Charity or Complicity?: From Holocaust Memory to Middle Eastern Injustice. A Critical Look at the EKD

Introduction and History of the Evangelical Church in Germany (EKD):

The Evangelical Church in Germany (EKD) is a federation of 20 Lutheran, Reformed, and United Protestant regional churches. It is one of the largest Christian organizations in Germany, representing approximately 19.7 million members as of recent estimates. The EKD serves as an umbrella organization rather than a centralized authority, with each regional church maintaining autonomy in governance and theology.

Historical Background:

1. Formation (1948):

The EKD was founded in 1948 in the aftermath of World War II to unify Germany’s Protestant churches, which were fragmented due to historical denominational divisions and the challenges of the Nazi era.

2. World War II and the Nazi Era:

During the Third Reich, parts of the German Protestant Church aligned with Nazi ideology, forming the "German Christians" movement. However, other groups, such as the Confessing Church, resisted Nazi interference in church affairs.

3. Post-War Reconstruction and Reconciliation:

After the war, the EKD committed itself to rebuilding Germany’s moral and spiritual foundation, addressing its role during the Holocaust, and fostering reconciliation, particularly with Jewish communities.

4. Modern Role:

Today, the EKD is actively involved in social justice, interfaith dialogue, and humanitarian efforts. It frequently addresses contemporary issues such as climate change, migration, and human rights.

Key Points from Riffat Kassis's Article in Mondoweiss:

1. Historical Context and Moral Responsibility:

The German Church, once complicit in the Holocaust, now risks complicity in what is described as Israel's genocide of Palestinians.

The Evangelical Church in Germany (EKD) prioritizes Holocaust memory and responsibility toward Jewish communities but neglects addressing Israel’s systemic injustices against Palestinians.

2. Critique of EKD’s Resolution:

The EKD passed a resolution titled “Humanitarian aid for people in the Middle East”, emphasizing compassion without addressing the root causes of suffering, such as Israel’s occupation, apartheid policies, and structural violence.

The resolution avoids acknowledging the systemic injustices fueling the humanitarian crisis in Gaza and broader Palestinian territories.

3. Risk of Selective Justice:

The EKD’s one-sided approach undermines its credibility, offering uncritical support for Israel under the guise of atonement for historical guilt.

This stance risks sidelining the plight of Palestinians and perpetuating a form of selective justice.

4. Call for Justice Beyond Charity:

Humanitarian aid is insufficient without addressing oppressive structures and advocating for a just peace.

The EKD’s silence on Israel’s violations of international law diminishes its prophetic and moral role.

5. Growing Recognition of Genocide Claims:

International bodies, including genocide scholars, Amnesty International, and religious leaders, increasingly describe Israel’s actions as genocidal.

Calls for investigations into these claims have been echoed by global figures, including the Pope and Western church leaders.

6. Contrasting Political Positions:

Even Germany’s Chancellor Olaf Scholz has joined calls for an immediate ceasefire and peace talks, demonstrating a more critical stance than the EKD.

7. Recommendations for the EKD:

To uphold its theological commitment to justice, the EKD must confront Western governments' complicit you in enabling occupation and oppression.

The church should engage with structural injustices, advocating courageously for the dignity and rights of all people to contribute meaningfully to peace and justice.

Comments

Dr. Randa Abdel Fattah. De-Invited by Association: When Grief Becomes a Pretext and Palestinian Identity a Liability

How Dr. Randa Abdel-Fattah Was Silenced in the Name of “Sensitivity” In a remarkable feat of moral gymnastics, Australia’s literary establishment has once again demonstrated how grief can be weaponised, principles suspended, and Palestinian identity rendered dangerously “inappropriate ” —all in the name of cultural sensitivity. Dr. Randa Abdel-Fattah , a respected author, academic, and public intellectual, was quietly de-invited from Adelaide Writers’ Week following the Bondi Junction massacre. Not because she had any connection—real, implied, or imagined—to the atrocity. Not because she endorsed violence. Not because she violated any law or ethical standard. But because, apparently, the mere presence of a Palestinian Muslim woman who speaks about justice is now considered culturally unsafe during national mourning . One wonders: unsafe for whom? The Logic of the Absurd Festival organisers were careful—almost impressively so—to state that Dr. Abdel-Fattah had nothing to do wi...

Ana Kasparian: The Voice That Won’t Be Silent — A Call for Truth in an Age of Power

Ana Kasparian is one of the most recognized and outspoken voices in contemporary political media. As a co-host of The Young Turks — a trailblazing online news and commentary program — she has spent nearly two decades dissecting U.S. politics, media, power, and foreign policy with unapologetic clarity and fierce conviction. She is not just a commentator — she is a truth-seeker who challenges power at every turn , refusing to soften her words for comfort. Schooled in journalism and political science, Ana’s commentary continues to mobilize millions, especially younger generations who feel unheard in mainstream discourse. A Voice Against the Status Quo Ana’s rhetoric can be bold, controversial, and deeply passionate — because she refuses to accept narratives that obscure the underlying truth about power and influence. On American democracy and foreign policy, she strikes at the heart of what many hesitate to articulate: “ We don’t actually live in a true democracy here in t...

Gaza and the Collapse of World Order: When the Guardian of Human Rights Sounds the Alarm

There are moments when the language of diplomacy fails, when caution becomes complicity, and when silence becomes an accomplice to destruction. On January 9, 2026, Agnès Callamard—Secretary General of Amnesty International—crossed that threshold. Her words were unambiguous, unprecedented, and devastating: The United States is destroying world order. Israel has been doing so for the last two years. Germany, through complicity and repression, is helping govern its demise. This was not activist rhetoric. It was a diagnosis from the very institution tasked with guarding the moral and legal architecture of the modern world. The Collapse of the Post-War Moral Architecture The international order that emerged after World War II was built on a promise: never again . Never again genocide. Never again collective punishment. Never again impunity for powerful states. That promise was codified in international law, human rights conventions, and multilateral institutions. But Gaza has...

Rebranding Genocide: When Killing Learns New Words

There are moments in history when crimes do not end — they simply learn new language. Gaza is living inside such a moment. The bombs have not stopped falling. The children have not stopped dying. The displaced have not stopped freezing in tents pitched atop rubble that was once their homes. What has changed is the vocabulary . And in the modern age, vocabulary is power . If you can rename atrocity, you can anesthetize conscience. First, it was called self-defense — a phrase emptied of meaning by its repetition. Then it became a war , despite the grotesque imbalance: one side armed with one of the most advanced militaries on earth, backed by the world’s most powerful empire ; the other a besieged civilian population without an army, navy, air force, tanks, or safe shelter. Now it is branded a ceasefire — a word invoked not to stop violence, but to conceal it. This is not peace. It is genocide with a quieter soundtrack. The Illusion of Restraint A slowed rate of killing is not m...

Citizens on Paper, Expendable in Practice Arab Israelis, October 7, and the Failure of International Law Inside the “Only Democracy”

Israel tells the world it is the only democracy in the Middle East . Democracies, we are reminded, protect all citizens equally—especially minorities—especially in times of crisis. Now look at Palestinian citizens of Israel , roughly 20% of the population , in the months following October 7 . Then ask: what exactly does citizenship mean when the state will not protect your life? The Forgotten Fifth of the Population Arab citizens of Israel vote. They hold passports. They pay taxes. They are citizens in the narrow, bureaucratic sense. But international law does not define citizenship by paperwork. It defines it by: Equal protection Non-discrimination The right to life Equal access to justice On those measures, Israel is not merely failing—it is structurally violating its obligations . A Murder Epidemic the State Chooses Not to Stop Long before October 7, Arab towns inside Israel were drowning in violence: Illegal weapons proliferated Organized crime flourished ...

Ainnbeen

Search This Blog