Skip to main content

Zionism as a Golden Calf, the 'False Idol': Naomi Klein’s Plea for Accountability; War, Identity, and Palestinian Rights.

Introduction of Naomi Klein 

Naomi Klein (born May 8, 1970) is a Canadian author, social activist, and filmmaker known for her political analyses; support of ecofeminism, organized labour, and criticism of corporate globalization, fascism and capitalism. In 2021, Klein took up the UBC Professorship in Climate Justice, joining the University of British Columbia's Department of Geography. She has been the co-director of the newly launched Centre for Climate Justice since 2021.

Klein first became known internationally for her alter-globalization book No Logo (1999). The Take (2004), a documentary film about Argentine workers' self-managed factories, written by her and directed by her husband Avi Lewis, further increased her profile. The Shock Doctrine (2007), a critical analysis of the history of neoliberal economics, solidified her standing as a prominent activist on the international stage and was adapted into a six-minute companion film by Alfonso and Jonás Cuarón, as well as a feature-length documentary by Michael Winterbottom. Klein's This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. the Climate (2014) was a New York Times nonfiction bestseller and the winner of the Hilary Weston Writers' Trust Prize for Nonfiction.

In 2016, Klein was awarded the Sydney Peace Prize for her activism on climate justice. Klein frequently appears on global and national lists of top influential thinkers, including the 2014 Thought Leaders ranking compiled by the Gottlieb Duttweiler Institute, Prospect magazine's world thinkers 2014 poll, and Maclean's 2014 Power List.

Key points from Naomi Klein's critique of Zionism, with further explanations and context on how her arguments intersect with the ongoing Gaza conflict and broader Israeli-Palestinian issues.

1. Zionism as a "False Idol":

Klein argues that Zionism, in its contemporary form, has diverged from foundational Jewish values, like justice and community, and has become what she calls a “false idol.” She uses the metaphor of the Israelites worshiping a golden calf to describe how she believes Zionism has become a replacement for true ethical principles in Jewish tradition.

         Naomi Klein 

According to Klein, this "idol" distorts a concept that was initially about cultural and religious liberation into a justification for a militarized ethnostate. In her view, this form of Zionism sanctions actions that include violence against Palestinians and the expansion of Israeli territories at the cost of Palestinian lives and rights.

2. Distortion of Jewish Values:

Klein argues that modern Zionism contradicts core Jewish commandments such as “Thou shalt not kill” and “Thou shalt not covet.” She views current policies toward Palestinians as incompatible with these ethical values. She contends that militarized Zionism dehumanizes Palestinians, seeing them less as individuals with equal rights and more as demographic or security threats. Klein emphasizes that these actions harm not only Palestinians but also distort the moral fabric of Jewish communities around the world.

3. Criticism of Holocaust Analogies:

Klein is critical of analogies made between contemporary Israeli experiences and the Holocaust. She finds these comparisons inappropriate, especially when used to frame Palestinians as existential threats similar to historical oppressors of Jews.

In her view, this narrative intensifies anti-Palestinian sentiment by conflating the trauma of Jewish history with modern-day conflicts, leading to a justifying framework for aggressive military policies in Gaza and beyond. This approach, she suggests, positions Palestinians as a perpetual enemy, enabling policies that escalate violence and further displacement.

4. Concerns over "Scholasticide" and Cultural Erasure:

Klein highlights what some activists term “scholasticide”the systematic targeting of educational institutions, including universities and schools in Gaza, as a way to diminish Palestinian identity, history, and intellectual resources. By destroying these educational infrastructures, Klein believes Israel erodes Palestinian means of cultural and intellectual survival. This attack on educational sites, she argues, amounts to an attempt at erasing Palestinian history and cultural expression, thereby perpetuating a form of colonial suppression.

5. Advocacy for the BDS Movement:

Klein strongly advocates for international intervention through the Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) movement. She believes that BDS, which aims to apply economic and political pressure on Israel to comply with international law, is one of the few viable strategies for holding Israel accountable.

Klein argues that due to the political climate within Israel and its close alliances, internal reform may be unlikely. Therefore, she suggests that outside pressure through BDS and similar campaigns is crucial to push for a re-evaluation of Israeli policies regarding Palestine.

6. Vision of a Broader, Inclusive Judaism:

Klein envisions Judaism as an inclusive, internationalist tradition that transcends the boundaries of a militarized ethnostate. She calls for a re-emphasis on Jewish values that advocate for universal justice and human rights, rather than nationalism. For Klein, reclaiming these values means supporting Palestinian rights and opposing Zionist nationalism that, in her view, has led Israel away from ethical and spiritual foundations.

Klein’s perspective has sparked significant debate within Jewish and Israeli communities, highlighting divisions over how Jewish identity, historical trauma, and national policy intersect with ethics, social justice, and international law. Her advocacy for BDS and critique of Zionism have made her a prominent voice among progressive Jewish activists and critics of Israeli policies.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

UBS SHARES FELL AFTER A REPORT OF COMPLIANCE FAILURE AMID RUSSIAN CLIENTS

https://drive.google.com/file/d/18EvHeQCCcRJJPEaonc8pby64KA6fD0Xh/view?usp=drivesdk   "ZURICH, Sept 27 (Reuters) - UBS shares fell on Wednesday after a report that the U.S. Department of Justice has stepped up scrutiny into alleged compliance failures that helped Russian clients evade sanctions . UBS declined to comment to Reuters when asked for a response to the Bloomberg News report, which said the alleged compliance failures related to UBS and Credit Suisse, which was taken over by its larger rival UBS  (UBSG.S)  earlier this year." " Trading in UBS shares was temporarily  halted  after they fell nearly 8% following the report. The Swiss bank's shares later recovered to trade 3.3% lower at 1500 GMT." SOURCE: https://www.reuters.com/business/finance/ubs-credit-suisse-face-wider-us-probe-over-russia-sanctions-bloomberg-news-2023-09-27/

" Israel Will Collapse Within a Year if the War of Attrition Against Hamas and Hezbollah Continues" Detailed overview of Haaretz's article by Retired Israeli General, Yitzhak Brik

( Yitzhak Brik is an Israeli IDF General (reserve). He served in the Armored Corps as a brigade , division and troops commander and served as the commander of the IDF military colleges . He fought as a reserve company commander in the Yom Kippur War and was decorated with the Medal of Courage.)   A detailed overview of Haaretz's article by Yitzhak Brik " Israel Will Collapse Within a Year if the War of Attrition Against Hamas and Hezbollah Continues" In Yitzhak Brik's Haaretz opinion piece titled " Israel Will Collapse Within a Year if the War of Attrition Against Hamas and Hezbollah Continues, " the retired general expresses his deep concern about the ongoing conflict's impact on Israel. He argues that the prolonged war of attrition with Hamas and Hezbollah , if continued , will lead to Israel's collapse within a year. Brik highlights several key issues, including: 1. Military Stalemate:  Brik criticizes Israel's military lead

IMEC. LACKS LOGICAL JUSTIFICATION.

 "Critics argue that India’s new corridor lacks logical justification. India opting for a rail and shipping corridor when the existing and cheaper Suez Canal and maritime routes are available does not make sense . Secondly, building railways through desert terrain requires elevated tracks with deep support to withstand shifting sands and hard bedrock. The political landscape in the US adds another layer of uncertainty, as opposition to investment in this corridor could increase if the Biden administration loses power. The Republicans, on the other hand, would oppose putting money into a failing project just like they did not want to put money into the Ukraine war. On the other hand, the US and India have previously announced initiatives like the Chabahar Corridor, the International North-South Corridor and the US Blue Dot Network, but the status of these projects remains uncertain." "...Moreover, IMEC passes through Jordan and Israel, introducing complex geopolitical ch