Meet Bibi Netanyahu's Refusenik Nephew Who Says That Israel Is an Apartheid State

"JH: You’ve written a piece in the Christian Science Monitor.You wrote, “If Americans truly are our friends, they would shake us up and take away the keys. Because right now we are driving drunk. And without this wakeup call we will soon find ourselves in the ditch of an undemocratic, doomed state.”

Can you unpack that for us? What do you think the American government should be doing in terms of trying to advance a real peace in this region?

JBA: There’s a hidden assumption in your question. When you say, "What should the American government be doing to promote peace?" you’re assuming the American government wants peace.

Among liberals who give a lot of thought to American and Middle East issues there are two competing views. There are some, like Chomsky, who would say that the US is the dominant power, and within that there are various interests, like corporations. Any other player around the world basically does what the US bids them to do.

There’s this competing view which is at least primarily raised by two professors from Chicago and Harvard [Steven Walt and John Mearsheimer]. It’s about the Israel lobby, and it holds that Israel has a lot of control over US politics. I lean more towards the Chomsky point of view. In that sense I’m taking back some of the things I actually wrote, because I think that a lot of what Israel does is with the consent and pushing of the US.

The US is fully complicit in everything. What I still think holds is that the American population has a lot of influence, but they don’t know many things. The American population has it in their interests to have good health insurance, or to have a controlled Wall Street. That is not happening, because that’s the way the political system is designed."
SOURCE: http://www.alternet.org/world/meet-bibi-netanyahus-refusenik-nephew-who-says-israel-apartheid-state

Comments

Ceasefires, Fireworks, and the Fine Art of Calling Ashes “Peace”

There is something almost poetic about declaring victory while the smoke is still rising. Not poetic in the romantic sense—more in the way a press release can be mistaken for reality if repeated often enough. So here we are. Another “ceasefire.” Another “agreement.” Another feather in the ever-expanding, never-examined peacemaking cap of Donald Trump . Israel–Iran. Israel–Hezbollah. Israel–Hamas. One could be forgiven for thinking peace has broken out everywhere—if peace meant pauses between airstrikes . The Theater of Victory On cue, Benjamin Netanyahu steps forward, flanked by ministers who speak the language of triumph as if it were immune to contradiction. “Iran weakened.” “Hezbollah contained.” “Total victory.” It all sounds remarkably similar to past declarations—just before the next round of fighting. Because here’s the inconvenient detail buried beneath the applause: none of the stated objectives were actually achieved. Iran still has its missiles. Hezboll...

The Endurance War: When Pain Becomes Strategy

There are wars fought with missiles. There are wars fought with money. And then there are wars like this one— where the real battlefield is human endurance , and the real weapon is pain tolerance . The blockade of the Strait of Hormuz is being presented as a masterstroke by —a clean, calculated move to choke Iran’s economic lifeline. But beneath the polished language of “strategic pressure” lies a far simpler, far more uncomfortable truth: This is not a test of power. It is a test of who can suffer longer. And in that contest, Washington may have chosen the wrong opponent. The Fantasy of Economic Collapse The theory is elegant: Strangle oil exports Collapse revenue Trigger unrest Force surrender It is also, historically speaking, remarkably ineffective . A major study by RAND Corporation on coercive economic strategies concluded that: “ Economic sanctions alone rarely achieve major political objectives, particularly against regimes with strong internal sec...

Israel's War Without Strategy: The Biography of a Failure Repeating Itself

There are wars fought for survival. There are wars fought for power. And then there are wars fought to avoid answering a question. Israel today appears to be fighting the third kind. October 7: The Disaster That Required Questions — And Got None On October 07, atteck , the unthinkable happened. Not just a breach. A collapse. The kind that doesn’t happen because of one missed signal—but because an entire system stops asking the right questions. So naturally, the next step should have been: 👉 A ruthless, transparent, national inquiry 👉 Political accountability at the highest level 👉 Institutional introspection Instead, the system chose a far more innovative response: Move on. Quickly. Loudly. Violently. Because nothing says “we’re learning” like launching a war before finishing the autopsy. And Then… The Same Movie Played Again Fast forward. Hezbollah was declared “finished,” “on its knees,” “neutralized.” Victory speeches were practically warming up in the...

Losing the Public: Israel’s Iran War Faces a Crisis at Home

🧭 Core Argument Scheindlin’s central point is simple but powerful: 👉 Public support for the Iran war in Israel is already declining—much faster than expected. And more importantly: 👉 This war is not giving the political boost that wars usually give leaders. 📉 1. Rapid Decline in Public Support In most wars, there’s an initial “ rally around the flag” effect . But in this case, support started dropping within weeks , not months. Why? Israelis are seeing: No clear victory path High risks of escalation Uncertain objectives 👉 This creates early fatigue , not long-term unity. ⚠️ 2. Lack of Clear Strategic Goal Scheindlin highlights a key issue: 👉 People don’t understand what “ winning ” looks like. Is the goal: Destroy Iran’s nuclear program? Deter Iran regionally? Regime change? Without clarity: Public confidence erodes Skepticism replaces patriotism 🔥 3. Fear of Regional Escalation The war is not seen as contained. Israelis fear: Hezbo...

When a Constitution Becomes a Decorative Document America’s Latest War, and the Curious Death of Accountability

There is an imperial comedy unfolding before the world — dark enough to be tragedy, absurd enough to be satire. This is, after all, the very “model democracy” United States has spent decades promising to export to humanity — by missile, by occupation, by sanctions, by “shock and awe,” by solemn lectures on liberty delivered from polished podiums standing atop broken nations. This was the sermon preached to Iraq. Imposed on Afghanistan. Invoked amid the destruction of Libya . Entangled in the agony of Syria. Echoed through the devastation of Yemen. The doctrine was always wrapped in noble language: Rule of law. Democratic institutions. Constitutional order. Checks and balances. How magnificent those words sound — right up until power decides they are optional at home. What a remarkable export product: A democracy where Congress yields, courts hesitate, executive power expands, wars begin first and legal arguments arrive later — wrapped in flags, marketed...

Ainnbeen

Search This Blog