Skip to main content

" Netanyahu's Judicial Coup: Government Passes Bill for Political Takeover of Judicial Appointments" Haaretz. Key Points.

 


The bill is a key part of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's controversial judicial overhaul plan, which has sparked massive protests and deep political divisions in Israel. Here’s a detailed overview of its provisions, implications, and context:


Key Provisions of the Bill

The legislation alters the composition and functioning of the Judicial Appointments Committee, the body responsible for selecting judges in Israel, including Supreme Court justices.  


1. Politicization of Judicial Appointments:  

   - Previously, the nine-member committee included a mix of politicians, judges, and legal professionals, requiring broad consensus for appointments.  

   - The new law changes the balance, giving the governing coalition a de facto majority (7 out of 13 members, after a future expansion) in selecting judges.  

   - The committee will now include:  

     - 3 government ministers (up from 2).  

     - 3 coalition-backed Knesset members (instead of 2, with one traditionally from the opposition).  

     - The Supreme Court president and two other justices (reduced influence).  

     - 2 representatives from the Israel Bar Association (whose role may be weakened in future reforms).  


2. Elimination of Checks and Balances:  

   - The previous system required at least one opposition MK and cooperation between branches of government.  

   - Now, the coalition can push through judicial appointments without opposition or judicial input.  


3. Future Implications for the Supreme Court:  

   - The government could stack the courts with ideologically aligned judges, including the Supreme Court, which has often acted as a check on government power.  

   - Critics warn this could lead to erosion of judicial independence and enable authoritarian policies.  


Why It’s Controversial  

- Power Grab: Opponents argue it undermines democracy by letting politicians control judicial appointments, removing a key check on government power.  

- Part of a Larger Overhaul: This is just one piece of Netanyahu’s broader plan, which includes weakening the Supreme Court’s power to strike down laws (override clause) and reducing judicial review.  

- Protests & Opposition: The reform has triggered months of mass protests, with military reservists, business leaders, and legal experts warning of democratic backsliding.  

- International Concerns: The U.S. and EU have expressed worries about Israel’s democratic stability.  


Netanyahu’s Justification 

- Supporters argue the reforms "restore democracy" by reducing what they see as an overly activist Supreme Court.  

- They claim judges have too much power and are unelected, while the elected government should have more influence.  


What’s Next? 

- The opposition may challenge the law in the Supreme Court, leading to a constitutional crisis if the Court strikes it down and the government refuses to comply.  

- Further reforms are expected, including laws to limit judicial review and weaken the attorney general’s authority.  


This marks a historic shift in Israel’s governance, moving toward greater political control over the judiciary—a move critics compare to Hungary and Poland’s democratic erosion.  


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Delivering the Dead: How the World Watches Gaza Bleed.

  Delivering the Dead: How the World Watches Gaza Bleed “ I delivered a beheaded woman who was nine months pregnant. ” That’s not a horror-film script. That’s not medieval history. That is the testimony of an Australian medic standing in a Gaza hospital in 2025, describing what it means to “ practice medicine ” under Israeli bombardment. A nine-months-pregnant woman , decapitated , her body torn open so that the child she carried could be pulled out lifeless — and somehow this is still not enough to shake the comfortable democracies of the West into anything resembling a conscience. We should probably give the Nobel Prize for Creative Euphemism to the politicians who still call this “self-defense.” After all, there’s nothing quite as defensive as severing the head of an expectant mother and forcing foreign doctors to deliver her dead child in the rubble of what used to be a hospital . Bravo, civilization . The tragedy is not just the atrocity itself. It’s the smug perfo...

Britain’s Recognition of Palestine: A Century of Complicity in Disguise.

So we’ve reached this moment: Keir Starmer’s UK “ recognises the State of Palestine. ” Applause lines up. Speeches made. Headlines dazzled. But behind the pomp, the guns, the exports, the intelligence, the training — history rings out in mocking laughter. Because Britain has been complicit since day one. This recognition is not redemption . It’s theatre. 1. The Original Sin: Balfour Declaration Let’s go back. Because if you don’t know your history, you’ll be fooled by the future. On 2 November 1917 , Arthur James Balfour (Britain’s Foreign Secretary) wrote to Lord Rothschild, and officially declared: “His Majesty’s Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object , it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine , or the rights and political sta...

Gaza’s Medical Apocalypse: Numbers, Neglect, and the Farce of “Access”

  If you ever needed proof that statistics can be more damning than bombs, look at Gaza’s health crisis . Behind the headlines and hashtags lies a cascade of bodies and broken systems. We have numbers, we have reports, we have PDFs— and yet the world stares, unmoved, at the collapse. Below is your ruthless, numbers-soaked guide to the suffering —and the institutional failure—behind Gaza’s medical implosion . 1. The Health System Is Already Dead. We’re Just Counting the Corpse. According to WHO, “The Gaza Strip faces an unprecedented humanitarian crisis with rising mortality and widespread displacement.” Between 1 January and 31 August 2024 , local health authorities reported 18,900 deaths and 38,916 injuries . Women, children, and the elderly account for over 50 % of fatal casualties . More than 53 % of Gaza’s 36 hospitals were non-functional as of August 2024, and many of the partially functioning ones lacked adequate water or relied entirely on fuel generators. ...

The Ceasefire of Exhaustion: When Empires Collapse from Within

  By Malik Mukhtar — ainnbeen.blogspot.com Two years after Gaza was first set on fire , the war that began with biblical vengeance has stumbled to an exhausted ceasefire . On October 9, 2025 , Israel and Hamas — after endless carnage, famine, and rubble — have signed the first phase of a ceasefire agreement mediated in Sharm el-Sheikh . Trump called it a “ historic peace plan. ” History may call it a truce of attrition — a war that collapsed under the weight of its own hubris. What the Ceasefire Says — and What It Doesn’t Under the agreement, Israeli forces are to pull back to a designated “yellow line” within 24 hours of cabinet ratification. Hamas, in turn, will release all remaining hostages — alive or dead — within 72 hours after the withdrawal. Israel will free about 2,000 Palestinian prisoners, though it made sure to exclude political figures like Marwan Barghouti , whose freedom would remind the world that Palestine still breathes. Humanitarian convoys — food,...

The End of Zionism? Welcome to the Funeral Nobody Wants to Admit Is Overdue

  Of course. Haaretz recently published an opinion piece by Ithamar Handelman -Smith titled “ Some Say It’s the End of Zionism, and I Say That’s All Right .” And what impeccable timing: as Israel carries out a near-two-year campaign of siege, famine, and bombardment in Gaza — slaughtering families, burying aid workers with their ambulances, and literally starving children to death — someone in Israel finally whispers the unspeakable: maybe Zionism, that 20th-century project of “ Jewish salvation ,” has outlived its moral shelf life. Bravo. The house is burning, bodies are scattered in the street, and the philosopher shows up with a garden hose . Zionism: Success Story or Crime Scene? Handelman-Smith argues that Zionism achieved its success : a Jewish state, a safe haven, a fortress against the ghosts of Europe’s crimes . But like every “ success story ” drenched in other people’s blood , it didn’t age well. What began as refuge turned into domination; what was called “ ...