazi ideology, forming the "German Christians" movement. However, other groups, such as the Confessing Church, resisted Nazi interference in church affairs.

3. Post-War Reconstruction and Reconciliation:

After the war, the EKD committed itself to rebuilding Germany’s moral and spiritual foundation, addressing its role during the Holocaust, and fostering reconciliation, particularly with Jewish communities.

4. Modern Role:

Today, the EKD is actively involved in social justice, interfaith dialogue, and humanitarian efforts. It frequently addresses contemporary issues such as climate change, migration, and human rights.

Key Points from Riffat Kassis's Article in Mondoweiss:

1. Historical Context and Moral Responsibility:

The German Church, once complicit in the Holocaust, now risks complicity in what is described as Israel's genocide of Palestinians.

The Evangelical Church in Germany (EKD) prioritizes Holocaust memory and responsibility toward Jewish communities but neglects addressing Israel’s systemic injustices against Palestinians.

2. Critique of EKD’s Resolution:

The EKD passed a resolution titled “Humanitarian aid for people in the Middle East”, emphasizing compassion without addressing the root causes of suffering, such as Israel’s occupation, apartheid policies, and structural violence.

The resolution avoids acknowledging the systemic injustices fueling the humanitarian crisis in Gaza and broader Palestinian territories.

3. Risk of Selective Justice:

The EKD’s one-sided approach undermines its credibility, offering uncritical support for Israel under the guise of atonement for historical guilt.

This stance risks sidelining the plight of Palestinians and perpetuating a form of selective justice.

4. Call for Justice Beyond Charity:

Humanitarian aid is insufficient without addressing oppressive structures and advocating for a just peace.

The EKD’s silence on Israel’s violations of international law diminishes its prophetic and moral role.

5. Growing Recognition of Genocide Claims:

International bodies, including genocide scholars, Amnesty International, and religious leaders, increasingly describe Israel’s actions as genocidal.

Calls for investigations into these claims have been echoed by global figures, including the Pope and Western church leaders.

6. Contrasting Political Positions:

Even Germany’s Chancellor Olaf Scholz has joined calls for an immediate ceasefire and peace talks, demonstrating a more critical stance than the EKD.

7. Recommendations for the EKD:

To uphold its theological commitment to justice, the EKD must confront Western governments' complicit you in enabling occupation and oppression.

The church should engage with structural injustices, advocating courageously for the dignity and rights of all people to contribute meaningfully to peace and justice.

Comments

When Crusaders Go Digital: Old Wars, New Costumes, Same Bloodlust

History, it seems, has developed a dark sense of humor. After centuries of reflection, scholarship, and solemn declarations of “never again,” we now find elected officials—armed not with swords but with AI filters —cosplaying as Crusaders . Progress , apparently, means upgrading from iron armor to algorithmic propaganda. Let’s begin where this story actually starts—not in Washington, not in Tel Aviv, but nearly a thousand years ago, when Europe launched what it called “holy wars.” ⚔️ The Original Crusades: A Brief Reminder The Crusades (1095–1291) were not a single war but a series of campaigns initiated after Pope Urban II’s call at Clermont in 1095. His message was simple and devastatingly effective: reclaim Jerusalem, and God will reward you. What followed was not a clean clash of armies, but waves of violence that engulfed entire regions—from France and Germany through Hungary, into Byzantium, Antioch, and Palestine. Historians caution that medieval records are fragmented, but acro...

The War That Wins on Paper—and Bleeds in Reality

The War That Always Works—Until It Doesn’t There is a certain elegance to modern war. Not the destruction. Not the bodies. But the presentation . The language is always impeccable: “ Strategic degradation” “Precision targeting” “Limited objectives” It almost sounds like a policy workshop — not the opening act of something that may consume an entire region. And once again, the script is being rehearsed. Iran is “weakened.” Its systems are “degraded.” Its options are “limited.” And somewhere between these carefully chosen words, a very old idea quietly returns: Maybe this time, we finish it. Chapter One: The Seduction of Air Power Airstrikes are irresistible. They promise control without commitment. Dominance without vulnerability. Victory without presence. You can bomb a country… without ever having to meet it . No dialects to understand. No terrain to navigate. No জনগোষ্ঠী to confront. Just coordinates. And for a brief moment— it feels like war ...

Ceasefires, Fireworks, and the Fine Art of Calling Ashes “Peace”

There is something almost poetic about declaring victory while the smoke is still rising. Not poetic in the romantic sense—more in the way a press release can be mistaken for reality if repeated often enough. So here we are. Another “ceasefire.” Another “agreement.” Another feather in the ever-expanding, never-examined peacemaking cap of Donald Trump . Israel–Iran. Israel–Hezbollah. Israel–Hamas. One could be forgiven for thinking peace has broken out everywhere—if peace meant pauses between airstrikes . The Theater of Victory On cue, Benjamin Netanyahu steps forward, flanked by ministers who speak the language of triumph as if it were immune to contradiction. “Iran weakened.” “Hezbollah contained.” “Total victory.” It all sounds remarkably similar to past declarations—just before the next round of fighting. Because here’s the inconvenient detail buried beneath the applause: none of the stated objectives were actually achieved. Iran still has its missiles. Hezboll...

Morality Compass? Or a Weapon of Convenience

There is something almost poetic about the sudden rediscovery of morality in war. Not morality itself. Not restraint. But the language of it. Because today, we are told—once again—that there are limits. That civilians matter. That infrastructure must not be touched. And yet, at the very same moment, Donald Trump openly threatens to “ obliterate” Iran’s infrastructure —including electric grids and water desalination plants , the very systems that keep millions alive. Water. Electricity. The basic architecture of survival . Not hidden in classified documents. Not whispered behind closed doors. But declared—casually, publicly, almost theatrically. So let’s ask again: Where exactly is this moral compass? Because if destroying water systems—knowing it will deprive civilians of drinking water—is not crossing a line, then perhaps the line was never there. Legal experts are not confused about this. Targeting such infrastructure is widely considered prohibited under internatio...

When the System Is Questioned by Its Own Guardians. A Warning Israel Can’t Dismiss.

When the Warning Comes From Within There are moments in history when criticism from the outside can be dismissed—but when it comes from within, it becomes something far more dangerous: a mirror. That is what makes the recent letter by the The London Initiative so unsettling. Jewish philanthropists. Rabbis. Community leaders. Not critics of Israel—but voices shaped by it—now warning Isaac Herzog that something has gone terribly wrong. Their charge is stark: extremist settler violence is no longer fringe— it is becoming normalized. The Numbers That Refuse to Stay Quiet This is not rhetoric. It is data. Israeli military data (reported by Haaretz ) shows settler attacks rose by 25% in 2025 845 attacks in 2025 alone , injuring around 200 Palestinians Since October 2023: over 1,700 recorded settler attacks Early 2026: an average of 4 incidents per day And according to the United Nations and field reporting: Hundreds of Palestinians injured already in 2026 Entire ...

Ainnbeen

Search This Blog