Skip to main content

Technofeudalism: What killed Capitalism. Interview with Yanis Varoufakis. Chris Hedges Report.

  


Introduction of Yanis Varoufakis. 

              Yanis Varoufakis 

Yanis Varoufakis is a Greek economist, academic, and politician known for his critiques of global capitalism and his tenure as Greece’s Finance Minister during the 2015 debt crisis. Born in 1961, he has taught at various universities worldwide and is a prolific author on economics and political theory. Varoufakis gained international recognition for his opposition to austerity measures imposed by the European Union and the International Monetary Fund. He co-founded the pan-European political movement DiEM25 and has written several influential books, including Technofeudalism: What Killed Capitalism and Adults in the Room, which details his experience negotiating Greece’s debt crisis.


Key points from interview by Chris Hedges with Yanis Varoufakis:

1. The 2008 Financial Crisis and the Rise of "Cloud Capital"

The financial crisis of 2008 exposed the instability of modern capitalism, particularly due to the unregulated financial sector.

Investment banks, described as “vampire squids” by journalist Matt Taibbi, were bailed out with government money—socialism for the banks but not for the people.

Instead of benefiting the masses, bailout money was used for stock buybacks, increasing wealth concentration.

A new economic power bloc emerged, including figures like Jeff Bezos and corporations like Microsoft and Google.

This marked the beginning of what Varoufakis calls cloud capitala new form of capital ownership based on digital platforms rather than traditional industries.


2. Technofeudalism: Capitalism Has Been Replaced

Yanis Varoufakis argues that capitalism is no longer the dominant economic system.

The two pillars of capitalism—markets and profit—have been replaced.

Digital platforms like Amazon and Alibaba have created closed ecosystems or "digital fiefdoms" where all value is generated and controlled by platform owners.

Instead of profits from selling goods, these companies extract cloud renta fee for accessing and using their digital infrastructure.


3. Digital Platforms as Feudal Fiefdoms

Unlike traditional markets where businesses compete, digital platforms act as monopolistic landlords.

Users—including consumers, businesses, and creators—are locked into these platforms, much like feudal serfs working on a lord’s land.

Amazon, Google, and similar platforms dictate the rules, control prices, and extract value from users in a one-sided relationship.

The power of these platforms is reinforced through data collection and behavioral manipulation.


4. Behavioral Modification: The Power of AI and Algorithms

Platforms like Instagram, Google, and Amazon use advanced AI to modify human behavior.

Algorithms learn user preferences through engagement and use that data to shape future choices, creating a feedback loop.

This AI-driven influence is more powerful than traditional advertising, as it subtly implants desires and habits into users.

Example: Amazon’s recommendation system doesn’t just predict what users wantit actively shapes their desires.


5. The Role of Private Equity and Rentier Capitalism

Traditional capitalism depended on competition, investment, and production, but today’s economy is dominated by rentier capitalism.

Large investment firms like BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street accumulate power by buying up traditional businesses and assets, making them dependent on digital monopolies.

This system eliminates competition, making it harder for small businesses or traditional capitalists to survive.


6. Economic and Political Consequences of Technofeudalism

The shift toward cloud capital affects wages, jobs, and economic stability.

In traditional industries, 80% of revenue went to wages, but in tech companies like Facebook, only 1% goes to wages.

The rest is extracted as digital rent, funneled through tax havens, worsening income inequality.

This dynamic depresses aggregate demand, forcing central banks like the Federal Reserve to intervene by printing more money, leading to financial instability.

The U.S. and China dominate this cloud capital system, increasing geopolitical tensions over digital infrastructure and AI.


7. The Impact on Workers and Traditional Capitalists

Even in traditional industries like manufacturing, workers are controlled by AI-driven surveillance systems.

Amazon warehouse workers, for example, are tracked by wearable devices that dictate their every move and even predict potential union activity.

Workers are deprived of autonomy and are increasingly treated as replaceable, reinforcing economic inequality.

Small businesses and old capitalist firms struggle to compete with digital monopolies that have near-unlimited resources.


8. The Future Under Technofeudalism

The transition from capitalism to technofeudalism has fundamentally changed economic power structures.

Unlike capitalism, which had mechanisms for competition and social mobility, technofeudalism concentrates power in a few dominant platforms.

Governments struggle to regulate these platforms because they transcend national borders and wield immense economic influence.

This new system threatens democracy, autonomy, and personal freedoms as economic power becomes hyper-centralized.


9. Automation and the Decline of Traditional Manufacturing Jobs

Rise of Robotics in Manufacturing: Companies like Boeing and car manufacturers have largely automated production, reducing the need for human labor.

Impact on Employment: Jobs that once employed thousands are now being replaced by machines, leading to structural unemployment in traditional manufacturing sectors.

Gig Economy Parallel: Similar to how factory work is being automated, other labor markets are being fragmented through platforms like Amazon’s Mechanical Turk, which turn workers into independent contractors without benefits.


10. Tesla and BYD as "Cloud Capital" Vehicles

Cars as Data Collection Machines: Tesla and BYD vehicles function like “iPads on wheels,” collecting vast amounts of user data (driving patterns, music preferences, shopping habits, etc.).

Cloud Capitalization: Tesla’s market value surged post-2016, reflecting the power of data-driven business models over traditional car manufacturers.

Remote Control by Tesla: Tesla retains control over its vehicles via cloud connectivity, allowing the company to disable a car remotely, as seen in cases where second-hand buyers refused Tesla servicing.

Monetization of User Behavior: Beyond selling cars, Tesla profits from user-generated data, similar to how Alexa or Google Assistant collects and monetizes consumer information.


11. The Transformation of Labor in the Cloud Capital Era

Shift from Wage Labor to Gig Work: Jobs that can be automated are increasingly removed from traditional employment structures, replacing secure wages with per-task payments (e.g., Amazon’s Mechanical Turk).

Lack of Worker Protections: Gig workers lack social security, healthcare, or labor rights, often being paid in company-specific tokens rather than real wages—similar to historical company scrip used in mining towns.

Experiential Labor as a Last Stronghold: Creative and collaborative work (e.g., architecture, high-level advertising, brainstorming) remains harder to automate, as it requires human insight and innovation.


12. The Decline of Traditional Advertising and the Rise of AI-Driven Marketing

From "Mad Men" to AI-Driven Ads: Classic advertising, as seen in the TV show Mad Men, relied on human creativity. Today, AI-driven algorithms customize ads in real time based on user data.

Targeted Marketing via Cloud Capital: Unlike Don Draper’s mass-market campaigns, AI now personalizes advertising to individuals based on their habits and moods, making traditional advertising agencies less relevant.

Corporations Losing Power to Tech Giants: Legacy corporations like Coca-Cola and General Motors are becoming less influential in stock markets compared to cloud capital firms like Tesla, Google, Amazon, and Palantir.


13. The Rise of Technofeudalism

Power Shift from Industrial to Cloud Capital: Companies that own cloud capital (Tesla, Amazon, Google, etc.) dominate the economy, while traditional manufacturing companies lose their influence.

Palantir vs. Lockheed Martin as an Example: AI-driven war technology (Palantir) now holds higher stock market value than legacy military-industrial firms (Lockheed Martin), signaling a shift in economic and geopolitical power.

Workers as "Cloud Serfs": People no longer just work for companies; they generate valuable data for free while using digital services, effectively making them unpaid laborers for cloud capital owners.

This conversation highlights how automation, cloud capital, and AI-driven economies are reshaping labor, corporate power, and society itself. 


14. The Concentration of Corporate Ownership

Varoufakis highlights that three major financial firms—BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard—collectively control over 80% of the companies listed on the New York Stock Exchange.

This does not mean majority ownership, but owning 15% in a large corporation is enough to exert control.

Implication: Traditional capitalist competition is significantly weakened because many major corporations—such as airlines, media companies, and retail chains—are owned by the same few entities.

Effect on Competition: If two competing airlines are owned by the same investment firm, they have no incentive to truly compete; instead, they can engage in price-fixing and market manipulation.

Shift in Profitability: Traditional capitalist profits, derived from innovation and competition, are being replaced by rent-seeking behaviors—where large firms extract money without contributing to productivity.


15. The Role of Private Equity and the Shift to Rent-Seeking

Private equity firms now acquire essential services (utilities, healthcare, education, etc.) and restructure them to extract maximum financial gains.

How it Works:

A firm buys a company (e.g., a public utility, a school, or a hospital) and splits it into two entities:


16. One company owns the physical assets (buildings, land).


17. Another company manages workers and customers.

The second company (workers/customers) is forced to pay rent to the first, inflating costs artificially.

The asset-owning company takes on large debt, and the investors pocket the money before eventually bankrupting the entire operation.

Result: Public services and businesses are turned into short-term profit schemes, destroying long-term sustainability.


18. The End of Capitalism as We Know It

Traditional capitalism relied on market competition, innovation, and productivity.

Now, what Varoufakis calls "technofeudalism" has taken over:

A small elite extracts wealth through cloud capital and financialization rather than actual production.

The state actively supports this system by allowing monopolization and corporate bailouts.

Capitalism is no longer a free market; it is a form of digital feudalism where a handful of firms control the economy.


19. The Left’s Abandonment of Freedom

Historically, the left was about liberation, focusing on:

Liberating workers from capitalist exploitation.

Feminist and civil rights movements pushing for actual empowerment.

Over time, the left split:

In the East (USSR, China, etc.): Leftist movements abandoned freedom in favor of centralized economic control—leading to authoritarianism.

In the West (Europe, U.S.): Leftist movements abandoned freedom in favor of "fairness"—redistributing wealth but accepting the capitalist system.

This shift allowed libertarians to hijack the concept of freedom, reframing it as the freedom of corporations to dominate.


20. Parallels Between Soviet Planning and Amazon’s Algorithm

The Soviet Union’s Gosplan (central economic planning system) aimed to allocate resources and match supply to demand.

In today's economy, Amazon’s algorithm plays the same role, but:

It is not optimizing for society's needs, but rather for Jeff Bezos' profits.

The Soviet system failed due to inefficiency, while Amazon’s system works because of advanced technology.

Core Similarity: Both represent top-down control over economic activity, replacing decentralized market competition.


21. The Future of the Left: Reclaiming Freedom

Varoufakis argues that the left must return to its roots in liberation rather than just focusing on redistribution.

This means:

Resisting corporate monopolies and technofeudalism.

Ensuring workers regain control over their workplaces.

Challenging the idea that corporate control equals freedom.

Without this shift, big tech and financial monopolies will continue to consolidate power, leaving little room for democracy or real competition.


22. Loss of Individual Autonomy in the Digital Age

Ownership of Digital Identity:

Our digital identity is fragmented across multiple private entities (banks, social media platforms, tech corporations).

Personal data is constantly monitored, analyzed, and commodified by corporations without user control.

The shift means individuals no longer own or control their own personal information.

The Decline of the "Liberal Individual":

Traditional economic theory posits a sovereign individual making rational choices.

With AI, algorithms, and digital tracking, personal preferences are shaped externally by tech companies rather than being self-determined.

Individuals engage in a continuous feedback loop with digital systems that influence their thoughts, choices, and consumption habits.

The Merging of Work and Leisure:

In traditional capitalism, work and leisure were separate—people worked for wages and then had autonomous personal time.

With the rise of cloud capitalism, personal and professional life are blurred (e.g., social media self-curation for job prospects).

This results in subconscious self-monitoring, creating stress and anxiety over digital presence and future employment opportunities.


23. The Transformation of Capitalism Post-2008

Financial Crisis and the Role of Central Banks:

Before 2008, Wall Street and global finance created speculative financial products (derivatives, CDOs, etc.), leading to economic instability.

Governments bailed out financial institutions, effectively socializing losses while imposing austerity on ordinary citizens.

This resulted in a wealth transfer where public funds sustained private financial institutions, reinforcing oligarchic control.

Rise of "Cloud Capitalism":

Unlike traditional capitalism, where industrialists invested in production, tech giants like Amazon, Google, and Meta reinvested in digital infrastructure (cloud computing, AI).

Nine out of every ten dollars invested in cloud capital came from money printed by central banks.

Unlike traditional businesses that rely on profits, cloud capitalists extract rent through monopolistic control over digital spaces, user data, and online commerce.


24. The Power Shift from Financial Capitalism to "Cloud Feudalism"

The New Economic Rulers:

The new ruling class—"cloudalists"—are not traditional bankers but tech and data monopolists (Amazon, Google, Microsoft, Meta).

These corporations do not necessarily need to generate profits; they function by collecting rents from digital infrastructures.

They control the economy not by producing goods but by monopolizing data, online marketplaces, and digital interaction spaces.

Historical Comparison to Feudalism:

In medieval feudalism, peasants worked land they did not own, paying tribute to lords.

Today, individuals work on digital platforms (social media, e-commerce, gig work) without owning the data or benefiting from their labor.

Power is concentrated among an ultra-elite who dictate access to digital services, much like feudal lords controlled land and resources.


25. The Collapse of Traditional Economic Theories

U.S. Trade Deficit and Global Capital Flow:

Historically, trade deficits weakened empires, but the U.S. has maintained hegemony by running massive deficits.

The mechanism: U.S. imports goods from other nations, and those nations reinvest dollars into Wall Street and U.S. assets.

This created a financialized economy where the U.S. exported debt and received capital in return, fueling speculative investments.

Stock Buybacks Instead of Productive Investment:

Traditional manufacturing companies (e.g., Volkswagen, General Electric) received cheap money from central banks but didn’t invest in production due to declining consumer purchasing power.

Instead, they used funds to buy back their own stocks, inflating share prices without increasing real economic activity.


26. Strategies for Resistance and Reclaiming Autonomy

Digital Public Infrastructure as a Counterforce:

Governments and communities should create alternative digital infrastructures to bypass corporate control.

Example: In Greece, Varoufakis proposed a parallel digital payment system linked to tax accounts to counter the European Central Bank’s financial restrictions.

Such systems could allow people to engage in transactions without reliance on commercial banks.

New Forms of Collective Action:

Traditional labor strikes need to be combined with consumer boycotts and digital financial activism.

Example: If workers strike at Amazon, customers should simultaneously refuse to buy products to weaken financial leverage.

Additionally, financial experts could analyze corporate debt structures to target economic vulnerabilities of monopolistic corporations.

Reclaiming Cloud Capital:

Instead of destroying technology, progressive movements should take control of digital infrastructure to democratize access.

This requires organizing tech workers, financial analysts, and digital activists to challenge corporate monopolies from within.


Conclusion: 

A Call for Awareness and Action

Varoufakis’ critique of technofeudalism is a stark warning about the trajectory of the global economy. The digital revolution, once hailed as a force for democratization and economic empowerment, has instead concentrated power in the hands of a few corporate giants. The shift from capitalism to a digital feudal order has left individuals increasingly dependent on platform-controlled ecosystems, eroding both economic and personal freedoms.

Without intervention, this transformation will only deepen, further entrenching monopolistic control and widening inequalities. Societies must acknowledge this shift and take decisive action to curb the unchecked power of digital monopolies. Regulation alone is not enough—there must also be a fundamental rethinking of economic structures that prioritize individual autonomy over corporate dominance.

Varoufakis calls for a new form of resistance, one that leverages digital tools to create decentralized and democratic alternatives. Rather than merely redistributing wealth, the focus must be on dismantling the systems of control that cloud capitalists have built. The battle against technofeudalism is not just about economic justice but about reclaiming the power to shape our own futures. If left unchallenged, the digital economy will continue its transformation into a neo-feudal order—one where a few corporate overlords dictate the terms of economic and social life for the many.








Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Delivering the Dead: How the World Watches Gaza Bleed.

  Delivering the Dead: How the World Watches Gaza Bleed “ I delivered a beheaded woman who was nine months pregnant. ” That’s not a horror-film script. That’s not medieval history. That is the testimony of an Australian medic standing in a Gaza hospital in 2025, describing what it means to “ practice medicine ” under Israeli bombardment. A nine-months-pregnant woman , decapitated , her body torn open so that the child she carried could be pulled out lifeless — and somehow this is still not enough to shake the comfortable democracies of the West into anything resembling a conscience. We should probably give the Nobel Prize for Creative Euphemism to the politicians who still call this “self-defense.” After all, there’s nothing quite as defensive as severing the head of an expectant mother and forcing foreign doctors to deliver her dead child in the rubble of what used to be a hospital . Bravo, civilization . The tragedy is not just the atrocity itself. It’s the smug perfo...

Britain’s Recognition of Palestine: A Century of Complicity in Disguise.

So we’ve reached this moment: Keir Starmer’s UK “ recognises the State of Palestine. ” Applause lines up. Speeches made. Headlines dazzled. But behind the pomp, the guns, the exports, the intelligence, the training — history rings out in mocking laughter. Because Britain has been complicit since day one. This recognition is not redemption . It’s theatre. 1. The Original Sin: Balfour Declaration Let’s go back. Because if you don’t know your history, you’ll be fooled by the future. On 2 November 1917 , Arthur James Balfour (Britain’s Foreign Secretary) wrote to Lord Rothschild, and officially declared: “His Majesty’s Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object , it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine , or the rights and political sta...

Gaza’s Medical Apocalypse: Numbers, Neglect, and the Farce of “Access”

  If you ever needed proof that statistics can be more damning than bombs, look at Gaza’s health crisis . Behind the headlines and hashtags lies a cascade of bodies and broken systems. We have numbers, we have reports, we have PDFs— and yet the world stares, unmoved, at the collapse. Below is your ruthless, numbers-soaked guide to the suffering —and the institutional failure—behind Gaza’s medical implosion . 1. The Health System Is Already Dead. We’re Just Counting the Corpse. According to WHO, “The Gaza Strip faces an unprecedented humanitarian crisis with rising mortality and widespread displacement.” Between 1 January and 31 August 2024 , local health authorities reported 18,900 deaths and 38,916 injuries . Women, children, and the elderly account for over 50 % of fatal casualties . More than 53 % of Gaza’s 36 hospitals were non-functional as of August 2024, and many of the partially functioning ones lacked adequate water or relied entirely on fuel generators. ...

The End of Zionism? Welcome to the Funeral Nobody Wants to Admit Is Overdue

  Of course. Haaretz recently published an opinion piece by Ithamar Handelman -Smith titled “ Some Say It’s the End of Zionism, and I Say That’s All Right .” And what impeccable timing: as Israel carries out a near-two-year campaign of siege, famine, and bombardment in Gaza — slaughtering families, burying aid workers with their ambulances, and literally starving children to death — someone in Israel finally whispers the unspeakable: maybe Zionism, that 20th-century project of “ Jewish salvation ,” has outlived its moral shelf life. Bravo. The house is burning, bodies are scattered in the street, and the philosopher shows up with a garden hose . Zionism: Success Story or Crime Scene? Handelman-Smith argues that Zionism achieved its success : a Jewish state, a safe haven, a fortress against the ghosts of Europe’s crimes . But like every “ success story ” drenched in other people’s blood , it didn’t age well. What began as refuge turned into domination; what was called “ ...

The Ceasefire of Exhaustion: When Empires Collapse from Within

  By Malik Mukhtar — ainnbeen.blogspot.com Two years after Gaza was first set on fire , the war that began with biblical vengeance has stumbled to an exhausted ceasefire . On October 9, 2025 , Israel and Hamas — after endless carnage, famine, and rubble — have signed the first phase of a ceasefire agreement mediated in Sharm el-Sheikh . Trump called it a “ historic peace plan. ” History may call it a truce of attrition — a war that collapsed under the weight of its own hubris. What the Ceasefire Says — and What It Doesn’t Under the agreement, Israeli forces are to pull back to a designated “yellow line” within 24 hours of cabinet ratification. Hamas, in turn, will release all remaining hostages — alive or dead — within 72 hours after the withdrawal. Israel will free about 2,000 Palestinian prisoners, though it made sure to exclude political figures like Marwan Barghouti , whose freedom would remind the world that Palestine still breathes. Humanitarian convoys — food,...